World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
17051
World Ranking
6560
National Ranking
3169

Jone L. Pearce publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jone L. Pearce sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jone L. Pearce D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jone L. Pearce sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management

Overview

Jone L. Pearce is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily resides within the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. Pearce's work spans various subfields including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, and Marketing.

The scientist has contributed to understanding topics such as Gender Diversity and Inequality, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Environmental Sustainability in Business, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Social and Intergroup Psychology, and Social Media and Politics.

Jone L. Pearce's recent papers include:

  • "Broadening Our Understanding of Human Resource Management for Improved Environmental Performance" (2021, Business & Society)
  • "Do you pass it on? An examination of the consequences of perceived cyber incivility" (2020, Organization Management Journal)
  • "Favoritism in the Federal Workplace: Are Rules the Solution?" (2023, Review of Public Personnel Administration)
  • "Advocacy and the Search for Truth in Management Scholarship: Can the Twain Ever Meet?" (2023, Journal of Management Inquiry)
  • "Supporting resolution: the impact of supervisors on workplace conflict management" (2025, International Journal of Conflict Management)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Pearce include:

  • Carrie Wang
  • Cornelia Pechmann
  • Florencio F. Portocarrero
  • Anne-Laure P. Winkler
  • Kimberly McCarthy

Jone L. Pearce has published multiple times in venues such as the Journal of Management Inquiry, Business & Society, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Organization Management Journal, and International Journal of Conflict Management.

The scientist has received recognition as a Fellow of the British Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support

    Katherine K. Xin;Jone L. Pearce

  • Alternative Approaches to the Employee-Organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off?

    Anne S. Tsui;Jone L. Pearce;Lyman W. Porter;Angela M. Tripoli

  • Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust

    Gregory A. Bigley;Jone L. Pearce

  • Volunteers: The Organizational Behavior of Unpaid Workers

    Jone L. Pearce

  • Task interdependence and extrarole behavior : a test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility

    Jone L. Pearce;Hal B. Gregersen

  • Toward an Organizational Behavior of Contract Laborers: Their Psychological Involvement and Effects on Employee Co-Workers.

    Jone L. Pearce

  • Managing the Unknowable: The Effectiveness of Early-stage Investor Gut Feel in Entrepreneurial Investment Decisions

    Laura Huang;Jone L. Pearce

  • Conditions Under Which Employees Respond Positively to Enriched Work.

    Greg R. Oldham;J. Richard Hackman;Jone L. Pearce

  • Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback

    Jone L. Pearce;Lyman W. Porter

  • Choice of employee-organization relationship: Influence of external and internal organizational factors

    JL Pearce;AS Tsui;LW Porter;JP Hite

  • The Concept of “Coalition” in Organization Theory and Research

    William B. Stevenson;Jone L. Pearce;Lyman W. Porter

  • Managerial Compensation Based on Organizational Performance: A Time Series Analysis of the Effects of Merit Pay

    Jone L. Pearce;William B. Stevenson;James L. Perry

  • Expectations of organizational mobility, workplace social inclusion, and employee job performance

    Jone L. Pearce;Amy E. Randel

  • Insufficient Bureaucracy: Trust and Commitment in Particularistic Organizations

    Jone L. Pearce;Imre Branyiczki;Gregory A. Bigley

  • Effects of changes in job characteristics on work attitudes and behaviors: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment☆

    J.Richard Hackman;Jone L. Pearce;Jane Caminis Wolfe

  • FEDERAL MERIT PAY - A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS

    Jone L. Pearce;James L. Perry

  • Differential perceptions of employers' inducements: implications for psychological contracts

    Lyman W. Porter;Jone L. Pearce;Angela M. Tripoli;Kristi M. Lewis

  • Job attitude and motivation differences between volunteers and employees from comparable organizations.

    Jone L. Pearce

  • The decreasing value of our research to management education

    Jone L. Pearce;Laura Huang

  • Person-based reward systems: A theory of organizational reward practices in reform-communist organizations

    Jone L. Pearce;Imre Branyiczki;Gyula Bakacsi

  • Bringing Some Clarity to Role Ambiguity Research

    Jone L. Pearce

Frequent Co-Authors

Lyman W. Porter
Lyman W. Porter University of California, Irvine
James L. Perry
James L. Perry Indiana University
Anne S. Tsui
Anne S. Tsui Arizona State University
J. Richard Hackman
J. Richard Hackman Harvard University
Denise M. Rousseau
Denise M. Rousseau Carnegie Mellon University
Hal B. Gregersen
Hal B. Gregersen Brigham Young University
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University
Glyn C. Roberts
Glyn C. Roberts Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Joan L. Duda
Joan L. Duda University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible pathways in Social Sciences and Humanities has boosted the popularity of online degrees. Prospective students often seek cost-effective options, like affordable online msw programs, allowing them to pursue advanced education in social work without the burden of high tuition costs.

For those interested in applied behavior analysis, bcba programs online provide an accessible route to certification while balancing work or family commitments. These programs are designed for students eager to advance their careers in behavioral health or education.

Time is also a significant factor. Many learners opt for an accelerated msw program online to finish their studies sooner and enter the workforce faster. Similarly, students looking to enter psychology fields quickly may explore a fast track bachelor degree in psychology, which can shorten the degree timeline without compromising quality.

Choosing the right program involves considering cost, speed, and accreditation. With various specialized online degrees now available, students can pursue meaningful career pathways in social sciences and humanities while fitting education into their lives.

Best Scientists Citing Jone L. Pearce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles