World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
29905
World Ranking
17858
National Ranking
8910

Geoffrey D. Rubin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey D. Rubin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 304 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Geoffrey D. Rubin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey D. Rubin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoffrey D. Rubin is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on radiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, biomedical engineering, artificial intelligence, and oncology. Their research encompasses a broad spectrum of topics related to medical imaging and diagnostics.

The scientist's recent publications include important works such as:

  • The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, CHEST Journal
  • The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society, 2020, Radiology
  • CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System, 2022, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • COVID-19 Imaging: What We Know Now and What Remains Unknown, 2021, Radiology
  • Chest CT Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Drug-Related Pneumonitis in Patients Receiving Molecular Targeting Agents and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, 2021, CHEST Journal

Their main fields of study are concentrated in Medicine, with a significant number of publications in radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, biomedical engineering, artificial intelligence, and oncology. This multidisciplinary approach reflects in the diversity of research topics addressed.

Primary research topics related to their work include:

  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Frequent collaborators in their research network include Joseph Y. Lo, Fakrul Islam Tushar, Vincent M. D'Anniballe, Maciej A. Mazurowski, and Christopher J. Ryerson. These coauthors have jointly contributed to multiple studies.

The scientist's body of work is published in several reputable venues, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their research. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Radiology
  • CHEST Journal
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017

    Heber MacMahon;David P. Naidich;Jin Mo Goo;Kyung Soo Lee

  • Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography : A scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention, council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and committee on cardiac imaging, council on clinical cardiology

    Matthew J. Budoff;Stephan Achenbach;Roger S. Blumenthal;J. Jeffrey Carr

  • ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging*

    Robert C. Hendel;Manesh R. Patel;Christopher M. Kramer;Michael Poon

  • The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society

    Geoffrey D. Rubin;Christopher J. Ryerson;Linda B. Haramati;Nicola Sverzellati

  • Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: Summary of opinions expressed at an international conference

    Frank J. Veith;Richard A. Baum;Richard A. Baum;Takao Ohki;Takao Ohki;Max Amor;Max Amor

  • ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the society of cardiovascular computed tomography, the American college of radiology, the American heart association, the American society of echocardiography

    Allen J. Taylor;Manuel Cerqueira;John McB Hodgson;Daniel Mark

  • Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging.

    G D Rubin;C F Beaulieu;V Argiro;H Ringl

  • CAD-RADS™: Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology

    Ricardo C. Cury;Suhny Abbara;Stephan Achenbach;Arthur Agatston

  • Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience.

    G D Rubin;M D Dake;S A Napel;C H McDonnell

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    Daniel B. Mark;Daniel S. Berman;Matthew J. Budoff

  • CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection.

    S Napel;M P Marks;G D Rubin;M D Dake

  • Multi–Detector Row CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Arterial Inflow and Runoff: Initial Experience

    Geoffrey D. Rubin;Andrew J. Schmidt;Laura J. Logan;Mark C. Sofilos

  • Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques.

    G D Rubin;M D Dake;S Napel;R B Jeffrey

  • Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography.

    Geoffrey D. Rubin;Maria C. Shiau;Ann N. Leung;Stephen T. Kee

  • Surface normal overlap: a computer-aided detection algorithm with application to colonic polyps and lung nodules in helical CT

    D.S. Paik;C.F. Beaulieu;G.D. Rubin;B. Acar

  • Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection.

    Geoffrey D Rubin;John K Lyo;David S Paik;Anthony J Sherbondy

  • Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography.

    Dominik Fleischmann;Geoffrey D. Rubin;Alexander A. Bankier;Karl Hittmair

  • Recommendations for Measuring Pulmonary Nodules at CT: A Statement from the Fleischner Society.

    Alexander A. Bankier;Heber MacMahon;Jin Mo Goo;Geoffrey D. Rubin

  • Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT

    Geoffrey D Rubin

  • ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography

    Allen J. Taylor;Manuel Cerqueira;John Mc B. Hodgson;Daniel Mark

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandy Napel
Sandy Napel Stanford University
R B Jeffrey
R B Jeffrey Stanford University
Christopher K. Zarins
Christopher K. Zarins Stanford University
Michael D. Dake
Michael D. Dake University of Arizona
Joseph Y. Lo
Joseph Y. Lo Duke University
Alan S. Go
Alan S. Go Kaiser Permanente
Mark A. Hlatky
Mark A. Hlatky Stanford University
Carlos Iribarren
Carlos Iribarren Kaiser Permanente
Maciej A. Mazurowski
Maciej A. Mazurowski Duke University
Ehsan Samei
Ehsan Samei Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens many doors, including diverse online degree options and flexible career pathways. If you're interested in supporting healthcare without direct patient care, consider enrolling in medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. These programs cater to students seeking adaptable schedules and financial support while preparing for in-demand administrative roles.

Those drawn to nursing can find accessible options through nursing programs without teas. These programs eliminate common entrance exam barriers, making it easier for aspiring nurses to begin their training online or on campus.

If you are interested in leadership, a healthcare administration accelerated degree can quickly prepare you for management roles in hospitals or clinics. For registered nurses aiming to advance, adn to fnp bridge programs offer a fast track to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, combining flexibility and advanced clinical training.

Each of these pathways enables students to build a rewarding healthcare career, benefiting from online convenience and targeted, practical curricula.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey D. Rubin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles