What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Microbiology, Biofilm, Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans and Genetics.
His Microbiology research integrates issues from Klebsiella and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
His studies deal with areas such as Antifungal and Saliva as well as Biofilm.
The various areas that Brian L. Wickes examines in his Candida albicans study include In vitro and Yeast.
His Cryptococcus neoformans study combines topics in areas such as Cryptococcus, Mating type, Cryptococcosis and Virulence.
His Corpus albicans research includes themes of Formazan and Mutant.
His most cited work include:
- The Genome of the Basidiomycetous Yeast and Human Pathogen Cryptococcus Neoformans (626 citations)
- Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms. (563 citations)
- Inhibition of Candida albicans Biofilm Formation by Farnesol, a Quorum-Sensing Molecule (512 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Microbiology, Cryptococcus neoformans, Genetics, Pathology and Gene.
His Microbiology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Fungal genetics and Biofilm.
The concepts of his Biofilm study are interwoven with issues in In vitro and Caspofungin.
Brian L. Wickes combines subjects such as Cryptococcus, Cryptococcosis, Hypha, Mating type and Virulence with his study of Cryptococcus neoformans.
His study on Genetics is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Aspergillus fumigatus.
As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Candida albicans, narrowing it down to issues related to the Fluconazole, and often Amphotericin B.
He most often published in these fields:
- Microbiology (53.71%)
- Cryptococcus neoformans (21.14%)
- Genetics (17.14%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?
- Microbiology (53.71%)
- Pathology (13.71%)
- Internal transcribed spacer (5.14%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Brian L. Wickes mainly investigates Microbiology, Pathology, Internal transcribed spacer, Identification and Internal medicine.
His work in Microbiology addresses issues such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, which are connected to fields such as Phenotype, Susceptibility testing, High mortality and Lung transplant recipient.
His research integrates issues of Microbiome, Stachybotrys cylindrospora, Stachybotrys and Stachybotrys chartarum in his study of Pathology.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Developing country and Molecular diagnostics.
His Internal medicine research includes elements of Point of care and Pathogen.
He has researched Clade in several fields, including Fluconazole and Genotype.
Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The Case for Adopting the "Species Complex" Nomenclature for the Etiologic Agents of Cryptococcosis. (231 citations)
- Fungal Planet description sheets: 214–280 (209 citations)
- Fungal Planet 280 – 10 June 2014 (100 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Brian L. Wickes spends much of his time researching Microbiology, Identification, Molecular diagnostics, Immunology and Internal medicine.
Brian L. Wickes is interested in Susceptibility testing, which is a field of Microbiology.
The Identification study combines topics in areas such as CRISPR, Medical mycology, Invasive Mycoses, Intensive care medicine and Clinical microbiology.
His study in Molecular diagnostics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Pythiosis, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Total body surface area, Pathology and Saksenaea vasiformis.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Lung transplantation, Lung, Transplantation, Cystic fibrosis and Rasamsonia in addition to Immunology.
His Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Echinocandin and Candida auris.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
