World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
25406
World Ranking
17036
National Ranking
8545

Diane C. Arthur publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane C. Arthur sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 194 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Diane C. Arthur D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane C. Arthur sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diane C. Arthur is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their professional background situates them within a prominent biomedical research institution known for advancing health-related scientific knowledge.

While no specific publications, co-authors, or frequent venues of publication have been recorded, their ongoing association with such a significant federal research body suggests involvement in scientific projects and studies oriented toward public health and biomedical research.

There are no recorded fields or subfields of study, and no identified main topics of research available for this scientist. Additionally, there is no detailed information on book publications or awards connected to their profile.

This profile is based exclusively on institutional affiliation and does not include personal accolades, recent papers, or collaborations, as those data points are not present.

Best Publications

  • Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461)

    John C. Byrd;Krzysztof Mrózek;Richard K. Dodge;Andrew J. Carroll

  • Uniform approach to risk classification and treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    M Smith;D Arthur;B Camitta;A J Carroll

  • ZAP-70 expression identifies a chronic lymphocytic leukemia subtype with unmutated immunoglobulin genes, inferior clinical outcome, and distinct gene expression profile

    Adrian Wiestner;Andreas Rosenwald;Todd S. Barry;George Wright

  • The lymph node microenvironment promotes B-cell receptor signaling, NF-κB activation, and tumor proliferation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    Yair Herishanu;Patricia Pérez-Galán;Delong Liu;Angélique Biancotto

  • Frequency of Prolonged Remission Duration after High-Dose Cytarabine Intensification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Varies by Cytogenetic Subtype

    Clara D. Bloomfield;David Lawrence;John C. Byrd;Andrew Carroll

  • GATA2 deficiency: a protean disorder of hematopoiesis, lymphatics and immunity

    Michael A. Spinner;Lauren A. Sanchez;Amy P. Hsu;Pamela A. Shaw

  • Epstein-Barr virus associated B cell lymphoproliferative disorders following bone marrow transplantation.

    RS Shapiro;K McClain;G Frizzera;KJ Gajl-Peczalska

  • Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) induced polyclonal and monoclonal B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases occurring after renal transplantation. Clinical, pathologic, and virologic findings and implications for therapy.

    Douglas W. Hanto;Kazimiera J. Gajl-peczalska;Glauco Frizzera;Diane C. Arthur

  • A comparison of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and aggressive chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia in remission: a report from the Children's Cancer Group

    William G. Woods;Steven Neudorf;Stuart Gold;Jean Sanders

  • Nonrandom Chromosome Abnormalities in Lymphoma

    Clara D. Bloomfield;Diane C. Arthur;Glauco Frizzera;Ellis G. Levine

  • Ibrutinib for previously untreated and relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with TP53 aberrations: a phase 2, single-arm trial.

    Mohammed Z H Farooqui;Janet Valdez;Sabrina Martyr;Georg Aue

  • Human acute leukemia cell line with the t(4;11) chromosomal rearrangement exhibits B lineage and monocytic characteristics.

    Robin C. Stong;Stanley J. Korsmeyer;Janet L. Parkin;Diane C. Arthur

  • Timed-sequential induction therapy improves postremission outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group

    William G. Woods;Nathan Kobrinsky;Jonathan D. Buckley;Jae Won Lee

  • Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a clinical and morphologic study of 65 cases.

    Sheryl D. Michels;Robert W. McKenna;Diane C. Arthur;Richard D. Brunning

  • Distinctive Demography, Biology, and Outcome of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Children With Down Syndrome: Children's Cancer Group Studies 2861 and 2891

    Beverly J. Lange;Nathan Kobrinsky;Dorothy R. Barnard;Diane C. Arthur

  • Diagnostic utility of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in myelodysplastic syndrome

    Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson;Diane C. Arthur;Nicholas Jabbour;Xiu Y. Xie

  • Secondary leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome after treatment with epipodophyllotoxins.

    Malcolm A. Smith;Lawrence Rubinstein;James R. Anderson;Diane Arthur

  • Myelodysplastic syndrome after autologous bone marrow transplantation: an additional late complication of curative cancer therapy.

    Jeffrey S. Miller;Diane C. Arthur;Craig E. Litz;Joseph P. Neglia

  • Clonal evolution leading to ibrutinib resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Inhye E. Ahn;Chingiz Underbayev;Adam Albitar;Sarah E. M. Herman

  • Partial Deletion of the Long Arm of Chromosome 16 and Bone Marrow Eosinophilia in Acute Nonlymphocytic Leukemia: A New Association

    Diane C. Arthur;Clara D. Bloomfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Clara D. Bloomfield
Clara D. Bloomfield The Ohio State University
Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson
Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson National Institutes of Health
Richard D. Brunning
Richard D. Brunning University of Minnesota
William G. Woods
William G. Woods Emory University
Gerald E. Marti
Gerald E. Marti National Institutes of Health
Kazimiera J. Gajl-Peczalska
Kazimiera J. Gajl-Peczalska University of Minnesota
John H. Kersey
John H. Kersey University of Minnesota
Harland N. Sather
Harland N. Sather University of Southern California
Ola Landgren
Ola Landgren University of Miami
Seth M. Steinberg
Seth M. Steinberg National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean pursuing a traditional MD. Many students look for flexible, affordable online options to start or advance their medical careers. Several healthcare fields now offer reputable online degree and certification paths.

For those interested in pharmacy, online pharmd programs provide a convenient way to earn a doctorate while balancing work and personal life. Health information management is another fast-growing field; accredited healthcare informatics degree programs prepare students for roles in digital records, analytics, and compliance.

If you prefer a shorter or more specialized program, consider finding the cheapest medical coding certification online to enter the important billing and coding sector. Nursing is in high demand too, and pursuing the cheapest np programs online can lead to advanced clinical roles without relocating or pausing your career.

Each of these online pathways offers unique opportunities to build skills, gain credentials, and make a difference in the evolving world of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Diane C. Arthur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles