World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
8076
World Ranking
5297
National Ranking
554

Shelley Channon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shelley Channon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Shelley Channon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shelley Channon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shelley Channon is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research activities conducted within this institution.

Data regarding recent papers authored by Shelley Channon, including titles and publication venues, is not available.

Information about frequent co-authors and common publication venues is not present in the current data.

Details regarding book publications or publishers associated with Shelley Channon are also not provided.

There is no data on main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics connected to Shelley Channon.

Information on awards or honors received is not available for this researcher.

Best Publications

  • The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology

    Paul W. Burgess;Nick Alderman;Catrin Forbes;Angela Costello

  • Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability

    David A. Lagnado;Shelley Channon

  • Classical conditioning after temporal lobe lesions in man: impairment in conditional discrimination.

    Irene Daum;Shelley Channon;Charles E. Polkey;Jeffrey A. Gray

  • The effects of anterior lesions on performance on a story comprehension test: left anterior impairment on a theory of mind-type task.

    Shelley Channon;Sarah Crawford

  • Executive function, memory, and learning in Tourette's syndrome.

    Shelley Channon;Polly Pratt;Mary M. Robertson

  • Social cognition after head injury: sarcasm and theory of mind.

    Shelley Channon;Asa Pellijeff;Andrea Rule

  • A controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural and behavioural treatment of anorexia nervosa

    S Channon;P de Silva;D Hemsley;R Perkins

  • Executive function, mentalizing and humor in major depression.

    J Uekermann;S Channon;C Lehmkämper;M Abdel-Hamid

  • Selective processing of food words in anorexia nervosa.

    Shelley Channon;David Hemsley;Padmal de Silva

  • Working memory in clinical depression: an experimental study

    Shelley Channon;Jane E. Baker;Mary M. Robertson

  • Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning.

    David R. Shanks;Leonora Wilkinson;Shelley Channon

  • Real-Life-Type Problem-Solving in Asperger's Syndrome

    Shelley Channon;Tony Charman;Jane Heap;Sarah Crawford

  • Classical conditioning in patients with severe memory problems.

    Irene Daum;Shelley Channon;Anthony G. Canavan

  • Theory of mind, humour processing and executive functioning in alcoholism.

    J. Uekermann;S. Channon;K. Winkel;P. Schlebusch

  • The role of working memory in decoding emotions.

    Louise H. Phillips;Shelley Channon;Mary Tunstall;Anna Hedenstrom

  • The effect of short-term fasting on processing of food cues in normal subjects.

    Shelley Channon;Andrew Hayward

  • Executive function in depression: the role of performance strategies in aiding depressed and non-depressed participants

    S Channon;P S S Green

  • Executive dysfunction in depression: the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

    Unknown

  • Effects of a secondary task on "implicit" sequence learning: learning or performance?

    David R Shanks;Shelley Channon

  • Problem-solving in real-life-type situations: the effects of anterior and posterior lesions on performance

    Shelley Channon;Sarah Crawford

  • Humor processing, mentalizing, and executive function in normal aging.

    Jennifer Uekermann;Shelley Channon;Irene Daum

  • The psychopathology of Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome. A controlled study.

    Mary M. Robertson;Shelley Channon;Jane Baker;Deborah Flynn

  • Tourette's syndrome: performance on tests of behavioural inhibition, working memory and gambling.

    Sarah Crawford;Shelley Channon;Mary M. Robertson

  • Book reviewHandbook of psychotherapy for Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia: D.M. Garner and P.E. Garfinkel (eds): Guilford Press, New York (1985). xvi + 592 pages. £39.95.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Irene Daum
Irene Daum Ruhr University Bochum
Mary M. Robertson
Mary M. Robertson University College London
David R. Shanks
David R. Shanks University College London
Jeffrey A. Gray
Jeffrey A. Gray King's College London
Paul W. Burgess
Paul W. Burgess University College London
Charles E. Polkey
Charles E. Polkey King's College London
Louise H. Phillips
Louise H. Phillips University of Aberdeen
Sam J. Gilbert
Sam J. Gilbert University College London
Tony Charman
Tony Charman King's College London
H. Valerie Curran
H. Valerie Curran University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a broad array of online degrees and career opportunities across the social sciences. Whether you are interested in working directly with people, researching human behavior, or applying psychology in organizational settings, there are several academic and professional routes to consider.

For those intrigued by workplace dynamics and employee well-being, it’s worth exploring what jobs can you get with a masters in industrial organizational psychology. This area merges psychology and business to improve productivity, talent management, and organizational culture.

If you are curious about society, patterns of behavior, and structural influences, learning what to do with a masters in sociology can provide insights into research and policy roles within governmental, non-profit, or private organizations.

More broadly, what jobs can you get with a psychology degree highlights a diverse range of career paths, from counseling and mental health services to education, marketing, and human resources.

To further expand your knowledge, review the available social science courses in university that can help you develop critical skills and explore interdisciplinary approaches to understanding human behavior.

Best Scientists Citing Shelley Channon

Trending Scientists