World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
74
Citations
22737
World Ranking
1221
National Ranking
632

Stuart Linn publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Linn sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 164 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Stuart Linn D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Linn sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1974 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Stuart Linn is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a specialization in molecular biology as a key subfield.

The core topics of their work include DNA repair mechanisms and DNA and nucleic acid chemistry. These areas represent the main concentration of their scientific investigations.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled DDB Accumulates at DNA Damage Sites Immediately after UV Irradiation and Directly Stimulates Nucleotide Excision Repair, published in 2021 in the UNC Libraries venue. This publication has received citations indicating recognition within the scientific community.

Stuart Linn has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Mitsuo Wakasugi
  • Aki Kawashima
  • Hiroshi Morioka
  • Aziz Sancar
  • Toshio Mori

Their work has been published in the UNC Libraries among other venues, reflecting their active participation in academic publishing.

In recognition of their scientific career, Stuart Linn has been awarded fellowships including the Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2001 and the Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1974.

Best Publications

  • Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian DNA Repair and the DNA Damage Checkpoints

    Aziz Sancar;Laura A Lindsey-Boltz;Keziban Unsal-Kaçmaz;Stuart Linn

  • Toxic DNA damage by hydrogen peroxide through the Fenton reaction in vivo and in vitro.

    James A. Imlay;Sherman M. Chin;Stuart Linn

  • Formation, Prevention, and Repair of DNA Damage by Iron/Hydrogen Peroxide

    Ernst S. Henle;Stuart Linn

  • Mutagenesis and stress responses induced in Escherichia coli by hydrogen peroxide

    J A Imlay;S Linn

  • Bimodal pattern of killing of DNA-repair-defective or anoxically grown Escherichia coli by hydrogen peroxide.

    J A Imlay;S Linn

  • A human RNA polymerase II complex associated with SRB and DNA-repair proteins

    Edio Maldonado;Ramin Shiekhattar;Michael Sheldon;Michael Sheldon;Helen Cho

  • SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC DNA CLEAVAGE BY FE2+-MEDIATED FENTON REACTIONS HAS POSSIBLE BIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS

    Ernst S. Henle;Zhengxu Han;Ning Tang;Priyamvada Rai

  • Purification and Properties of the recBC DNase of Escherichia coli K-12

    Peter J. Goldmark;Stuart Linn

  • DNA N-glycosylases and UV repair.

    Bruce Demple;Stuart Linn

  • DNA repair synthesis in human fibroblasts requires DNA polymerase delta.

    C Nishida;P Reinhard;S Linn

  • Escherichia coli xth mutants are hypersensitive to hydrogen peroxide.

    B Demple;J Halbrook;S Linn

  • Comparative analysis of binding of human damaged DNA-binding protein (XPE) and Escherichia coli damage recognition protein (UvrA) to the major ultraviolet photoproducts: T[c,s]T, T[t,s]T, T[6-4]T, and T[Dewar]T.

    J T Reardon;A F Nichols;S Keeney;C A Smith

  • DDB Accumulates at DNA Damage Sites Immediately after UV Irradiation and Directly Stimulates Nucleotide Excision Repair

    Mitsuo Wakasugi;Aki Kawashima;Hiroshi Morioka;Stuart Linn

  • Characterization of a human DNA damage binding protein implicated in xeroderma pigmentosum E.

    S. Keeney;George J Chang;S. Linn

  • An altered apurinic DNA endonuclease activity in group A and group D xeroderma pigmentosum fibroblasts.

    Urs Kuhnlein;Edward E. Penhoet;Stuart Linn

  • Oxidative damage to DNA constituents by iron-mediated fenton reactions. The deoxyguanosine family.

    Ernst S. Henle;Yongzhang Luo;Walter Gassmann;Stuart Linn

  • Implication of Mammalian Ribosomal Protein S3 in the Processing of DNA Damage

    Joon Kim;Leda S. Chubatsu;Arie Admon;Joachim Stahl

  • Host specificity of DNA produced by Escherichia coli. XI. In vitro modification of phage fd replicative form

    Urs Kühnlein;Stuart Linn;Werner Arber

  • Chromosomal localization and cDNA cloning of the genes (DDB1 and DDB2) for the p127 and p48 subunits of a human damage-specific DNA binding protein.

    Rachel Dualan;Tom Brody;Scott Keeney;Anne F. Nichols

  • Oxidative Damage to DNA Constituents by Iron-mediated Fenton Reactions

    Ernst S. Henle;Yongzhang Luo;Walter Gassmann;Stuart Linn

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott Keeney
Scott Keeney Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
James A. Imlay
James A. Imlay University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Yoshiyuki Mizushina
Yoshiyuki Mizushina Shinshu University
Hiromi Yoshida
Hiromi Yoshida Kobe Gakuin University
Shonen Yoshida
Shonen Yoshida Nagoya University
Bruce Demple
Bruce Demple Stony Brook University
Aziz Sancar
Aziz Sancar University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Joon Kim
Joon Kim Seoul National University
Arie Admon
Arie Admon Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Yoshiyuki Sakaki
Yoshiyuki Sakaki Toyohashi University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology opens many academic and professional doors. As online education expands, students have more choices for related degrees with flexible formats. For those with an interest in design and innovation in scientific research environments, earning an architect online degree may provide unique interdisciplinary skills.

Quantitative skills are critical in molecular biology. Students looking to strengthen their analytical foundations can benefit from online math degree programs that teach essential statistics and data analysis methods. Modern biology also relies heavily on data visualization. Creative students may pursue graphic design schools online to master visual communication for scientific publications and presentations.

Interdisciplinary study options provide the flexibility to blend biology with technology, art, or business. For cost-conscious learners, affordable online interdisciplinary studies degrees allow students to customize their education while managing expenses. Together, these related degrees help catalyze diverse career pathways in research, healthcare, biotech, and science communication.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart Linn

Recently Published Articles