World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
31744
World Ranking
9731
National Ranking
5008

R B Jeffrey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R B Jeffrey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 438 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

R B Jeffrey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R B Jeffrey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

R B Jeffrey is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has a research focus in the field of Medicine, with 28 publications contributing to this area. Their work spans several subfields including Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's research topics encompass a range of areas related to diagnostic and treatment methods, specifically:

  • Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Abdominal Trauma and Injuries

R B Jeffrey has published extensively in venues such as Abdominal Radiology, with six papers published there, along with contributions to the Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Ultrasound Quarterly, and the Journal of Medical Imaging.

Key publications by R B Jeffrey include:

  • Cystic artery velocity as a predictor of acute cholecystitis, 2021, Abdominal Radiology
  • Cost-effectiveness of dual-energy CT versus multiphasic single-energy CT and MRI for characterization of incidental indeterminate renal lesions, 2020, Abdominal Radiology
  • Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions using CT-based radiomics and machine learning: comparison with radiologist interpretation, 2022, Abdominal Radiology
  • Evaluation of early sonographic predictors of gangrenous cholecystitis: mucosal discontinuity and echogenic pericholecystic fat, 2022, Abdominal Radiology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers including Bhavik N. Patel, Aya Kamaya, Domenico Mastrodicasa, Eric W. Olcott, and Justin R. Tse, reflecting a network of co-authors contributing multiple papers together.

Best Publications

  • Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement

    Mary C. Frates;Carol B. Benson;J. William Charboneau;Edmund S. Cibas

  • Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging.

    G D Rubin;C F Beaulieu;V Argiro;H Ringl

  • Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience.

    G D Rubin;M D Dake;S A Napel;C H McDonnell

  • CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection.

    S Napel;M P Marks;G D Rubin;M D Dake

  • Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases.

    R B Jeffrey;F C Laing;R R Townsend

  • Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques.

    G D Rubin;M D Dake;S Napel;R B Jeffrey

  • Common and uncommon sonographic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

    Bryan K. Chan;Terry S. Desser;I. Ross McDougall;Ronald J. Weigel

  • Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients.

    M. J. Lane;D. M. Liu;M. D. Huynh;R. B. Jeffrey

  • Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Thyroid Masses

    Charles Carmeci;R. Brooke Jeffrey;Iain Ross McDOUGALL;Kent W. Nowels

  • Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs.

    Rupert W Prokesch;Lawrence C Chow;Christopher F Beaulieu;Roland Bammer

  • Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (< or = 1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms.

    M D Hollett;R B Jeffrey;M Nino-Murcia;M J Jorgensen

  • Surface normal overlap: a computer-aided detection algorithm with application to colonic polyps and lung nodules in helical CT

    D.S. Paik;C.F. Beaulieu;G.D. Rubin;B. Acar

  • MDCT in Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations.

    Rafael Vargas;Matilde Nino-Murcia;Ward Trueblood;R. Brooke Jeffrey

  • Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis.

    M J Lane;D S Katz;B A Ross;T L Clautice-Engle

  • Evaluation of abdominal trauma by computed tomography.

    M P Federle;H I Goldberg;J A Kaiser;A A Moss

  • Prostatic carcinoma: staging by clinical assessment, CT, and MR imaging.

    H Hricak;G C Dooms;R B Jeffrey;A Avallone

  • Hemoperitoneum studied by computed tomography.

    M P Federle;R B Jeffrey

  • Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study.

    Summers Rm;Beaulieu Cf;Pusanik Lm;Malley Jd

  • Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.

    Sandra E. Bendeck;Matilde Nino-Murcia;Gerald J. Berry;R. Brooke Jeffrey

  • Computed tomographic angiography: historical perspective and new state-of the-art using multi detector-row helical computed tomography

    G D Rubin;M C Shiau;A J Schmidt;D Fleischmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael P. Federle
Michael P. Federle Stanford University
Geoffrey D. Rubin
Geoffrey D. Rubin University of Arizona
Sandy Napel
Sandy Napel Stanford University
Michael D. Dake
Michael D. Dake University of Arizona
David A. Nyberg
David A. Nyberg University of Washington
Robert J. Herfkens
Robert J. Herfkens Stanford University
Jack W. McAninch
Jack W. McAninch University of California, San Francisco
Norbert J. Pelc
Norbert J. Pelc Stanford University
Hedvig Hricak
Hedvig Hricak Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Donald I. Abrams
Donald I. Abrams University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in Medicine but want alternative or complementary pathways, online nursing degrees offer excellent opportunities. There is a growing demand for skilled nursing professionals across the USA, making nursing an appealing option for those interested in healthcare.

Many students are concerned about the cost of education. Fortunately, there are affordable nursing programs online that make it easier to get started in this field. For registered nurses looking to advance their careers, finding the rn to bsn cheapest options can help them obtain higher qualifications without breaking the bank.

For those seeking advanced practice roles, choosing the cheapest online fnp program (Family Nurse Practitioner) can make graduate education more accessible. If you are interested in research or leadership positions, pursuing a phd in nursing online can open doors to academic, policy, or executive careers in healthcare.

Exploring these online degree options can help you tailor your medical education journey while keeping your long-term career goals in mind.

Best Scientists Citing R B Jeffrey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles