World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 75 1513 1368 660 572 396 18012

Nathan P. Wiederhold publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nathan P. Wiederhold between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nathan P. Wiederhold published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 17.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2016. 40 of the 418 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2016. 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 31 publications 2026: 9 publications
2003 2026

418 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nathan P. Wiederhold: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 7
2004 2
2005 8
2006 6
2007 6
2008 14
2009 16
2010 6
2011 3
2012 10
2013 12
2014 15
2015 24
2016 36
2017 33
2018 30
2019 21
2020 25
2021 30
2022 24
2023 35
2024 15
2025 31
2026 9
Total 418
Download as CSV

Nathan P. Wiederhold publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan P. Wiederhold sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 395–404 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 396 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44 396
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Nathan P. Wiederhold D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan P. Wiederhold sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66 75
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM)
  • Fellow of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM)
  • Fellow of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM)
  • Fellow of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM)
  • Fellow of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM)

Overview

Nathan P. Wiederhold is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio in the United States. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in the study of infectious diseases and fungal biology.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Fungal infections and studies
  • Plant pathogens and fungal diseases
  • Infectious diseases and mycology
  • Nail diseases and treatments
  • Mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions
  • Fungal biology and applications

Key subfields of study in their work include Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Cell Biology, Plant Science, and Small Animals. This multidisciplinary approach reflects the complexity of their research interests, particularly in medical mycology and fungal pathogen biology.

Their publication record includes several recent papers, among which are:

  • "Review of the Novel Investigational Antifungal Olorofim," 2020, Journal of Fungi
  • "The Antifungal Pipeline: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, Olorofim, Opelconazole, and Rezafungin," 2021, Drugs
  • "Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of rare yeast infections: an initiative of the ECMM in cooperation with ISHAM and ASM," 2021, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • "The importance of antimicrobial resistance in medical mycology," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "The genome of opportunistic fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum carries a unique set of lineage-specific chromosomes," 2020, Communications Biology

Their frequent co-authors include Connie Cañete-Gibas, Thomas F. Patterson, Hoja P. Patterson, Carmita Sanders, and George R. Thompson, highlighting collaborative efforts within the medical mycology and infectious diseases research communities.

Publications by Nathan P. Wiederhold appear regularly in journals such as the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, ClinMicroNow, Journal of Fungi, and bioRxiv. These venues are central platforms for disseminating research on clinical microbiology and antimicrobial therapies.

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM), an acknowledgment linked to their work in fungal infections and mycology, though the specific year of the award is not detailed.

Best Publications

  • Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

    Oliver A. Cornely;Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo;Dorothee Arenz;Sharon C. A. Chen

  • Antifungal resistance: current trends and future strategies to combat.

    Nathan P Wiederhold

  • The Antifungal Pipeline: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, Olorofim, Opelconazole, and Rezafungin.

    Martin Hoenigl;Martin Hoenigl;Rosanne Sprute;Matthias Egger;Amir Arastehfar

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 469-557

    Pedro W. Crous;Pedro W. Crous;Michael J. Wingfield;Treena I. Burgess;G. E.St J. Hardy

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 400–468

    P. W. Crous;P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;D. M. Richardson;J. J. Le Roux

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 320–370

    P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;J. Guarro;M. Hernández-Restrepo

  • The importance of antimicrobial resistance in medical mycology

    Unknown

  • F901318 represents a novel class of antifungal drug that inhibits dihydroorotate dehydrogenase

    Jason D. Oliver;Graham E. M. Sibley;Nicola Beckmann;Katharine S. Dobb

  • Pharmacodynamics of Polymyxin B against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Vincent H. Tam;Amy N. Schilling;Giao Vo;Samer Kabbara

  • Pharmacodynamics of Caspofungin in a Murine Model of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis: Evidence of Concentration-Dependent Activity

    Nathan P. Wiederhold;Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis;Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis;Jingduan Chi;Randall A. Prince;Randall A. Prince

  • Fungal infections in animals: A patchwork of different situations

    Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi;Sandra de M. G. Bosco;Sybren de Hoog;Frank Ebel

  • Detection of Gliotoxin in Experimental and Human Aspergillosis

    Russell E. Lewis;Russell E. Lewis;Nathan P. Wiederhold;Nathan P. Wiederhold;Jingduan Chi;Xiang-Yang Han

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 558-624

    P.W. Crous;M.J. Wingfield;T.I. Burgess;G.E.St.J. Hardy

  • Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae.

    N. Valenzuela-Lopez;J. F. Cano-Lira;J. Guarro;Deanna A Sutton

  • Development of Caspofungin Resistance following Prolonged Therapy for Invasive Candidiasis Secondary to Candida glabrata Infection

    George Richard Thompson;Nathan P. Wiederhold;Nathan P. Wiederhold;Ana C. Vallor;Nyria C. Villareal

  • The echinocandin antifungals: an overview of the pharmacology, spectrum and clinical efficacy.

    Nathan P Wiederhold;Russell E Lewis

  • Molecular diagnostics in medical mycology

    Brian L. Wickes;Nathan P. Wiederhold

  • Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of rare yeast infections: an initiative of the ECMM in cooperation with ISHAM and ASM

    Sharon C-A Chen;John Perfect;Arnaldo L Colombo;Oliver A Cornely

  • First Detection of TR34 L98H and TR46 Y121F T289A Cyp51 Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates in the United States

    Nathan P. Wiederhold;Veronica Garcia Gil;Felipe Gutierrez;Jonathan R. Lindner

  • Cladosporium Species Recovered from Clinical Samples in the United States

    Marcelo Sandoval-Denis;Deanna A. Sutton;Adela Martin-Vicente;José F. Cano-Lira

  • International Evaluation of MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Value (ECV) Definitions for Fusarium Species Identified by Molecular Methods for the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method.

    A. Espinel-Ingroff;A. L. Colombo;S. Cordoba;P. J. Dufresne

  • Attenuation of the Activity of Caspofungin at High Concentrations against Candida albicans: Possible Role of Cell Wall Integrity and Calcineurin Pathways

    Nathan P. Wiederhold;Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis;Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis;Randall A. Prince;Randall A. Prince;Russell E. Lewis;Russell E. Lewis

  • Genome-wide expression profiling reveals genes associated with amphotericin B and fluconazole resistance in experimentally induced antifungal resistant isolates of Candida albicans

    Katherine S. Barker;Sarah Crisp;Nathan P Wiederhold;Russell E. Lewis

  • Isavuconazole: A comprehensive review of spectrum of activity of a new triazole

    George Richard Thompson;Nathan P. Wiederhold;Nathan P. Wiederhold

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas F. Patterson
Thomas F. Patterson The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Deanna A. Sutton
Deanna A. Sutton The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Josep Guarro
Josep Guarro Rovira i Virgili University
Laura K. Najvar
Laura K. Najvar The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Russell E. Lewis
Russell E. Lewis University of Padua
Annette W. Fothergill
Annette W. Fothergill The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Brian L. Wickes
Brian L. Wickes The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis
Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Josepa Gené
Josepa Gené Rovira i Virgili University
Ashraf S. Ibrahim
Ashraf S. Ibrahim University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in microbiology, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. One promising pathway is becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner programs graduate, blending microbiology knowledge with advanced patient care and holistic health approaches.

Another important field connected to microbiology is medical coding. Pursuing certification as a CPC can lead to roles that require a strong understanding of medical terminology and biology, essential skills for interpreting clinical documents accurately.

Health information management is also a vital sector that complements microbiology studies. For those aiming for an administrative role, investigating the health information management salary entry-level can provide insight into realistic career expectations and advancement opportunities.

To kickstart a career in this area, students should consider enrolling in online health information management programs cahiim accredited. These programs offer accredited training that meets industry standards, ensuring graduates are well-prepared for the evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan P. Wiederhold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles