World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
15093
World Ranking
11249
National Ranking
4870

Joshua D. Lambert publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua D. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 166 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Joshua D. Lambert D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua D. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joshua D. Lambert is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within Medicine and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. The main subfields of study include Plant Science, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Food Science.

Their work covers a variety of research topics, such as:

  • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Tea Polyphenols and Effects
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Garlic and Onion Studies
  • Berberine and Alkaloids Research
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Joshua D. Lambert has published frequently in several academic journals. The most common publication venues include:

  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
  • Journal of Food Science
  • Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
  • Frontiers in Plant Science

Their recent scientific papers demonstrate a focus on nutritional biochemistry, plant resistance factors, and toxicology related to food and health. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Dietary cocoa ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and increases markers of antioxidant response and mitochondrial biogenesis in high fat-fed mice" (2021, The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry)
  • "Clovamide, a Hydroxycinnamic Acid Amide, Is a Resistance Factor Against Phytophthora spp. in Theobroma cacao" (2020, Frontiers in Plant Science)
  • "Duckweed protein supports the growth and organ development of mice: A feeding study comparison to conventional casein protein" (2021, Journal of Food Science)
  • "Impact of Atomizer Age and Flavor on In Vitro Toxicity of Aerosols from a Third-Generation Electronic Cigarette against Human Oral Cells" (2020, Chemical Research in Toxicology)
  • "Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Inoculation of Two Lettuce Cultivars Affects Leaf and Root Growth under Hydroponic Conditions" (2022, Applied Sciences)

Collaborations appear frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Daphne Weikart
  • Andrew P. Neilson
  • Eric P. Burkhart
  • Vijaya Indukuri
  • Kathryn Racine

Best Publications

  • The antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities of green tea polyphenols: a role in cancer prevention

    Joshua D. Lambert;Ryan J. Elias

  • The Major Green Tea Polyphenol, (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate, Inhibits Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, and Fatty Liver Disease in High-Fat–Fed Mice

    Mousumi Bose;Joshua D. Lambert;Jihyeung Ju;Kenneth R. Reuhl

  • Mechanisms of Cancer Prevention by Tea Constituents

    Joshua D. Lambert;Chung S. Yang

  • Inhibition of carcinogenesis by polyphenols: evidence from laboratory investigations

    Joshua D. Lambert;Jungil Hong;Guang Yu Yang;Jie Liao

  • The chemistry and biotransformation of tea constituents.

    Shengmin Sang;Joshua D. Lambert;Chi Tang Ho;Chung S. Yang

  • Cancer chemopreventive activity and bioavailability of tea and tea polyphenols

    Joshua D Lambert;Chung S Yang

  • Hepatotoxicity of High Oral Dose (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate in Mice

    Joshua D. Lambert;Mary J. Kennett;Shengmin Sang;Kenneth R. Reuhl

  • Antioxidative and anti-carcinogenic activities of tea polyphenols.

    Chung S. Yang;Joshua D. Lambert;Shengmin Sang

  • The role of antioxidant versus pro-oxidant effects of green tea polyphenols in cancer prevention.

    Sarah C. Forester;Joshua D. Lambert

  • Tea and cancer prevention: molecular mechanisms and human relevance.

    Chung S. Yang;Joshua D. Lambert;Jihyeung Ju;Gang Lu

  • Bioavailability issues in studying the health effects of plant polyphenolic compounds.

    Chung S. Yang;Shengmin Sang;Joshua D. Lambert;Mao Jung Lee

  • Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Is Absorbed but Extensively Glucuronidated Following Oral Administration to Mice

    Joshua D. Lambert;Mao Jung Lee;Hong Lu;Xiaofeng Meng

  • Possible Controversy Over Dietary Polyphenols: Benefits vs Risks

    Joshua D. Lambert;Shengmin Sang;Chung S. Yang

  • Piperine enhances the bioavailability of the tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in mice

    Joshua D. Lambert;Jungil Hong;Dou Hwan Kim;Vladimir M. Mishin

  • Biotransformation of Green Tea Polyphenols and the Biological Activities of Those Metabolites

    Joshua D. Lambert;Shengmin Sang;Chung S. Yang

  • Effects of tea polyphenols on signal transduction pathways related to cancer chemoprevention.

    Zhe Hou;Joshua D. Lambert;Khew Voon Chin;Chung S. Yang

  • Laboratory, Epidemiological, and Human Intervention Studies Show That Tea (Camellia sinensis) May Be Useful in the Prevention of Obesity

    Kimberly A. Grove;Joshua D. Lambert

  • Weight control and prevention of metabolic syndrome by green tea

    Sudathip Sae-tan;Kimberly A. Grove;Joshua D. Lambert

  • Delivery of tea polyphenols to the oral cavity by green tea leaves and black tea extract.

    Mao Jung Lee;Joshua D. Lambert;Saileta Prabhu;Xiaofeng Meng

  • The Major Green Tea Polyphenol, (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate, Inhibits Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, and Fatty Liver Disease

    Mousumi Bose;Joshua D. Lambert;Jihyeung Ju;Kenneth R. Reuhl

Frequent Co-Authors

Chung S. Yang
Chung S. Yang Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Shengmin Sang
Shengmin Sang North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
Chi-Tang Ho
Chi-Tang Ho Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Hang Xiao
Hang Xiao University of Massachusetts Amherst
Barbara N. Timmermann
Barbara N. Timmermann University of Kansas
Penny M. Kris-Etherton
Penny M. Kris-Etherton Pennsylvania State University
Matam Vijay-Kumar
Matam Vijay-Kumar University of Toledo
Dennis R. Burton
Dennis R. Burton Scripps Research Institute
Ruth E. Stark
Ruth E. Stark City College of New York
Robert B. Beelman
Robert B. Beelman Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a range of interdisciplinary careers. Many students and professionals look to related fields such as exercise science and kinesiology for practical applications of biological principles. Programs like the best online exercise science degree equip graduates for roles in health, sports, and wellness. Similarly, pursuing an online kinesiology degree can lead to opportunities in therapy, rehabilitation, or sports management.

For those interested in advanced healthcare careers, there are specialized online certifications to consider. Completing the fastest pmhnp program can fast-track your path to becoming a psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner. Alternatively, the post masters np program is ideal for professionals seeking to expand into family nursing practice. These online pathways offer flexibility and can complement a foundation in biology or biochemistry, helping you position yourself for diverse and rewarding careers in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua D. Lambert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles