World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
26998
World Ranking
11001
National Ranking
5660

Harland N. Sather publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harland N. Sather sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 230 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Harland N. Sather D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harland N. Sather sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Harland N. Sather is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. The academic profile available for this researcher shows a career grounded primarily in this institution.

While specific details about publications, research topics, and coauthors are not outlined in the available data, their contributions are situated within the broader scope of their primary affiliation, suggesting involvement in the academic community at USC.

The absence of listed recent papers, frequent coauthors, publication venues, or book publications indicates that further information might be necessary to fully map the extent of this scientist's research output and collaborations.

There are no awards recorded for Harland N. Sather in the provided data, nor is there detailed evidence regarding fields or subfields of study and main topics, which limits the profiling to focusing primarily on institutional association.

Harland N. Sather is noted as living, therefore their work and academic contributions may continue to develop. The objective presentation of this profile reflects the currently available public scholarly record without extrapolating beyond the data provided.

Best Publications

  • Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas.

    Robert C. Seeger;Garrett M. Brodeur;Harland Sather;Andree Dalton

  • Uniform approach to risk classification and treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    M Smith;D Arthur;B Camitta;A J Carroll

  • Improved Early Event-Free Survival With Imatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Children's Oncology Group Study

    Kirk R. Schultz;W. Paul Bowman;Alexander Aledo;William B. Slayton

  • Second neoplasms after acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood.

    Neglia Jp;Meadows At;Robison Ll;Kim Th

  • A randomized comparison of native Escherichia coli asparaginase and polyethylene glycol conjugated asparaginase for treatment of children with newly diagnosed standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a children's Cancer Group Study

    Vassilios I. Avramis;Susan Sencer;Antonia P. Periclou;Harland Sather

  • Risk- and response-based classification of childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a combined analysis of prognostic markers from the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Children's Cancer Group (CCG)

    Kirk R. Schultz;D. Jeanette Pullen;Harland N. Sather;Jonathan J. Shuster

  • Augmented post-induction therapy for children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and a slow response to initial therapy.

    James B. Nachman;Harland N. Sather;Martha G. Sensel;Michael E. Trigg

  • Osteonecrosis as a Complication of Treating Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children: A Report From the Children’s Cancer Group

    Leonard A. Mattano;Harland N. Sather;Michael E. Trigg;James B. Nachman

  • Dexamethasone versus prednisone and daily oral versus weekly intravenous mercaptopurine for patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

    Bruce C. Bostrom;Martha R. Sensel;Harland N. Sather;Paul S. Gaynon

  • Early postinduction intensification therapy improves survival for children and adolescents with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

    Nita L. Seibel;Peter G. Steinherz;Harland N. Sather;James B. Nachman

  • Long Term Results of the Children’s Cancer Group Studies for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 1983–2002: a Children’s Oncology Group Report

    Paul S. Gaynon;Paul S. Gaynon;Anne L. Angiolillo;William L. Carroll;James B. Nachman

  • Analysis of prognostic factors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants: report on CCG 1953 from the Children's Oncology Group.

    Joanne M. Hilden;Patricia A. Dinndorf;Sharon O. Meerbaum;Harland Sather

  • Outcome of treatment in children with hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    James B. Nachman;Nyla A. Heerema;Harland Sather;Bruce Camitta

  • Racial and ethnic differences in survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Smita Bhatia;Harland N. Sather;Nyla A. Heerema;Michael E. Trigg

  • Asparaginase antibody and asparaginase activity in children with higher-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Cancer Group Study CCG-1961.

    Eduard H Panosyan;Nita L Seibel;Sagrario Martin-Aragon;Paul S Gaynon

  • Clinical heterogeneity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with 11q23 rearrangements.

    CH Pui;JM Chessells;B Camitta;A Baruchel

  • Early Response to Therapy and Outcome in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia A Review

    Paul S. Gaynon;Anish A. Desai;Bruce C. Bostrom;Raymond J. Hutchinson

  • Prognostic Value of Immunocytologic Detection of Bone Marrow Metastases in Neuroblastoma

    T J Moss;C P Reynolds;H N Sather;S G Romansky

  • Down syndrome and acute leukemia in children: a 10-year retrospective survey from Childrens Cancer Study Group.

    Leslie L. Robison;Mark E. Nesbit;Harland N. Sather;Carolyn Level

  • Assessment of the interrelationship of prognostic factors in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from Childrens Cancer Study Group

    Leslie L. Robison;Harland N. Sather;Peter F. Coccia;Mark E. Nesbit

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul S. Gaynon
Paul S. Gaynon University of Southern California
Nyla A. Heerema
Nyla A. Heerema The Ohio State University
Fatih M. Uckun
Fatih M. Uckun University of Southern California
Stephen P. Hunger
Stephen P. Hunger University of Pennsylvania
Meenakshi Devidas
Meenakshi Devidas St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Mark E. Nesbit
Mark E. Nesbit University of Minnesota
Beverly J. Lange
Beverly J. Lange Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
William L. Carroll
William L. Carroll New York University
Diane C. Arthur
Diane C. Arthur National Institutes of Health
Leslie L. Robison
Leslie L. Robison St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative routes in healthcare education can open up new opportunities for those interested in medical careers in the USA. Many students seek degree options that offer greater flexibility, faster completion times, and fewer in-person requirements.

For registered nurses, rn to bsn no clinical hours programs provide a convenient way to advance qualifications online without needing to complete additional on-site clinical work. If you're looking to advance further, shortest dnp programs online offer rigorous training at a quicker pace, helping professionals earn their Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently.

Some nursing professionals may prioritize minimal clinical requirements. Options like a dnp program without clinical hours can streamline the process and reduce the logistical challenges of traditional graduate education. Meanwhile, those starting their journey in healthcare may consider an accelerated lpn pathway, which compresses essential coursework and hands-on training for faster workforce entry.

Each of these diverse online options can help students achieve their educational and career goals—all with greater adaptability and speed.

Best Scientists Citing Harland N. Sather

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles