World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
40
Citations
11838
World Ranking
19573
National Ranking
589

Sarah M. Russell publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah M. Russell sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 133 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Sarah M. Russell D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah M. Russell sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah M. Russell is affiliated with the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several subfields such as Molecular Biology, Immunology, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, and Neurology.

The scientist's recent publications explore diverse topics and have appeared in various journals. Notable papers include:

  • Bacteremia and Blood Culture Utilization during COVID-19 Surge in New York City, 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • Association of obesity with illness severity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study, 2021, Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
  • Developing T cells form an immunological synapse for passage through the β-selection checkpoint, 2020, The Journal of Cell Biology
  • Bacteremia and Blood Culture Utilization During COVID-19 Surge in New York City, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nanoscale magnetic imaging enabled by nitrogen vacancy centres in nanodiamonds labelled by iron-oxide nanoparticles, 2020, Nanoscale

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Sarah M. Russell include:

  • Mirren Charnley
  • Patrick O. Humbert
  • Suraj Suresh
  • Lucas M. Newton
  • Mohammad Arsalan Siddiqui

The venues where Russell publishes often feature multiple works, particularly:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
  • The Journal of Cell Biology

Research topics covered in their work comprise:

  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Best Publications

  • Defective lymphoid development in mice lacking expression of the common cytokine receptor gamma chain.

    Xiqing Cao;Elizabeth W. Shores;Jane Hu-Li;Miriam R. Anver

  • Interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain: a functional component of the interleukin-7 receptor

    Masayuki Noguchi;Yoshiaki Nakamura;Sarah M. Russell;Steven F. Ziegler

  • Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses.

    John T. Chang;Vikram R. Palanivel;Ichiko Kinjyo;Felix Schambach

  • Mutation of Jak3 in a Patient with SCID: Essential Role of Jak3 in Lymphoid Development

    Sarah M. Russell;Nahid Tayebi;Hiroshi Nakajima;Mary C. Riedy

  • Interaction of IL-2R beta and gamma c chains with Jak1 and Jak3 : implications for XSCID and XCID

    Sarah M. Russell;James A. Johnston;Masayuki Noguchi;Masaru Kawamura

  • Heterodimerization of the IL-2 receptor β- and γ-chain cytoplasmic domains is required for signalling

    Yoshlaki Nakamura;Sarah M. Russell;Sarah A. Mess;Sarah A. Mess;Michael Friedmann

  • Dlg, Scribble and Lgl in cell polarity, cell proliferation and cancer.

    Patrick Humbert;Sarah Russell;Helena Richardson

  • A network of PDZ-containing proteins regulates T cell polarity and morphology during migration and immunological synapse formation.

    Mandy J. Ludford-Menting;Jane Oliaro;Faruk Sacirbegovic;Eric T.-Y. Cheah

  • Different interleukin 2 receptor beta-chain tyrosines couple to at least two signaling pathways and synergistically mediate interleukin 2-induced proliferation

    Michael C. Friedmann;Thi-Sau Migone;Sarah M. Russell;Warren J. Leonard

  • Asymmetric Proteasome Segregation as a Mechanism for Unequal Partitioning of the Transcription Factor T-bet during T Lymphocyte Division

    John T. Chang;Maria L. Ciocca;Ichiko Kinjyo;Vikram R. Palanivel

  • T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase attenuates T cell signaling to maintain tolerance in mice

    Florian Wiede;Benjamin J. Shields;Sock Hui Chew;Konstantinos Kyparissoudis

  • The Molecular Basis of X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: The Role of the Interleukin-2 Receptor γ Chain as a Common γ Chain, γc

    Warren J. Leonard;Masayuki Noguchi;Sarah M. Russell;O. Wesley McBride

  • The tumour-suppressor Scribble dictates cell polarity during directed epithelial migration: regulation of Rho GTPase recruitment to the leading edge.

    Lukas E. Dow;Lukas E. Dow;Jeff S. Kauffman;Jacinta Caddy;A. S. Peterson

  • DOCK8 deficiency impairs CD8 T cell survival and function in humans and mice

    Katrina L. Randall;Stephanie S Y Chan;Cindy S. Ma;Cindy S. Ma;Ivan Fung;Ivan Fung

  • The Scribble and Par complexes in polarity and migration: friends or foes?

    Patrick O. Humbert;Lukas E. Dow;Lukas E. Dow;Sarah M. Russell;Sarah M. Russell;Sarah M. Russell

  • Asymmetric Cell Division of T Cells upon Antigen Presentation Uses Multiple Conserved Mechanisms

    Jane Oliaro;Vanessa Van Ham;Faruk Sacirbegovic;Anupama Pasam

  • hScrib is a functional homologue of the Drosophila tumour suppressor Scribble

    Lukas E Dow;Anthony M Brumby;Rosa Muratore;Michelle L Coombe

  • Tissue‐specific and allelic expression of the complement regulator CD46 is controlled by alternative splicing

    Sarah M. Russell;Rosemary L. Sparrow;Ian F. C. McKenzie;Damian F. J. Purcell

  • Polymorphic expression of CD46 protein isoforms due to tissue-specific RNA splicing.

    Ricky W. Johnstone;Sarah M. Russell;Bruce E. Loveland;Ian F.C. McKenzie

  • Asymmetric segregation and self-renewal of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with endocytic Ap2a2

    Stephen Bek Ngie Ting;Stephen Bek Ngie Ting;Eric Deneault;Kristin Hope;Sonia Cellot;Sonia Cellot

Frequent Co-Authors

Min Gu
Min Gu University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
Ricky W. Johnstone
Ricky W. Johnstone Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Warren J. Leonard
Warren J. Leonard National Institutes of Health
Ian F. C. McKenzie
Ian F. C. McKenzie University of Melbourne
Mark J. Smyth
Mark J. Smyth QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Carl R. Walkley
Carl R. Walkley Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Terence P. Speed
Terence P. Speed Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Damian F. J. Purcell
Damian F. J. Purcell University of Melbourne
Helena E. Richardson
Helena E. Richardson La Trobe University
Alan Ashworth
Alan Ashworth University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, particularly in the health and life sciences sectors. For those interested in leadership roles, considering online healthcare MBA programs can be an excellent next step. These programs offer flexible learning options designed for working professionals who want to advance into management within healthcare organizations.

Another pathway is in health information management, such as medical coding and billing. The demand for skilled coders continues to grow, and understanding the difference between ccs vs cpc salary can help you make informed decisions about which certification to pursue. These credentials influence earning potential and job responsibilities.

If you’re interested in job stability and flexibility, exploring medical.coding salary information will show industry averages and growth opportunities in this essential field. The medical coding job outlook also remains strong, supported by growing healthcare needs and the complexity of insurance billing systems. These alternative career pathways offer excellent potential for Biology and Biochemistry graduates seeking diverse or complementary options.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah M. Russell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles