World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4453 4123 2473 2239 183 9267
Neuroscience 55 4783 4399 2152 1945 165 9206

Mark E. Stanton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark E. Stanton between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark E. Stanton published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 1 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1980: 4 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark E. Stanton: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 4
1981 1
1982 2
1983 3
1984 2
1985 2
1986 0
1987 2
1988 3
1989 3
1990 3
1991 5
1992 4
1993 3
1994 6
1995 7
1996 4
1997 1
1998 5
1999 2
2000 3
2001 5
2002 4
2003 2
2004 2
2005 6
2006 5
2007 8
2008 7
2009 10
2010 8
2011 19
2012 6
2013 6
2014 7
2015 3
2016 6
2017 5
2018 6
2019 5
2020 3
2021 3
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 192
Download as CSV

Mark E. Stanton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Stanton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 183 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 183
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark E. Stanton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Stanton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark E. Stanton is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on topics within Medicine and Neuroscience, with specific attention to Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The key research topics addressed in their work include:

  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep

Mark E. Stanton has published in several scientific venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Developmental Psychobiology
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Open Access Repository (University of Tasmania)

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Role of dorsal and ventral hippocampal muscarinic receptor activity in acquisition and retention of contextual fear conditioning." (2020) published in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • "Prefrontal NMDA-receptor antagonism disrupts encoding or consolidation but not retrieval of incidental context learning" (2021) published in Behavioural Brain Research
  • "Infant rats can acquire, but not retain contextual associations in object-in-context and contextual fear conditioning paradigms" (2020) published in Developmental Psychobiology
  • "Mechanisms of context conditioning in the developing rat" (2021) published in Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • "Lorazepam-induced amnesia: examination of delayed free recall and priming effects" (2023) published in Open Access Repository (University of Tasmania)

Their collaborations include frequent work with several co-authors such as Nicholas A. Heroux, Colin J. Horgan, Claudia C. Pinizzotto, Hollie R. Sanders, and Nathen J. Murawski, reflecting varied research partnerships across their publications.

Best Publications

  • Deficient cerebellar long-term depression and impaired motor learning in mGluR1 mutant mice.

    Atsu Aiba;Masanobu Kano;Chong Chen;Chong Chen;Mark Stanton

  • Exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonate during pregnancy in rat and mouse. II: postnatal evaluation.

    Christopher Lau;Julie R. Thibodeaux;Roger G. Hanson;John M. Rogers

  • Behavioral stress impairs long-term potentiation in rodent hippocampus

    Michael R. Foy;Mark E. Stanton;Seymour Levine;Richard F. Thompson

  • Maternal deprivation potentiates pituitary-adrenal stress responses in infant rats.

    Mark E. Stanton;Yvonne R. Gutierrez;Seymour Levine

  • Multiple memory systems, development and conditioning

    Mark E. Stanton

  • Impaired eyeblink conditioning in children with fetal alcohol syndrome.

    Sandra W. Jacobson;Mark E. Stanton;Christopher D. Molteno;Matthew J. Burden

  • Memory and the septo-hippocampal cholinergic system in the rat

    Gilberto N. O. Brito;Becky J. Davis;Linda C. Stopp;Mark E. Stanton

  • Inhibition of infant glucocorticoid stress response: Specific role of maternal cues

    Mark E. Stanton;Mark E. Stanton;Seymour Levine

  • Maternal contact inhibits pituitary-adrenal stress responses in preweanling rats.

    Mark E. Stanton;Mark E. Stanton;James Wallstrom;Seymour Levine

  • Efficacy of Maternal Choline Supplementation During Pregnancy in Mitigating Adverse Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Growth and Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trial

    Sandra W. Jacobson;Sandra W. Jacobson;R. Colin Carter;R. Colin Carter;Christopher D. Molteno;Mark E. Stanton

  • Differential ontogeny of working memory and reference memory in the rat.

    Ronald J. Green;Mark E. Stanton

  • Eyeblink conditioning in the developing rat.

    Mark E. Stanton;John H. Freeman;Ronald W. Skelton

  • Social influences on conditioned cortisol secretion in the squirrel monkey.

    Mark E. Stanton;Jeffrey M. Patterson;Seymour Levine

  • Workshop on the qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal developmental neurotoxicity, Work Group I report: comparability of measures of developmental neurotoxicity in humans and laboratory animals.

    Mark E. Stanton;Linda P. Spear

  • Effects of early hippocampal lesions on trace, delay, and long-delay eyeblink conditioning in developing rats.

    Dragana Ivkovich;Mark E. Stanton

  • Impaired delay and trace eyeblink conditioning in school-age children with fetal alcohol syndrome

    Sandra W. Jacobson;Mark E. Stanton;Neil C. Dodge;Mariska Pienaar

  • Fornix transections disrupt the ontogeny of latent inhibition in the rat

    Michelle M. Nicolle;Craig C. Barry;Bellina Veronesi;Mark E. Stanton;Mark E. Stanton

  • Neonatal Ethanol Exposure Impairs Eyeblink Conditioning in Weanling Rats

    Mark E. Stanton;Charles R. Goodlett

  • Ontogeny of delay versus trace eyeblink conditioning in the rat

    Dragana Ivkovich;Christine M. Paczkowski;Mark E. Stanton

  • Disruption of human eyeblink conditioning after central cholinergic blockade with scopolamine.

    Paul R. Solomon;MaryEllen Groccia-Ellison;Deirdre Flynn;Jennifer Mirak

  • The ontogeny of learning and memory.

    David Bucci;Mark Stanton

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra W. Jacobson
Sandra W. Jacobson Wayne State University
Jeffrey B. Rosen
Jeffrey B. Rosen University of Delaware
John H. Freeman
John H. Freeman University of Iowa
Seymour Levine
Seymour Levine Stanford University
Kevin M. Crofton
Kevin M. Crofton R3Fellows LLC
Bradley S. Peterson
Bradley S. Peterson University of Southern California
John E. Desmond
John E. Desmond Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Linda P. Spear
Linda P. Spear Binghamton University
Michela Gallagher
Michela Gallagher Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up flexible options for students throughout the United States. Many prospective students are searching for quality education at an affordable price. Schools in key locations, such as Florida, Massachusetts, and California, offer a variety of options worth considering. For instance, if you are researching cost-effective study routes, you can review the cheapest psychology degrees in Boca Raton or the cheapest psychology programs in Boston to find programs that meet your financial needs.

California also stands out with its affordable psychology programs in California, catering to a large and diverse student population. Likewise, those seeking value in the Southeast can explore the most affordable psychology degree programs in Florida.

With so many online and on-campus options, students can choose a pathway that aligns with their career ambitions. Whether you plan to become a counselor, researcher, or clinical psychologist, affordable programs can provide a solid foundation for your future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Stanton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles