World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
29331
World Ranking
3061
National Ranking
1419

Marcia N. Gordon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia N. Gordon sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marcia N. Gordon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia N. Gordon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcia N. Gordon is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience and medicine. Within these main disciplines, their work delves deeply into subfields such as neurology, physiology, biological psychiatry, molecular biology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics that include neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, tryptophan and brain disorders, immune cells in cancer, chemokine receptors and signaling, telomeres, telomerase, and senescence, as well as dementia and cognitive impairment research.

Marcia N. Gordon's recent peer-reviewed publications illustrate a focus on Alzheimer's disease and related neurodegenerative processes. These papers include:

  • "Diversity of transcriptomic microglial phenotypes in aging and Alzheimer's disease" (2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia)
  • "CCL2 Overexpression in the Brain Promotes Glial Activation and Accelerates Tau Pathology in a Mouse Model of Tauopathy" (2020, Frontiers in Immunology)
  • "Radiation-induced senescence: therapeutic opportunities" (2023, Radiation Oncology)
  • "Impact of COVID-19 on the Onset and Progression of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: A Roadmap for Future Research" (2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia)
  • "Toward Development of Neuron Specific Transduction After Systemic Delivery of Viral Vectors" (2021, Frontiers in Neurology)

These publication venues are recurring in their record, with a notable frequency in journals such as Alzheimer's & Dementia and Frontiers in Immunology. Other frequent journals include the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, and Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions.

Their frequent co-authors include researchers such as David Morgan, Dave Morgan, Kevin Nash, Dylan J. Finneran, and Brianna Jackman, indicating collaboration within a network of scientists working on related neuroscience and neurodegenerative topics.

Best Publications

  • Amyloid Oligomers Exacerbate Tau Pathology in a Mouse Model of Tauopathy

    Maj Linda B. Selenica;Milene Brownlow;Jeffy P. Jimenez;Daniel C. Lee

  • A beta peptide vaccination prevents memory loss in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Dave Morgan;David M. Diamond;Paul E. Gottschall;Kenneth E. Ugen

  • Increased amyloid-β42(43) in brains of mice expressing mutant presenilin 1

    Karen Duff;Karen Duff;Chris Eckman;Cindy Zehr;Cindy Zehr;Xin Yu

  • Accelerated Alzheimer-type phenotype in transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1 transgenes

    Leigh Holcomb;Marcia N. Gordon;Eileen Mcgowan;Xin Yu

  • Passive immunotherapy against Aβ in aged APP-transgenic mice reverses cognitive deficits and depletes parenchymal amyloid deposits in spite of increased vascular amyloid and microhemorrhage

    Donna M Wilcock;Amyn Rojiani;Arnon Rosenthal;Sangeetha Subbarao

  • Blueberry Supplementation Enhances Signaling and Prevents Behavioral Deficits in an Alzheimer Disease Model

    J. A. Joseph;G. Arendash;M Gordon;David M. Diamond

  • Behavioral Changes in Transgenic Mice Expressing Both Amyloid Precursor Protein and Presenilin-1 Mutations: Lack of Association with Amyloid Deposits

    Leigh A. Holcomb;Marcia N. Gordon;Paul Jantzen;Karen Hsiao

  • Progressive, age-related behavioral impairments in transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin-1 transgenes.

    Gary W. Arendash;David L. King;Marcia N. Gordon;Dave Morgan

  • Caloric restriction attenuates Aβ-deposition in Alzheimer transgenic models

    Nilay V. Patel;Marcia N. Gordon;Karen E. Connor;Robert A. Good

  • Microglial Activation and β-Amyloid Deposit Reduction Caused by a Nitric Oxide-Releasing Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug in Amyloid Precursor Protein Plus Presenilin-1 Transgenic Mice

    Paul T. Jantzen;Karen E. Connor;Giovanni DiCarlo;Gary L. Wenk

  • Intracranially Administered Anti-Αβ Antibodies Reduce β-Amyloid Deposition by Mechanisms Both Independent of and Associated with Microglial Activation

    Donna M. Wilcock;Giovanni DiCarlo;Debbi Henderson;Jennifer Jackson

  • Passive Amyloid Immunotherapy Clears Amyloid and Transiently Activates Microglia in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Amyloid Deposition

    Donna M. Wilcock;Amyn Rojiani;Arnon Rosenthal;Gil Levkowitz

  • LPS- induced inflammation exacerbates phospho-tau pathology in rTg4510 mice

    Daniel C. Lee;Justin Rizer;Maj Linda B. Selenica;Patrick Reid

  • Selectively reduced expression of synaptic plasticity-related genes in amyloid precursor protein + presenilin-1 transgenic mice.

    Chad A. Dickey;Jeanne F. Loring;Julia Montgomery;Marcia N. Gordon

  • Time course of the development of Alzheimer-like pathology in the doubly transgenic PS1+APP mouse.

    Marcia N. Gordon;Leigh A. Holcomb;Paul T. Jantzen;Giovanni DiCarlo

  • Intrahippocampal LPS injections reduce Aβ load in APP+PS1 transgenic mice

    Giovanni DiCarlo;Donna Wilcock;Debbi Henderson;Marcia Gordon

  • Two-day radial-arm water maze learning and memory task; robust resolution of amyloid-related memory deficits in transgenic mice

    Jennifer Alamed;Donna M Wilcock;David M Diamond;Marcia N Gordon

  • Microglial activation facilitates Aβ plaque removal following intracranial anti-Aβ antibody administration

    Donna M Wilcock;Sanjay K Munireddy;Arnon Rosenthal;Kenneth E Ugen

  • Correlation between cognitive deficits and Aβ deposits in transgenic APP+PS1 mice

    Marcia N Gordon;David L King;David M Diamond;Paul T Jantzen

  • Deglycosylated anti-amyloid-beta antibodies eliminate cognitive deficits and reduce parenchymal amyloid with minimal vascular consequences in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice.

    Donna M. Wilcock;Jennifer Alamed;Paul E. Gottschall;Jan Grimm

Frequent Co-Authors

Chad A. Dickey
Chad A. Dickey University of South Florida
Kenneth E. Ugen
Kenneth E. Ugen University of South Florida
David M. Diamond
David M. Diamond University of South Florida
Caleb E. Finch
Caleb E. Finch University of Southern California
Gary W. Arendash
Gary W. Arendash University of South Florida
Karen Duff
Karen Duff University College London
John Hardy
John Hardy University College London
Mike Hutton
Mike Hutton Eli Lilly (United States)
Paula C. Bickford
Paula C. Bickford University of South Florida
Jean de Vellis
Jean de Vellis University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Neuroscience opens doors to a range of in-demand fields such as psychology, counseling, and social work. If you’re looking for flexible options, several accelerated online degrees can help you transition quickly towards rewarding career paths. For instance, accelerated online msw programs are ideal for those interested in advanced social work roles or research, streamlining the learning process without compromising on quality.

Similarly, accelerated psychology programs allow you to gain essential insight into human behavior, which is immensely beneficial if you want to pursue careers in therapy, research, or mental health services. If counseling is your focus, considering a cacrep online masters in counseling can ensure your credentials are recognized and respected.

Budget is also a priority for many students—exploring the most affordable online counseling degrees can help you build skills in mental health support without incurring significant debt. These online pathways not only offer flexibility but also equip you for diverse and rapidly evolving career opportunities closely tied to Neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Marcia N. Gordon

Trending Scientists