World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 57 636 279 102 25925
Psychology 58 3777 2115 104 26010

Henry P. Sims publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henry P. Sims between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henry P. Sims published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1975. 2 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1975. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 8 publications 1976: 6 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1970 2025

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henry P. Sims: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 2
1975 8
1976 6
1977 4
1978 2
1979 2
1980 5
1981 4
1982 6
1983 1
1984 5
1985 3
1986 4
1987 3
1988 2
1989 3
1990 2
1991 4
1992 2
1993 4
1994 5
1995 2
1996 2
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 4
2004 0
2005 2
2006 2
2007 0
2008 3
2009 4
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 4
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 2
Total 113
Download as CSV

Henry P. Sims publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry P. Sims sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 100–104 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 102 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104 102
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Henry P. Sims D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry P. Sims sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44 57
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Henry P. Sims is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on education and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their recent publications include:

  • Quality and Impact at Scale (2025), published in the Journal of Student Affairs Inquiry Improvement and Impact
  • Assessing the Impact of Drawing in Biology Lecture Classes on Student Learning (2025), published in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education

The scientist collaborates frequently with colleagues including Samara Reynolds, Stephanie L. Madison, Sarah Layne, Chris Wilkinson, and Khoa Pham. Their work appears predominantly in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of Student Affairs Inquiry Improvement and Impact
  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education

Henry P. Sims's work addresses various main topics, notably in higher education and employability, reflective practices in education, higher education learning practices, innovative teaching methods, science education and pedagogy, and visual and cognitive learning processes.

  • Higher Education and Employability
  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Higher Education Learning Practices
  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Their research often intersects the fields of education and psychology, with particular attention to teaching methods and learning processes within higher education contexts. This interdisciplinary approach brings together aspects of cognitive psychology and pedagogical innovation.

Best Publications

  • Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication

    Ken G. Smith;Ken A. Smith;Judy D. Olian;Henry P. Sims

  • Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams.

    Charles C. Manz;Henry P. Sims

  • Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors.

    Craig L. Pearce;Henry P. Sims

  • Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus

    Don Knight;Craig L. Pearce;Ken G. Smith;Judy D. Olian

  • Self-Management as a Substitute for Leadership: A Social Learning Theory Perspective

    Charles C. Manz;Henry P. Sims

  • The Measurement of Job Characteristics

    Henry P. Sims;Andrew D. Szilagyi;Robert T. Keller

  • SuperLeadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership

    Charles C. Manz;Henry P. Sims

  • Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment

    W. Harvey Hegarty;Henry P. Sims

  • The New Superleadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves

    Charles C. Manz;Henry P. Sims

  • Behind the Mask: The Politics of Employee Appraisal

    Clinton O. Longenecker;Henry P. Sims;Dennis A. Gioia

  • Business Without Bosses: How Self-Managing Teams Are Building High- Performing Companies

    Charles C. Manz;Henry P. Sims

  • The thinking organization

    Henry P. Sims;Dennis A. Gioia

  • The New Leadership Paradigm: Social Learning and Cognition in Organizations

    Henry P. Sims Jr.;Peter Lorenzi

  • Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams

    Natalia M. Lorinkova;Matthew J. Pearsall;Henry P. Sims

  • Organizational philosophy, policies, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: A laboratory experiment.

    W. Harvey Hegarty;Henry P. Sims

  • Vicarious Learning: The Influence of Modeling on Organizational Behavior

    Charles C. Manz;Henry P. Sims

  • Just and Unjust Punishment: Influences on Subordinate Performance and Citizenship

    Gail A. Ball;Linda Klebe Trevino;Henry P. Sims

  • Transactors, Transformers and Beyond. A Multi-Method Development of a Theoretical Typology of Leadership.

    Craig L. Pearce;Henry P. Sims;Jonathan F. Cox;Gail Ball

  • Shared Leadership: Toward a Multi-Level Theory of Leadership

    Craig L. Pearce;Henry P. Sims

  • The forgotten follower: a contingency model of leadership and follower self‐leadership

    Seokhwa Yun;Jonathan Cox;Henry P. Sims

  • Empowered Selling Teams: How Shared Leadership Can Contribute to Selling Team Outcomes

    Monica L. Perry;Craig L. Pearce;Henry P. Sims

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles C. Manz
Charles C. Manz University of Massachusetts Amherst
Dennis A. Gioia
Dennis A. Gioia Pennsylvania State University
Craig L. Pearce
Craig L. Pearce Pennsylvania State University
Ken G. Smith
Ken G. Smith University of Maryland, College Park
Linda Klebe Treviño
Linda Klebe Treviño Pennsylvania State University
Samer Faraj
Samer Faraj McGill University
Robert T. Keller
Robert T. Keller University of Houston
David P. Lepak
David P. Lepak University of Massachusetts Amherst
Riki Takeuchi
Riki Takeuchi The University of Texas at Dallas
Miriam Erez
Miriam Erez Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management in the USA opens up a variety of online learning options designed for flexibility and career advancement. For those looking to accelerate their studies, accelerated programs offer a fast-track to graduation, allowing students to enter the workforce sooner or pivot careers efficiently.

If affordability and online access are priorities, consider researching the best business schools online. These programs combine strong academic standards with flexible schedules and often lower tuition, making them ideal for working professionals or those balancing other commitments.

As the healthcare industry continues to expand, many students are turning to a bachelors in health administration for entry-level roles in this dynamic field. For those seeking leadership and advanced opportunities, the most affordable online mha programs offer specialized training in healthcare management, policy, and operations.

Online degrees in business, management, and healthcare administration can pave the way for diverse and rewarding career pathways, all while accommodating busy lifestyles.

Best Scientists Citing Henry P. Sims

Recently Published Articles