World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 83 1023 921 467 399 201 18435

Annette W. Fothergill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annette W. Fothergill between 1990 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annette W. Fothergill published across 29 years, from 1990 to 2018, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 2 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication
1990 2018

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annette W. Fothergill: publications per year, 1990 to 2018
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 6
1995 4
1996 5
1997 7
1998 10
1999 6
2000 10
2001 3
2002 8
2003 3
2004 6
2005 14
2006 2
2007 10
2008 12
2009 14
2010 10
2011 19
2012 8
2013 13
2014 13
2015 9
2016 9
2017 1
2018 1
Total 207
Download as CSV

Annette W. Fothergill publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annette W. Fothergill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 201 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234 201
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Annette W. Fothergill D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annette W. Fothergill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77 83
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Annette W. Fothergill is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio in the United States. Their work is situated within this institution, contributing to its academic and research environment.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications available in the current data regarding this researcher. Similarly, no specific main or subfields of study have been documented, nor are there identified main topics of work associated with their research output.

There is no record of awards or honors attributed to Annette W. Fothergill in the available information. The researcher is currently listed as active and not deceased.

Best Publications

  • Infections Caused by Scedosporium spp.

    Karoll J. Cortez;Emmanuel Roilides;Flavio Quiroz-Telles;Joseph Meletiadis

  • Fungal rhinosinusitis: A categorization and definitional schema addressing current controversies

    Arunaloke Chakrabarti;David W. Denning;Berrylin J. Ferguson;Jens Ponikau

  • MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY, MULTILOCUS HAPLOTYPE NOMENCLATURE, AND IN VITRO ANTIFUNGAL RESISTANCE WITHIN THE FUSARIUM SOLANI SPECIES COMPLEX

    Kerry O'Donnell;Deanna A. Sutton;Annette Fothergill;Dora McCarthy

  • Guide to Clinically Significant Fungi

    Deanna A. Sutton;Annette W. Fothergill;Michael G. Rinaldi

  • In Vitro Activities of Posaconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole, Amphotericin B, and Fluconazole against 37 Clinical Isolates of Zygomycetes

    Qiu N. Sun;Annette W. Fothergill;Dora I. McCarthy;Michael G. Rinaldi;Michael G. Rinaldi

  • Resistance of Candida albicans to Fluconazole During Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in a Patient with AIDS: Documentation by In Vitro Susceptibility Testing and DNA Subtype Analysis

    S. Redding;J. Smith;J. Smith;G. Farinacci;G. Farinacci;M. Rinaldi;M. Rinaldi

  • Comparative and collaborative evaluation of standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi.

    A Espinel-Ingroff;K Dawson;M Pfaller;E Anaissie

  • In Vitro Susceptibilities of 217 Clinical Isolates of Zygomycetes to Conventional and New Antifungal Agents

    Nikolaos G. Almyroudis;Deanna A. Sutton;Annette W. Fothergill;Michael G. Rinaldi

  • In Vitro Amphotericin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus terreus, with a Head-to-Head Comparison to Voriconazole

    Deanna A. Sutton;Stephen E. Sanche;Sanjay G. Revankar;Annette W. Fothergill

  • Spectrum of Clinically Relevant Exophiala Species in the United States

    J. S. Zeng;J. S. Zeng;J. S. Zeng;D. A. Sutton;A. W. Fothergill;M. G. Rinaldi;M. G. Rinaldi

  • Multicenter evaluation of proposed standardized procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.

    A. Espinel-Ingroff;M. Bartlett;R. Bowden;N. X. Chin

  • Detection of Candida dubliniensis in Oropharyngeal Samples from Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients in North America by Primary CHROMagar Candida Screening and Susceptibility Testing of Isolates

    William R. Kirkpatrick;Sanjay G. Revankar;Robert K. Mcatee;Jose L. Lopez-Ribot

  • Testing Conditions for Determination of Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations of New and Established Antifungal Agents for Aspergillus spp.: NCCLS Collaborative Study

    A. Espinel-Ingroff;A. Fothergill;J. Peter;M. G. Rinaldi

  • Wild-Type MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for the Triazoles and Six Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method (M38-A2 Document)

    A. Espinel-Ingroff;D. J. Diekema;A. Fothergill;Elizabeth Johnson

  • Epidemiology of oropharyngeal Candida colonization and infection in patients receiving radiation for head and neck cancer.

    Spencer W. Redding;Richard C. Zellars;William R. Kirkpatrick;Robert K. McAtee

  • In Vitro Interaction of Caspofungin Acetate with Voriconazole against Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus spp.

    Sofia Perea;Gloria Gonzalez;Annette W. Fothergill;William R. Kirkpatrick

  • Interlaboratory Variability of Caspofungin MICs for Candida spp. Using CLSI and EUCAST Methods: Should the Clinical Laboratory Be Testing This Agent?

    A. Espinel-Ingroff;M. C. Arendrup;M. A. Pfaller;L. X. Bonfietti

  • Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii Species Complex: an International Study of Wild-Type Susceptibility Endpoint Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole

    A. Espinel-Ingroff;A.I. Aller;E. Canton;L.R. Castanon-Olivares

  • Antimicrobial susceptibility of Fusarium, Aspergillus, and other filamentous fungi isolated from keratitis.

    Prajna Lalitha;Brett L. Shapiro;Muthiah Srinivasan;Namperumalsamy Venkatesh Prajna

  • Wild-Type MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Amphotericin B and Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method (M38-A2 Document)

    A. Espinel-Ingroff;M. Cuenca-Estrella;A. Fothergill;J. Fuller

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael G. Rinaldi
Michael G. Rinaldi The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Deanna A. Sutton
Deanna A. Sutton The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Thomas F. Patterson
Thomas F. Patterson The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Nathan P. Wiederhold
Nathan P. Wiederhold The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Josep Guarro
Josep Guarro Rovira i Virgili University
Brian L. Wickes
Brian L. Wickes The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Thomas M. Lietman
Thomas M. Lietman University of California, San Francisco
Laura K. Najvar
Laura K. Najvar The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
John R. Graybill
John R. Graybill The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Francesco Barchiesi
Francesco Barchiesi Marche Polytechnic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career options. For those interested in healthcare administration, exploring the best fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs can be a practical and efficient way to enter the medical field. These programs offer streamlined training to support healthcare operations behind the scenes.

Students aiming for clinical roles may consider pursuing medical degrees online, which provide flexible pathways to becoming a licensed healthcare professional while balancing other commitments.

For those passionate about health at a community or population level, online public health masters programs easy to get into offer accessible opportunities to advance public health knowledge and leadership skills, crucial in today’s healthcare landscape.

Additionally, careers such as child life specialists combine healthcare knowledge with emotional support skills. Understanding how much does a child life specialist make can help prospective students gauge the financial rewards of this meaningful profession.

Best Scientists Citing Annette W. Fothergill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles