World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 57 10900 9841 92 88 150 47836

Jan H. Jensen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan H. Jensen between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan H. Jensen published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2025. 19 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2025. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 18 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan H. Jensen: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 8
1996 5
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 5
2001 3
2002 5
2003 5
2004 4
2005 3
2006 9
2007 7
2008 9
2009 4
2010 3
2011 6
2012 4
2013 13
2014 6
2015 7
2016 10
2017 11
2018 12
2019 3
2020 2
2021 9
2022 15
2023 13
2024 16
2025 18
2026 1
Total 228
Download as CSV

Jan H. Jensen publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan H. Jensen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 150 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 150
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan H. Jensen D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan H. Jensen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051 57
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan H. Jensen is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and has contributed extensively to the fields of Chemistry and Materials Science.

Their research spans several subfields, including Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Inorganic Chemistry. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the variety of topics they have explored, such as Machine Learning in Materials Science, Computational Drug Discovery Methods, Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis, Chemical Synthesis and Analysis, Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions, Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography, and Chemical Reaction Mechanisms.

Jensen has published multiple papers in well-regarded venues, with frequent publications in:

  • PeerJ Physical Chemistry
  • Journal of Cheminformatics
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Digital Discovery

Among their recent published works are:

  • Chemical space exploration: how genetic algorithms find the needle in the haystack, 2020, PeerJ Physical Chemistry
  • Computational Evolution Of New Catalysts For The Morita-Baylis-Hillman Reaction, 2023, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Fast and automatic estimation of transition state structures using tight binding quantum chemical calculations, 2020, PeerJ Physical Chemistry
  • Using a genetic algorithm to find molecules with good docking scores, 2021, PeerJ Physical Chemistry
  • RegioSQM20: improved prediction of the regioselectivity of electrophilic aromatic substitutions, 2021, Journal of Cheminformatics

The scientist frequently collaborates with a consistent group of coauthors, including Julius Seumer, Nicolai Ree, Maria H. Rasmussen, Casper Steinmann, and Andreas H. Göller, collectively contributing to various research projects.

Best Publications

  • General atomic and molecular electronic structure system

    Michael W. Schmidt;Kim K. Baldridge;Jerry A. Boatz;Steven T. Elbert

  • PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa Predictions

    Mats H. M. Olsson;Chresten R. Søndergaard;Michal Rostkowski;Jan H. Jensen

  • Very fast empirical prediction and rationalization of protein pKa values

    Hui Li;Andrew D. Robertson;Jan H. Jensen

  • Improved Treatment of Ligands and Coupling Effects in Empirical Calculation and Rationalization of pKa Values.

    Chresten R. Søndergaard;Mats H. M. Olsson;Michał Rostkowski;Jan H. Jensen

  • PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations

    Todd J. Dolinsky;Paul Czodrowski;Hui Li;Jens E. Nielsen

  • Very fast prediction and rationalization of pKa values for protein-ligand complexes.

    Delphine C. Bas;David M. Rogers;Jan H. Jensen

  • An effective fragment method for modeling solvent effects in quantum mechanical calculations

    Paul N. Day;Jan H. Jensen;Mark S. Gordon;Simon P. Webb

  • On the Number of Water Molecules Necessary To Stabilize the Glycine Zwitterion

    Jan H. Jensen;Mark S. Gordon

  • Graphical analysis of pH-dependent properties of proteins predicted using PROPKA

    Michał Rostkowski;Mats H M Olsson;Chresten R Søndergaard;Jan H Jensen

  • A graph-based genetic algorithm and generative model/Monte Carlo tree search for the exploration of chemical space

    Jan H. Jensen

  • Chapter 10 The Effective Fragment Potential: A General Method for Predicting Intermolecular Interactions

    Mark S. Gordon;Lyudmilla Slipchenko;Hui Li;Jan H. Jensen

  • The conformational potential energy surface of glycine : a theoretical study

    Jan H. Jensen;Mark S. Gordon

  • Understanding the Hydrogen Bond Using Quantum Chemistry

    Mark S. Gordon;Jan H. Jensen

  • Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands

    Antoine Kremer;Jean Luc Dupouey;J. Douglas Deans;Joan Cottrell

  • FTIR Spectroscopy Combined with Isotope Labeling and Quantum Chemical Calculations to Investigate Adsorbed Bicarbonate Formation Following Reaction of Carbon Dioxide with Surface Hydroxyl Groups on Fe2O3 and Al2O3.

    Jonas Baltrusaitis;Jan H. Jensen;Vicki H. Grassian

  • Evaluation of Charge Penetration Between Distributed Multipolar Expansions

    Mark Alan Freitag;Mark S. Gordon;Jan H. Jensen;Walter J. Stevens

  • Prediction and rationalization of protein pKa values using QM and QM/MM methods.

    Jan H. Jensen;Hui Li;and Andrew D. Robertson;Pablo A. Molina

  • The polarizable continuum model (PCM) interfaced with the fragment molecular orbital method (FMO)

    Dmitri G. Fedorov;Kazuo Kitaura;Hui Li;Jan H. Jensen

  • Determinants of the relative reduction potentials of type-1 copper sites in proteins.

    Hui Li;Simon P. Webb;Joseph Ivanic;Jan H. Jensen

  • QM/MM Boundaries Across Covalent Bonds: A Frozen Localized Molecular Orbital-Based Approach for the Effective Fragment Potential Method

    Visvaldas Kairys;Jan H. Jensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Gordon
Mark S. Gordon Iowa State University
Dmitri G. Fedorov
Dmitri G. Fedorov National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
Kazuo Kitaura
Kazuo Kitaura Kyoto University
Jesper Nygård
Jesper Nygård University of Copenhagen
Thomas Willum Hansen
Thomas Willum Hansen Technical University of Denmark
Per Halfdan Nielsen
Per Halfdan Nielsen University of Copenhagen
Carsten Christophersen
Carsten Christophersen University of Copenhagen
Sine Larsen
Sine Larsen University of Copenhagen
Mads Brandbyge
Mads Brandbyge Technical University of Denmark
Kim K. Baldridge
Kim K. Baldridge Tianjin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career paths. Many students consider complementary fields such as criminal justice, where understanding scientific principles can enhance roles in forensic science and legal investigations. For those starting out, an criminal justice associate degree online offers a flexible and affordable route to enter the field.

Cost is an important factor when choosing a program. To get a clearer picture, research on how much is criminal justice school can help you compare tuition fees and additional expenses associated with online degrees.

Graduates with legal knowledge combined with scientific expertise can pursue paralegal careers in specialized sectors. Understanding the different types of paralegals and salaries is valuable for assessing potential opportunities and income levels in this field.

Another promising career on the horizon for chemistry students is pharmaceutical sales. This path blends scientific knowledge with communication skills. To gauge industry prospects, learning how much do pharmaceutical sales reps make offers insight into expected earnings and growth opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Jan H. Jensen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles