World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 40 3885 3636 63 56 105 6819

Edo Chalutz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edo Chalutz between 1969 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edo Chalutz published across 50 years, from 1969 to 2018, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1985. 1 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1985. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication
1969 2018

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edo Chalutz: publications per year, 1969 to 2018
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 1
1972 2
1973 3
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 3
1978 2
1979 6
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 4
1984 5
1985 7
1986 1
1987 1
1988 5
1989 3
1990 7
1991 6
1992 4
1993 7
1994 6
1995 4
1996 5
1997 5
1998 4
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
Total 107
Download as CSV

Edo Chalutz publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edo Chalutz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–105 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 105 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227 105
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Edo Chalutz D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edo Chalutz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232 40
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Enzyme
  • Botany
  • Fungus

Edo Chalutz mainly focuses on Botany, Botrytis cinerea, Postharvest, Fungi imperfecti and Penicillium expansum. His work deals with themes such as Ripening, Lycopersicon and Alternaria alternata, which intersect with Botrytis cinerea. Postharvest is a subfield of Horticulture that he explores.

As part of one scientific family, Edo Chalutz deals mainly with the area of Horticulture, narrowing it down to issues related to the Moho, and often Fruits and vegetables and Legume. Edo Chalutz interconnects Pichia guilliermondii, Penicillium digitatum and Debaryomyces hansenii in the investigation of issues within Fungi imperfecti. His work carried out in the field of Penicillium expansum brings together such families of science as [Candida] oleophila, Botrytis and Microbiology.

His most cited work include:

  • Mode of action of the postharvest biocontrol yeast, Pichia guilliermondii. I. Characterization of attachment to Botrytis cinerea (225 citations)
  • Characterization of the biocontrol activity of Debaryomyces hansenii in the control of Penicillium digitatum on grapefruit (206 citations)
  • Potential of induced resistance to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables (189 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Edo Chalutz focuses on Horticulture, Botany, Postharvest, Penicillium digitatum and Biochemistry. His Horticulture research incorporates themes from Fruits and vegetables and Agronomy. In general Botany, his work in Rutaceae, Fungi imperfecti and Ripening is often linked to Ultraviolet light linking many areas of study.

His research integrates issues of Botrytis cinerea, Biotechnology, Biological pest control and Yeast in his study of Postharvest. His Penicillium digitatum research includes elements of Penicillium italicum, Monilinia fructicola, Fungus and Methionine. His study looks at the intersection of Fungus and topics like Microbiology with Penicillium expansum.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Horticulture (46.77%)
  • Botany (41.94%)
  • Postharvest (33.87%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1994-2011)?

  • Horticulture (46.77%)
  • Postharvest (33.87%)
  • Botany (41.94%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Edo Chalutz mainly investigates Horticulture, Postharvest, Botany, Penicillium digitatum and Yeast. His work in the fields of Horticulture, such as Fusarium, Seed treatment and Citrus fruit, intersects with other areas such as Hormesis. His studies in Postharvest integrate themes in fields like Biotechnology and Biological pest control.

His work on Germ tube and Ripening as part of general Botany study is frequently connected to Ultraviolet light, Lesion and Rhizopus soft rot, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. As a part of the same scientific study, Edo Chalutz usually deals with the Penicillium digitatum, concentrating on Monilinia fructicola and frequently concerns with Debaryomyces hansenii and Pome. His work on Pichia guilliermondii as part of general Yeast research is frequently linked to Agricultural commodity, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.

Between 1994 and 2011, his most popular works were:

  • Commercial Testing of Aspire: A Yeast Preparation for the Biological Control of Postharvest Decay of Citrus (189 citations)
  • Effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum in vitro and on the biocontrol activity of Candida oleophila (137 citations)
  • Influence of CaCl2 on Penicillium digitatum, Grapefruit Peel Tissue, and Biocontrol Activity of Pichia guilliermondii (117 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Enzyme
  • Botany
  • Fungus

Edo Chalutz mostly deals with Postharvest, Penicillium digitatum, Spore germination, Microbiology and Monilinia fructicola. His Postharvest research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Fungicide and Metalaxyl. His Penicillium digitatum study is concerned with the field of Botany as a whole.

The various areas that Edo Chalutz examines in his Spore germination study include Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea, [Candida] oleophila. His Microbiology study incorporates themes from Ripening, Inoculation, Debaryomyces hansenii and Fungus. His Horticulture study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biotechnology and Penicillium.

Best Publications

  • Mode of action of the postharvest biocontrol yeast, Pichia guilliermondii. I. Characterization of attachment to Botrytis cinerea

    Michael Wisniewski;Charles Biles;Samir Droby;Randy McLaughlin

  • Potential of induced resistance to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables

    C.L. Wilson;A. El Ghaouth;E. Chalutz;S. Droby

  • Characterization of the biocontrol activity of Debaryomyces hansenii in the control of Penicillium digitatum on grapefruit

    S. Droby;E. Chalutz;C. L. Wilson;M. Wisniewski

  • Commercial Testing of Aspire: A Yeast Preparation for the Biological Control of Postharvest Decay of Citrus

    S Droby;L Cohen;A Daus;B Weiss

  • A selection strategy for microbial antagonists to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables

    Charles L. Wilson;Michael E. Wisniewski;Samir Droby;Edo Chalutz

  • Effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum in vitro and on the biocontrol activity of Candida oleophila

    M. Wisniewski;S. Droby;E. Chalutz;Y. Eilam

  • Biological control of post-harvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: alternatives to synthetic fungicides

    Charles L. Wilson;Michael E. Wisniewski;Charles L. Biles;Randy McLaughlin

  • Application of Ultraviolet-C Light on Storage Rots and Ripening of Tomatoes.

    J. Liu;C. Stevens;V. A. Khan;J. Y. Lu

  • Postharvest biological control of Penicillium rots of citrus with antagonistic yeasts and bacteria

    Charles L. Wilson;Edo Chalutz

  • Influence of CaCl2 on Penicillium digitatum, Grapefruit Peel Tissue, and Biocontrol Activity of Pichia guilliermondii

    S. Droby;M. E. Wisniewski;L. Cohen;B. Weiss

  • Effect of inoculum concentration and salt solutions on biological control of postharvest diseases of apple with Candida sp.

    R. J. McLaughlin;M. E. Wisniewski;C. L. Wilson;E. Chalutz

  • Postharvest biocontrol of green and blue mold and sour rot of citrus fruit by Debaryomyces hansenii.

    Unknown

  • The germicidal and hormetic effects of UV-C light on reducing brown rot disease and yeast microflora of peaches

    C. Stevens;V.A. Khan;J.Y. Lu;C.L. Wilson

  • Factors affecting UV-induced resistance in grapefruit against the green mould decay caused by Penicillium digitatum

    S. Droby;E. Chalutz;B. Horev;L. Cohen

  • Plant hormesis induced by ultraviolet light-C for controlling postharvest diseases of tree fruits

    C. Stevens;C.L. Wilson;J.Y. Lu;V.A. Khan

  • Biological control of postharvest diseases of grape, peach, and apple with the yeasts Kloeckera apiculata and Candida guilliermondii

    R. J. Mclaughlin;C. L. Wilson;S. Droby;E. Chalutz

  • Integration of Ultraviolet (UV-C) Light with Yeast Treatment for Control of Postharvest Storage Rots of Fruits and Vegetables☆

    C. Stevens;V.A. Khan;J.Y. Lu;C.L. Wilson

  • Pilot Testing of Pichia guilliermondii: A Biocontrol Agent of Postharvest Diseases of Citrus Fruit

    S. Droby;R. Hofstein;C.L. Wilson;M. Wisniewski

  • The effects of low-dose ultraviolet light-C treatment on polygalacturonase activity, delay ripening and Rhizopus soft rot development of tomatoes

    C. Stevens;J. Liu;V.A. Khan;J.Y. Lu

  • Postharvest biocontrol: new concepts and applications

    M. Wisniewski;C. Wilson;S. Droby;E. Chalutz

  • Biological control of postharvest diseases: a promising alternative to the use of synthetic fungicides

    S. Droby;E. Chalutz;C. L. Wilson;M. E. Wisniewski

Frequent Co-Authors

Samir Droby
Samir Droby Agricultural Research Organization
Charles L. Wilson
Charles L. Wilson Agricultural Research Service
Michael Wisniewski
Michael Wisniewski Virginia Tech
Autar K. Mattoo
Autar K. Mattoo United States Department of Agriculture
Isaac Barash
Isaac Barash Tel Aviv University
Ilan Chet
Ilan Chet Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jaacov Katan
Jaacov Katan Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Dov Prusky
Dov Prusky Agricultural Research Organization
Leah Tsror
Leah Tsror Agricultural Research Organization
Yigal Cohen
Yigal Cohen Bar-Ilan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Edo Chalutz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles