World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Diana S. Woodruff-Pak

Diana S. Woodruff-Pak

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
5962
World Ranking
6279
National Ranking
2733

Diana S. Woodruff-Pak publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana S. Woodruff-Pak sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 119 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Diana S. Woodruff-Pak D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana S. Woodruff-Pak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Diana S. Woodruff-Pak is affiliated with Temple University in the United States. Their professional work is connected primarily to this institution.

Diana S. Woodruff-Pak was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1998.

Best Publications

  • Trace conditioning: abolished by cerebellar nuclear lesions but not lateral cerebellar cortex aspirations.

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;David G. Lavond;Richard F. Thompson

  • Galantamine: Effect on nicotinic receptor binding, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, and learning

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;Richard W. Vogel;Gary L. Wenk

  • Where is the trace in trace conditioning

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;John F. Disterhoft

  • Classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in the delay paradigm in adults aged 18-83 years.

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;Richard F. Thompson

  • Cerebellar involvement in eyeblink classical conditioning in humans.

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;Michelle Papka;Richard B. Ivry

  • Animal models of Alzheimer's disease: therapeutic implications.

    Diana S Woodruff-Pak

  • Differential effects and rates of normal aging in cerebellum and hippocampus

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;Michael R. Foy;Garnik G. Akopian;Ka Hung Lee

  • Eyeblink classical conditioning in H.M.: delay and trace paradigms

    D. S. Woodruff-Pak

  • The Neuropsychology of Aging

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak

  • A nicotinic agonist (GTS-21), eyeblink classical conditioning and nicotinic receptor binding in rabbit brain

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;Yong-Tong Li;William R. Kem

  • Eyeblink conditioning discriminates Alzheimer's patients from non-demented aged.

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;Richard G. Finkbiner;Doris K. Sasse

  • Age sensitivity of behavioral tests and brain substrates of normal aging in mice.

    John A. Kennard;Diana S. Woodruff-Pak

  • Classical conditioning in 3-, 30-, and 45-month-old rabbits: behavioral learning and hippocampal unit activity.

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;David G. Lavond;Christine G. Logan;Richard F. Thompson

  • Amyloid plaques in cerebellar cortex and the integrity of Purkinje cell dendrites

    Yong-Tong Li;Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;John Q. Trojanowski

  • MRI-Assessed Volume of Cerebellum Correlates with Associative Learning

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;Richard W. Vogel;Michael Ewers;Justin Coffey

  • Classical eyeblink conditioning in adulthood: effects of age and interstimulus interval on acquisition in the trace paradigm.

    Richard G. Finkbiner;Diana S. Woodruff-Pak

  • Eyeblink classical conditioning differentiates normal aging from Alzheimer's disease.

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak

  • Nicotinic cholinergic modulation: galantamine as a prototype.

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;Cynthia Lander;Hugo Geerts

  • Inactivation of sodium channel Scn8A (Na-sub(v)1.6) in Purkinje neurons impairs learning in Morris water maze and delay but not trace eyeblink classical conditioning.

    Diana S. Woodruff-Pak;John T. Green;Stephen I. Levin;Miriam H. Meisler

  • Eyeblink classical conditioning: hippocampal formation is for neutral stimulus associations as cerebellum is for association-response.

    John T. Green;Diana S. Woodruff-Pak

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Ivry
Richard B. Ivry University of California, Berkeley
Joseph E. Steinmetz
Joseph E. Steinmetz The Ohio State University
Gary L. Wenk
Gary L. Wenk The Ohio State University
Richard F. Thompson
Richard F. Thompson University of Southern California
Luis Del Valle
Luis Del Valle Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
Lee-Yuan Liu-Chen
Lee-Yuan Liu-Chen Temple University
Thomas J. Gould
Thomas J. Gould Pennsylvania State University
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Richard J. Servatius
Richard J. Servatius SUNY Upstate Medical University
Miriam H. Meisler
Miriam H. Meisler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience doesn't have to mean following a traditional campus path. Many students now consider accelerated programs online, which can help you earn your degree faster and jumpstart your career. These programs are ideal if you have clear goals and want to maximize your time.

Choosing the right degree is also crucial. Neuroscience aligns well with some of the most valuable degree in the world options related to health sciences and technology. In fact, students often find areas within neuroscience that are considered fun majors in college that pay well, offering both financial reward and intellectual satisfaction.

Affordability and financial aid are important concerns too. If you're looking for value, you’ll find many online colleges that accept fafsa, which can make your studies more accessible without sacrificing quality. Whether your focus is flexibility, earning potential, or cost, there are tailored pathways for future neuroscientists in today’s online education landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Diana S. Woodruff-Pak