World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
22550
World Ranking
3068
National Ranking
1422

Jeansok J. Kim publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeansok J. Kim sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 137 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jeansok J. Kim D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeansok J. Kim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeansok J. Kim is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant presence in related subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, social psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and endocrine and autonomic systems.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of topics, including:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Circadian Rhythm and Melatonin
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function

Recent publications by Jeansok J. Kim and their collaborators provide insight into ongoing research interests. These include:

  • Neurocognitive effects of stress: a metaparadigm perspective, 2023, Molecular Psychiatry
  • The nature and neurobiology of fear and anxiety: State of the science and opportunities for accelerating discovery, 2023, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Ecological analysis of Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats, 2022, Communications Biology
  • The Risky Closed Economy: A Holistic, Longitudinal Approach to Studying Fear and Anxiety in Rodents, 2020, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • 'Fearful-place' coding in the amygdala-hippocampal network, 2021, eLife

The scientist has published frequently in several venues, with multiple contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Molecular Psychiatry.

Collaborative work is a feature of their career. Frequent co-authors include Eun Joo Kim, Jeiwon Cho, Sanggeon Park, Bryan P. Schuessler, and Yeowool Huh. These partnerships have contributed to the breadth and continuity of research output.

Best Publications

  • Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear.

    Jeansok J. Kim;Michael S. Fanselow

  • The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memories

    Jeansok J. Kim;David M. Diamond

  • Neural circuits and mechanisms involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning: A critical review

    Jeansok J. Kim;Min Whan Jung

  • Effects of amygdala, hippocampus, and periaqueductal gray lesions on short- and long-term contextual fear.

    Jeansok J. Kim;Richard A. Rison;Michael S. Fanselow

  • PKCγ mutant mice exhibit mild deficits in spatial and contextual learning

    Asa Abeliovich;Richard Paylor;Chong Chen;Jeansok J. Kim

  • Stress Effects on the Hippocampus: A Critical Review.

    Eun Joo Kim;Blake Pellman;Jeansok J. Kim

  • Amygdala Is Critical for Stress-Induced Modulation of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation and Learning

    Jeansok J. Kim;Hongjoo J. Lee;Jung Soo Han;Mark G. Packard

  • Hippocampectomy impairs the memory of recently, but not remotely, acquired trace eyeblink conditioned responses.

    Jeansok J. Kim;Robert E. Clark;Richard F. Thompson

  • Stress: metaplastic effects in the hippocampus

    Jeansok J Kim;Kenneth S Yoon

  • Importance of the Intracellular Domain of NR2 Subunits for NMDA Receptor Function In Vivo

    Rolf Sprengel;Bettina Suchanek;Carla Amico;Rossella Brusa

  • Behavioral stress modifies hippocampal plasticity through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation

    Jeansok J. Kim;Michael R. Foy;Richard F. Thompson

  • Acquisition of contextual Pavlovian fear conditioning is blocked by application of an NMDA receptor antagonist D,L-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid to the basolateral amygdala

    Michael S. Fanselow;Jeansok J. Kim

  • Deficient Cerebellar Long-Term Depression, Impaired Eyeblink Conditioning, and Normal Motor Coordination in GFAP Mutant Mice

    Katsuei Shibuki;Hiroshi Gomi;Lu Chen;Shaowen Bao

  • Impaired motor coordination correlates with persistent multiple climbing fiber innervation in PKCγ mutant mice

    Chong Chen;Chong Chen;Masanobu Kano;Asa Abeliovich;Asa Abeliovich;Lu Chen

  • Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning

    Jeansok J. Kim;Richard E. Thompson

  • Effects of stress and hippocampal NMDA receptor antagonism on recognition memory in rats.

    Kevin B. Baker;Jeansok J. Kim

  • Amygdalar NMDA Receptors are Critical for New Fear Learning in Previously Fear-Conditioned Rats

    Hongjoo Lee;Jeansok J. Kim

  • N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist APV blocks acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning.

    Jeansok J. Kim;Joseph P. DeCola;Jesus Landeira-Fernandez;Michael S. Fanselow

  • Mammalian brain substrates of aversive classical conditioning.

    David G. Lavond;Jeansok J. Kim;Richard F. Thompson

  • Prefrontal cortex and hippocampus subserve different components of working memory in rats.

    Taejib Yoon;Jeffrey Okada;Min W. Jung;Jeansok J. Kim

  • Inhibitory Cerebello-Olivary Projections and Blocking Effect in Classical Conditioning

    Jeansok J. Kim;David J. Krupa;Richard F. Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard F. Thompson
Richard F. Thompson University of Southern California
Michael S. Fanselow
Michael S. Fanselow University of California, Los Angeles
Therese A. Kosten
Therese A. Kosten University of Houston
Shaowen Bao
Shaowen Bao University of Arizona
Lu Chen
Lu Chen Stanford University
Fred J. Helmstetter
Fred J. Helmstetter University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Ja Wook Koo
Ja Wook Koo Korea Brain Research Institute
Joseph E. Steinmetz
Joseph E. Steinmetz The Ohio State University
Allan R. Wagner
Allan R. Wagner Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jeansok J. Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles