World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
122
Citations
86894
World Ranking
3400
National Ranking
1871

Patrick Hwu publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Hwu sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 644 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Patrick Hwu D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Hwu sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Patrick Hwu is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Immunology and Microbiology, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work largely focuses on topics related to Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, CAR-T cell therapy research, and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses. Additional topics include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Immune Cell Function and Interaction, Ocular Oncology and Treatments, and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies.

Frequent coauthors with whom Patrick Hwu has collaborated include Sapna P. Patel, Michael A. Davies, Adi Diab, Chantale Bernatchez, and Cara Haymaker.

They have published extensively in several venues, with multiple papers appearing in the following journals and conference collections:

  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Cancer Research
  • Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts
  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Selected recent papers highlight the scope of their research:

  • "Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results From a Single-Arm Phase II Study" (2020), Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Safety, Efficacy, and Immune Activation (PIVOT-02)" (2020), Cancer Discovery
  • "Immuno-genomic landscape of osteosarcoma" (2020), Nature Communications
  • "Comprehensive T cell repertoire characterization of non-small cell lung cancer" (2020), Nature Communications
  • "Durvalumab plus tremelimumab in advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a single-centre phase 2 trial" (2022), The Lancet Oncology

Patrick Hwu's subfields of study further include Oncology, Immunology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, and Ophthalmology.

In recognition of their contributions to science, Patrick Hwu was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Safety and Activity of Anti–PD-L1 Antibody in Patients with Advanced Cancer

    Julie R. Brahmer;Scott S. Tykodi;Scott S. Tykodi;Laura Q.M. Chow;Wen Jen Hwu

  • Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients

    V. Gopalakrishnan;V. Gopalakrishnan;C. N. Spencer;C. N. Spencer;L. Nezi;A. Reuben

  • Cancer Regression and Autoimmunity in Patients After Clonal Repopulation with Antitumor Lymphocytes

    Mark E. Dudley;John R. Wunderlich;Paul F. Robbins;James C. Yang

  • A Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab, an Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody, for Metastatic Renal Cancer

    James C. Yang;Leah Haworth;Richard M. Sherry;Patrick Hwu

  • B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response

    Beth A. Helmink;Sangeetha M. Reddy;Jianjun Gao;Shaojun Zhang

  • Immunologic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma

    Steven A. Rosenberg;James C. Yang;Douglas J. Schwartzentruber;Patrick Hwu

  • Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy — assessment and management of toxicities

    Sattva S. Neelapu;Sudhakar Tummala;Partow Kebriaei;William Wierda

  • Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma

    Giao Q. Phan;James C. Yang;Richard M. Sherry;Patrick Hwu

  • Loss of PTEN Promotes Resistance to T Cell–Mediated Immunotherapy

    Weiyi Peng;Jie Qing Chen;Chengwen Liu;Shruti Malu

  • A phase I study on adoptive immunotherapy using gene-modified T cells for ovarian cancer

    Michael H. Kershaw;Michael H. Kershaw;Michael H. Kershaw;Jennifer A. Westwood;Jennifer A. Westwood;Linda L. Parker;Gang Wang;Gang Wang

  • PD-L1 Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    Elizabeth A Mittendorf;Anne V Philips;Funda Meric-Bernstam;Na Qiao

  • A Cancer Cell Program Promotes T Cell Exclusion and Resistance to Checkpoint Blockade

    Livnat Jerby-Arnon;Parin Shah;Michael S. Cuoco;Christopher Rodman

  • Loss of IFN-γ Pathway Genes in Tumor Cells as a Mechanism of Resistance to Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy

    Jianjun Gao;Lewis Zhichang Shi;Hao Zhao;Jianfeng Chen

  • gp100 peptide vaccine and interleukin-2 in patients with advanced melanoma.

    Douglas J. Schwartzentruber;David H. Lawson;Jon M. Richards;Robert M. Conry

  • BRAF inhibition is associated with enhanced melanoma antigen expression and a more favorable tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma

    Dennie Tompers Frederick;Adriano Piris;Alexandria P. Cogdill;Zachary A. Cooper

  • Randomized Study of High-Dose and Low-Dose Interleukin-2 in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cancer

    James C. Yang;Richard M. Sherry;Seth M. Steinberg;Suzanne L. Topalian

  • Analysis of Immune Signatures in Longitudinal Tumor Samples Yields Insight into Biomarkers of Response and Mechanisms of Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

    Pei Ling Chen;Whijae Roh;Alexandre Reuben;Zachary A. Cooper

  • T Helper 17 Cells Promote Cytotoxic T Cell Activation in Tumor Immunity

    Natalia Martin-Orozco;Pawel Muranski;Yeonseok Chung;Xuexian O. Yang

  • INDOLEAMINE 2,3-DIOXYGENASE PRODUCTION BY HUMAN DENDRITIC CELLS RESULTS IN THE INHIBITION OF T CELL PROLIFERATION

    Patrick Hwu;Mark X. Du;Réjean Lapointe;My Do

  • Regulation of B cell differentiation and plasma cell generation by IL-21, a novel inducer of Blimp-1 and Bcl-6

    Katsutoshi Ozaki;Katsutoshi Ozaki;Rosanne Spolski;Rachel Ettinger;Hyoung Fyo Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Davies
Michael A. Davies The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Chantale Bernatchez
Chantale Bernatchez The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Adi Diab
Adi Diab The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Laszlo Radvanyi
Laszlo Radvanyi Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Cara Haymaker
Cara Haymaker The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jennifer A. Wargo
Jennifer A. Wargo The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Willem W. Overwijk
Willem W. Overwijk The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Alexander J. Lazar
Alexander J. Lazar The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jason Roszik
Jason Roszik The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Medicine, several flexible online pathways can help fast-track your career or enable specialization. For registered nurses seeking advancement without extensive on-site training, there are rn to bsn programs no clinicals that offer a convenient, fully online option. These programs allow you to earn a BSN without the need for additional clinical hours.

Nurses aiming for leadership roles can explore the shortest msn to dnp program, which accelerates the journey from master’s to doctorate. For those prioritizing accessibility and work-life balance, the easiest dnp program online offers a more manageable approach to earning your DNP.

Entry-level roles are also available for those new to healthcare. You might consider fast track medical lpn options. These programs are designed to help you qualify as a Licensed Practical Nurse more quickly, offering a stepping stone into the nursing field.

Each of these online pathways supports diverse career goals, making it easier than ever to advance in the dynamic medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Hwu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles