What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of study are Pedagogy, Teacher education, Mathematics education, Higher education and Student teaching.
His work on Student teacher, Action research and Curriculum as part of general Pedagogy research is frequently linked to Perspective and Control, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
His study explores the link between Student teacher and topics such as Socialization that cross with problems in Teaching styles.
His study in Teacher education is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Teaching method, Educational research and Philosophy of education.
The concepts of his Mathematics education study are interwoven with issues in License and Social environment.
His Alternative teacher certification, Certificate in Education, Economics education and Comparative education study, which is part of a larger body of work in Higher education, is frequently linked to Board certification, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His most cited work include:
- Rethinking the Connections between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College- and University-Based Teacher Education (1220 citations)
- Studying Teacher Education : The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (1210 citations)
- Teaching Student Teachers to Reflect (1000 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Kenneth M. Zeichner mainly focuses on Pedagogy, Teacher education, Mathematics education, Higher education and Student teaching.
Kenneth M. Zeichner regularly ties together related areas like Democracy in his Pedagogy studies.
His work in Teacher education addresses issues such as Primary education, which are connected to fields such as Certificate in Education.
In the field of Mathematics education, his study on Reflective teaching and Practicum overlaps with subjects such as Variety and Reflection.
His Higher education study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Curriculum development and Cultural diversity.
Kenneth M. Zeichner has included themes like Field and Socialization in his Student teaching study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Pedagogy (73.72%)
- Teacher education (63.46%)
- Mathematics education (35.26%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Teacher education (63.46%)
- Pedagogy (73.72%)
- Mathematics education (35.26%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Teacher education, Pedagogy, Mathematics education, Social justice and Democracy.
Kenneth M. Zeichner combines topics linked to Publishing with his work on Teacher education.
His research integrates issues of Local community and Soul in his study of Pedagogy.
His Soul research includes elements of University system, Deregulation and Accountability.
His Mathematics education study combines topics in areas such as Bureaucracy and School system.
The Teaching method study combines topics in areas such as Participant observation and Curriculum.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The Turn Once Again Toward Practice-Based Teacher Education: (267 citations)
- Democratizing Teacher Education (168 citations)
- The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA (88 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Education
- Law
- Social science
His main research concerns Teacher education, Pedagogy, Social justice, Work and Democracy.
His Teacher education research incorporates themes from China and Economic competition.
His Pedagogy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Neoliberalism and Soul.
Kenneth M. Zeichner interconnects Deregulation, Accountability and University system in the investigation of issues within Soul.
His Democracy study typically links adjacent topics like Mathematics education.
He has researched Mathematics education in several fields, including Educational development and Deliberative democracy.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
