World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 63 1806 1623 905 798 127 14556

Janet Heasman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet Heasman between 1977 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet Heasman published across 40 years, from 1977 to 2016, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1985. 1 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1985. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
1977 2016

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet Heasman: publications per year, 1977 to 2016
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 1
1984 3
1985 7
1986 5
1987 5
1988 0
1989 3
1990 2
1991 2
1992 6
1993 4
1994 3
1995 3
1996 3
1997 7
1998 4
1999 6
2000 4
2001 5
2002 5
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 6
2007 6
2008 7
2009 5
2010 4
2011 5
2012 1
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
Total 131
Download as CSV

Janet Heasman publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Heasman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 127 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158 127
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet Heasman D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Heasman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105 63
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Janet Heasman is affiliated with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in the United States. The available information does not provide detailed insights into specific research areas, publication records, or collaborative networks for this scientist.

There are no listed recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Janet Heasman. Information on book publications or any awards is also not available. Similarly, there are no main fields of study, subfields, or principal research topics documented at this time.

This profile is based solely on the verified affiliation with a major medical research institution, indicating involvement in clinical or biomedical research, though specific areas of focus remain unspecified.

Best Publications

  • Morpholino oligos: making sense of antisense?

    Janet Heasman

  • Overexpression of cadherins and underexpression of β-catenin inhibit dorsal mesoderm induction in early Xenopus embryos

    Janet Heasman;Aaron Crawford;Kim Goldstone;Peggy Garner-Hamrick

  • βCatenin Signaling Activity Dissected in the Early Xenopus Embryo: A Novel Antisense Approach

    Janet Heasman;Matt Kofron;Chris Wylie

  • Maternal wnt11 activates the canonical wnt signaling pathway required for axis formation in Xenopus embryos.

    Qinghua Tao;Chika Yokota;Helbert Puck;Matt Kofron

  • The role of maternal VegT in establishing the primary germ layers in Xenopus embryos

    Jian Zhang;Douglas W Houston;Mary Lou King;Christopher Payne

  • The onset of germ cell migration in the mouse embryo.

    Robert Anderson;Trevor K. Copeland;Hans Schöler;Janet Heasman

  • Mesoderm induction in Xenopus is a zygotic event regulated by maternal VegT via TGFbeta growth factors

    Matt Kofron;Teresa Demel;Jenny Xanthos;Jamie Lohr

  • Migratory and postmigratory mouse primordial germ cells behave differently in culture

    Peter J. Donovan;David Stott;Linda A. Cairns;Janet Heasman

  • Patterning the Xenopus blastula

    Janet Heasman

  • Patterning the early Xenopus embryo

    Janet Heasman

  • Primordial germ cell migration.

    Kathleen Molyneaux;Christopher Wylie

  • Mouse primordial germ cells lacking beta1 integrins enter the germline but fail to migrate normally to the gonads.

    R. Anderson;R. Fassler;E. Georges-Labouesse;R.O. Hynes

  • Xklp1, a chromosomal Xenopus kinesin-like protein essential for spindle organization and chromosome positioning.

    Isabelle Vernos;Jos Raats;Tatsuya Hirano;Janet Heasman

  • Maternal VegT is the initiator of a molecular network specifying endoderm in Xenopus laevis

    J.B. Xanthos;M. Kofron;C. Wylie;J. Heasman

  • The mitochondrial cloud of Xenopus oocytes: The source of germinal granule material

    Janet Heasman;J. Quarmby;C.C. Wylie

  • Maternal beta-catenin establishes a ‘dorsal signal’ in early Xenopus embryos

    C. Wylie;M. Kofron;C. Payne;R. Anderson

  • Interactions between primordial germ cells play a role in their migration in mouse embryos

    M. Gomperts;M. Garcia-Castro;C. Wylie;J. Heasman

  • pygopus Encodes a nuclear protein essential for wingless/Wnt signaling.

    Tatyana Y. Belenkaya;Chun Han;Henrietta J. Standley;Xinda Lin

  • Genital ridges exert long-range effects on mouse primordial germ cell numbers and direction of migration in culture

    Isabelle Godin;Christopher Wylie;Janet Heasman

  • Primordial germ cells of Xenopus embryos: The role of fibronectin in their adhesion during migration

    Janet Heasman;Richard O. Hynes;Alma P. Swan;Valerie Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Wylie
Christopher Wylie Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
James C. Smith
James C. Smith The Francis Crick Institute
Brian H. Anderton
Brian H. Anderton King's College London
Charles ffrench-Constant
Charles ffrench-Constant University of Edinburgh
Peter S. Klein
Peter S. Klein University of Pennsylvania
Malcolm Whitman
Malcolm Whitman Harvard University
James A. Wells
James A. Wells University of California, San Francisco
Makoto Asashima
Makoto Asashima Teikyo University
Isabelle Vernos
Isabelle Vernos Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Molecular Biology opens doors to a diverse range of academic and professional opportunities. For students seeking flexibility, online degree programs provide an accessible way to pursue specialized fields and complementary disciplines.

Those interested in the intersection of biology and psychology may consider child psychology masters programs online. These programs prepare graduates to support the mental health needs of younger populations, integrating biological and psychological perspectives.

If you’re focused on counseling or human welfare, there are affordable options such as the cheapest masters in counseling online. For those aiming at clinical practice, pursuing an online masters in clinical psychology equips students for roles in behavioral research, therapy, and mental health support.

Broader social impact careers can also be launched by earning human services online degree programs. These degrees prepare graduates for work in healthcare organizations, non-profits, and community services, often in roles supporting at-risk families and individuals.

Pairing a background in Molecular Biology with online degrees in psychology, counseling, or human services can expand your career prospects in both research and applied health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Janet Heasman