World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
69
Citations
20911
World Ranking
2592
National Ranking
1225

David M. Diamond publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Diamond sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David M. Diamond D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Diamond sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Diamond is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism as well as Surgery and Physiology. Other areas of study include Epidemiology and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's recent publications emphasize topics related to lipoproteins, cardiovascular health, and metabolic processes. Notable recent papers include:

  • Dietary Recommendations for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: an Evidence-Free Zone (2020, BMJ evidence-based medicine)
  • Low carbohydrate diet: are concerns with saturated fat, lipids, and cardiovascular disease risk justified? (2020, Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity)
  • Statin therapy is not warranted for a person with high LDL-cholesterol on a low-carbohydrate diet (2022, Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity)

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

David M. Diamond has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including Zack Z. Cernovsky, Michel de Lorgeril, Malcolm Kendrick, Uffe Ravnskov, and Stephan C. Mann. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary interests and a focus that crosses over into psychiatry, clinical pharmacology, and metabolic studies.

Their publications appear often in specialized academic journals. Frequent venues include:

  • Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
  • Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity
  • Nutrients
  • Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
  • Cureus

David M. Diamond's research contributes to an understanding of diet-related impacts on cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, with emphasis on low-carbohydrate dietary effects and critiques of common lipid management strategies. Their work also touches on traumatic brain injury and health system evaluation, indicating a broad range of medical topics explored through empirical research.

Best Publications

  • A beta peptide vaccination prevents memory loss in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Dave Morgan;David M. Diamond;Paul E. Gottschall;Kenneth E. Ugen

  • The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memories

    Jeansok J. Kim;David M. Diamond

  • The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law

    David M. Diamond;Adam M. Campbell;Collin R. Park;Joshua Halonen

  • Inverted-U relationship between the level of peripheral corticosterone and the magnitude of hippocampal primed burst potentiation.

    David M. Diamond;David M. Diamond;M. Catherine Bennett;Monika Fleshner;Gregory M. Rose;Gregory M. Rose

  • Biological stress response terminology: Integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose-response framework

    Edward J. Calabrese;Kenneth A. Bachmann;A. John Bailer;P. Michael Bolger

  • Blueberry Supplementation Enhances Signaling and Prevents Behavioral Deficits in an Alzheimer Disease Model

    J. A. Joseph;G. Arendash;M Gordon;David M. Diamond

  • Exposing rats to a predator impairs spatial working memory in the radial arm water maze

    David M. Diamond;Collin R. Park;Collin R. Park;Karen L. Heman;Gregory M. Rose

  • Progressive, age-related behavioral impairments in transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin-1 transgenes.

    Gary W. Arendash;David L. King;Marcia N. Gordon;Dave Morgan

  • Psychological stress impairs spatial working memory: relevance to electrophysiological studies of hippocampal function.

    David M. Diamond;Monika Fleshner;Nan Ingersoll;Gregory M. Rose

  • Current status on behavioral and biological markers of PTSD: a search for clarity in a conflicting literature.

    Phillip R. Zoladz;David M. Diamond

  • Epigenetic modification of hippocampal Bdnf DNA in adult rats in an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder

    Tania L. Roth;Tania L. Roth;Phillip R. Zoladz;J. David Sweatt;David M. Diamond

  • Physiological plasticity in auditory cortex: Rapid induction by learning

    Norman M. Weinberger;David M. Diamond

  • How can drug discovery for psychiatric disorders be improved

    Yves Agid;György Buzsáki;David M. Diamond;Richard Frackowiak

  • The neurobiological properties of Tianeptine (Stablon): from monoamine hypothesis to glutamatergic modulation

    Bruce S. McEwen;Sumantra Chattarji;David M. Diamond;Thérèse M. Jay;Thérèse M. Jay

  • Two-day radial-arm water maze learning and memory task; robust resolution of amyloid-related memory deficits in transgenic mice

    Jennifer Alamed;Donna M Wilcock;David M Diamond;Marcia N Gordon

  • Exposing Rats to a Predator Blocks Primed Burst Potentiation in the Hippocampus In Vitro

    Michael H. Mesches;Monika Fleshner;Karen L. Heman;Gregory M. Rose

  • Characteristics of Hippocampal Primed Burst Potentiation in vitro and in the Awake Rat

    David M. Diamond;T. V. Dunwiddie;G. M. Rose

  • Classical conditioning rapidly induces specific changes in frequency receptive fields of single neurons in secondary and ventral ectosylvian auditory cortical fields.

    David M. Diamond;Norman M. Weinberger

  • Influence of predator stress on the consolidation versus retrieval of long-term spatial memory and hippocampal spinogenesis.

    David M. Diamond;Adam M. Campbell;Collin R. Park;James C. Woodson

  • Correlation between cognitive deficits and Aβ deposits in transgenic APP+PS1 mice

    Marcia N Gordon;David L King;David M Diamond;Paul T Jantzen

Frequent Co-Authors

Monika Fleshner
Monika Fleshner University of Colorado Boulder
Kevin E. Kip
Kevin E. Kip University of South Florida
Marcia N. Gordon
Marcia N. Gordon Michigan State University
Greg M. Rose
Greg M. Rose United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Gary W. Arendash
Gary W. Arendash University of South Florida
Fiona Crawford
Fiona Crawford Roskamp Institute
Norman M. Weinberger
Norman M. Weinberger University of California, Irvine
Allan V. Kalueff
Allan V. Kalueff Ural Federal University
Cheryl D. Conrad
Cheryl D. Conrad Arizona State University
Gal Richter-Levin
Gal Richter-Levin University of Haifa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David M. Diamond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles