World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
22622
World Ranking
15724
National Ranking
7914

Mark E. Nesbit publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Nesbit sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 275 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark E. Nesbit D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Nesbit sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Nesbit is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their academic profile includes research activities, although no specific recent papers or publications have been listed.

No information is available regarding frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields and subfields of study. Likewise, no notable topics of work or academic awards have been recorded in the provided data.

Due to the limited data on their research output, it is not possible to detail specific contributions, research themes, or collaborations at this time. The profile reflects only the confirmed affiliation and name details without further bibliographic or scholarly context.

Best Publications

  • Virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome: a benign histiocytic proliferation distinct from malignant histiocytosis.

    Robert J. Risdall;Robert W. McKenna;Mark E. Nesbit;William Krivit

  • Late mortality experience in five-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

    Ann C. Mertens;Yutaka Yasui;Joseph P. Neglia;John D. Potter

  • Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project.

    Leslie L. Robison;Ann C. Mertens;John D. Boice;Norman E. Breslow

  • Multimodal therapy for the management of primary, nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone: a long-term follow-up of the First Intergroup study.

    M E Nesbit;E A Gehan;E O Burgert;T J Vietti

  • Second malignant neoplasms in children: an update from the Late Effects Study Group.

    A T Meadows;E Baum;F Fossati-Bellani;D Green

  • HISTTOCYTOSIS SYNDROMES IN CHILDREN

    Tony Chu;G.J. D'Angio;S. Ladisch;M. Nesbit

  • Successful Bone-Marrow Transplantation for Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis

    Peter F. Coccia;William Krivit;Jaroslav Cervenka;Carlyle Clawson

  • Comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for treatment of high-risk refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    John H. Kersey;Daniel Weisdorf;Mark E. Nesbit;Tucker W. LeBien

  • A Randomized Study of the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

    Norma K. C. Ramsay;John H. Kersey;Leslie L. Robison;Philip B. McGlave

  • Occupational exposures of parents of children with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: a report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group.

    Buckley Jd;Robison Ll;Swotinsky R;Garabrant Dh

  • Changes in body mass index and prevalence of overweight in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: role of cranial irradiation.

    Charles A. Sklar;Ann C. Mertens;Andrew Walter;Deanna Mitchell

  • Down syndrome and acute leukemia in children: a 10-year retrospective survey from Childrens Cancer Study Group.

    Leslie L. Robison;Mark E. Nesbit;Harland N. Sather;Carolyn Level

  • Assessment of the interrelationship of prognostic factors in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from Childrens Cancer Study Group

    Leslie L. Robison;Harland N. Sather;Peter F. Coccia;Mark E. Nesbit

  • Acute and chronic effects of methotrexate on hepatic, pulmonary, and skeletal systems.

    Mark Nesbit;William Krivit;Ruth Heyn;Harvey Sharp

  • l-Asparaginase, Vincristine, and Prednisone for Induction of First Remission in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Jorge A. Ortega;Mark E. Nesbit;Milton H. Donaldson;Robert E. Hittle

  • Overwhelming sepsis following splenectomy for trauma

    John R. Balfanz;Mark E. Nesbit;C. Jarvis;William Krivit

  • Final height after treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Comparison of no cranial irradiation with 1800 and 2400 centigrays of cranial irradiation

    Charles Sklar;Ann Mertens;Andrew Walter;Deanna Mitchell

  • Autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second or subsequent remission: results of bone marrow treated with monoclonal antibodies BA-1, BA-2, and BA-3 plus complement.

    Norma Ramsay;Tucker LeBien;Mark Nesbit;Philip McGlave

  • Translocation 4; 11 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: clinical characteristics and prognostic significance

    Diane C. Arthur;Clara D. Bloomfield;Leanna L. Lindquist;Mark E. Nesbit

  • Hyperphosphatemia, hyperphosphaturia and hypocalcemia in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Jaime Zusman;David M. Brown;Mark E. Nesbit

Frequent Co-Authors

John H. Kersey
John H. Kersey University of Minnesota
William Krivit
William Krivit University of Minnesota
Norma K.C. Ramsay
Norma K.C. Ramsay University of Minnesota
William G. Woods
William G. Woods Emory University
Leslie L. Robison
Leslie L. Robison St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Harland N. Sather
Harland N. Sather University of Southern California
Tucker W. LeBien
Tucker W. LeBien University of Minnesota
Jonathan D. Buckley
Jonathan D. Buckley University of South Australia
Richard D. Brunning
Richard D. Brunning University of Minnesota
Clara D. Bloomfield
Clara D. Bloomfield The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring alternatives or pathways related to studying Medicine in the USA, several online degree options and career routes are available. Accelerated nursing programs can fast-track your entry into healthcare. For example, online direct entry MSN programs for non-nursing majors allow those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree to pursue a master’s in nursing and launch a healthcare career quickly.

Admission criteria vary widely. Some direct admit nursing programs have more flexible requirements, making them accessible for applicants of diverse backgrounds. Additionally, there are nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams, simplifying the admissions process for many students.

If you’re interested in healthcare but not clinical practice, careers like medical billing and coding can be pursued entirely online. There are accredited programs offering financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, making this pathway both affordable and flexible. These options broaden your choices for entering the healthcare sector, regardless of your previous education or life situation.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Nesbit

Trending Scientists