World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maiken Cavling Arendrup

Maiken Cavling Arendrup

Award Badge
Microbiology
Denmark
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 88 749 664 10 10 315 31967

Maiken Cavling Arendrup publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maiken Cavling Arendrup between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maiken Cavling Arendrup published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2011. 23 of the 339 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2011. 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1986 2025

339 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maiken Cavling Arendrup: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 4
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 4
1992 3
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 4
2007 13
2008 11
2009 17
2010 15
2011 23
2012 23
2013 17
2014 15
2015 15
2016 8
2017 17
2018 17
2019 20
2020 20
2021 15
2022 22
2023 14
2024 11
2025 12
Total 339
Download as CSV

Maiken Cavling Arendrup publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maiken Cavling Arendrup sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 315–324 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 315 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106 315
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Maiken Cavling Arendrup D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maiken Cavling Arendrup sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32 88
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Microbiology in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Maiken Cavling Arendrup is affiliated with Statens Serum Institut in Denmark and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on infectious diseases and epidemiology.

Their research spans several interconnected fields, including:

  • Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Cell Biology
  • Small Animals
  • Plant Science

Maiken Cavling Arendrup's main research topics cover a range of areas related to fungal biology and infectious diseases, including:

  • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • Infectious Diseases and Mycology
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Their frequently published venues reflect a strong presence in the mycology and antimicrobial research community, with multiple publications in:

  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
  • Journal of Fungi
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection
  • Mycoses

Among Maiken Cavling Arendrup's recent scientific papers are:

  • How to interpret MICs of antifungal compounds according to the revised clinical breakpoints v. 10.0 European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST), 2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
  • How to: perform antifungal susceptibility testing of microconidia-forming dermatophytes following the new reference EUCAST method E.Def 11.0, exemplified by Trichophyton, 2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Other prominent papers related to their field but authored by other researchers include:

  • Emergence of methicillin resistance predates the clinical use of antibiotics, 2022, Nature
  • Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of candidiasis: an initiative of the ECMM in cooperation with ISHAM and ASM, 2025, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • The one health problem of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: current insights and future research agenda, 2020, Fungal Biology Reviews

Maiken Cavling Arendrup has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, indicating active engagement in research partnerships. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Joseph Meletiadis
  • Karin Meinike Jørgensen
  • Rasmus Krøger Hare
  • Jesús Guinea
  • Sevtap Arıkan-Akdağlı

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline

    A. J. Ullmann;J. M. Aguado;S. Arikan-Akdagli;D. W. Denning

  • Invasive candidiasis

    Unknown

  • ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients.

    O.A. Cornely;M. Bassetti;T. Calandra;J. Garbino

  • Invasive Candidiasis

    Unknown

  • Frequency and Evolution of Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus Associated with Treatment Failure

    Susan J. Howard;Dasa Cerar;Michael J. Anderson;Ahmed Albarrag

  • EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.1: method for the determination of broth dilution MICs of antifungal agents for fermentative yeasts.

    J.L. Rodriguez-Tudela;M.C. Arendrup;F. Barchiesi;J. Bille

  • ESCMID† and ECMM‡ joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis 2013

    O.A. Cornely;S. Arikan-Akdagli;E. Dannaoui;A.H. Groll

  • Multidrug-Resistant Candida: Epidemiology, Molecular Mechanisms, and Treatment

    Maiken Cavling Arendrup;Thomas F Patterson

  • EUCAST technical note on the EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.2: method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for yeasts EDef 7.2 (EUCAST-AFST)*

    Maiken C. Arendrup;Manuel Cuenca-Estrella;Cornelia Lass-Flörl;William Hope

  • ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of rare invasive yeast infections

    M.C. Arendrup;T. Boekhout;T. Boekhout;T. Boekhout;M. Akova;J.F. Meis

  • Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis.

    Maiken C Arendrup

  • ESCMID and ECMM joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of hyalohyphomycosis: Fusarium spp., Scedosporium spp. and others

    A.M. Tortorano;M. Richardson;E. Roilides;A. van Diepeningen

  • ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012:diagnostic procedures

    M. Cuenca-Estrella;P. E Verweij;M. C Arendrup;S. Arikan-Akdagli

  • How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art

    Brigitte Lamy;Sylvie Dargère;Maiken C. Arendrup;Jean-Jacques Parienti

  • ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: prevention and management of invasive infections in neonates and children caused by Candida spp

    W.W. Hope;E. Castagnola;A.H. Groll;E. Roilides

  • ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: adults with haematological malignancies and after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT)

    A.J. Ullmann;M. Akova;R. Herbrecht;C. Viscoli

  • Prospective multicenter international surveillance of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus.

    J W M van der Linden;M C Arendrup;A Warris;Katrien Lagrou

  • Clinical breakpoints for the echinocandins and Candida revisited: Integration of molecular, clinical, and microbiological data to arrive at species-specific interpretive criteria

    M.A. Pfaller;D.J. Diekema;D. Andes;M.C. Arendrup

  • Emergence of methicillin resistance predates the clinical use of antibiotics

    Unknown

  • ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of systemic phaeohyphomycosis: diseases caused by black fungi

    A. Chowdhary;J. F. Meis;J. Guarro;G. S. de Hoog

  • Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem?

    Maiken Cavling Arendrup;David S. Perlin

  • International expert opinion on the management of infection caused by azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus.

    Paul E. Verweij;Michelle Ananda-Rajah;David Andes;Maiken C. Arendrup

  • Management of invasive candidiasis and candidemia in adult non-neutropenic intensive care unit patients: Part I. Epidemiology and diagnosis.

    Benoît P. Guery;Maiken C. Arendrup;Georg Auzinger;Élie Azoulay

Frequent Co-Authors

Manuel Cuenca-Estrella
Manuel Cuenca-Estrella Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Joseph Meletiadis
Joseph Meletiadis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Paul E. Verweij
Paul E. Verweij Radboud University
William W. Hope
William W. Hope University of Liverpool
Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Cornelia Lass-Flörl Innsbruck Medical University
Helle Krogh Johansen
Helle Krogh Johansen University of Copenhagen
Oliver A. Cornely
Oliver A. Cornely University of Cologne
David W. Denning
David W. Denning University of Manchester
Emmanuel Roilides
Emmanuel Roilides Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying microbiology opens doors to various related fields that integrate biology, technology, and healthcare. Many students explore interdisciplinary options to broaden their career scope. For example, becoming a functional medicine NP allows microbiology graduates to apply their knowledge in patient-centered, holistic healthcare settings.

Another growing area involves medical coding and billing, where the cpc certification is critical for accuracy and compliance. This credential enhances job prospects in healthcare administration, reflecting the increasing demand for skilled professionals who can interpret medical data precisely.

Healthcare data management is also a prominent career pathway. Professionals with a background in microbiology may pursue health information roles, where understanding scientific data is essential. For insights on this career, the health information management salary reports provide valuable guidance on the financial outlook and growth opportunities.

For those interested in formal education in this area, the best cahiim accredited him programs online offer flexible options to gain recognized credentials in health information management, complementing a microbiology degree effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Maiken Cavling Arendrup

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles