World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Cody Bünger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cody Bünger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Cody Bünger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cody Bünger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cody Bünger is affiliated with Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of engineering and medicine. Their work primarily focuses on biomedical engineering and surgery with a notable emphasis on materials chemistry, biomaterials, and automotive engineering.

Their research addresses several main topics, including bone tissue engineering materials, graphene and nanomaterials applications, scoliosis diagnosis and treatment, graphene research and applications, additive manufacturing and 3D printing technologies, spine and intervertebral disc pathology, and biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties.

Among recent publications, several papers demonstrate their involvement in specialized materials research as well as clinical topics related to spinal health:

  • Enhanced fracture toughness of three dimensional graphene-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites by employing the Taguchi method, 2020, Composites Part B Engineering
  • Improving the mechanical behavior of reduced graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites using gas injection into powders synthesis autoclave, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Nucleation and growth of brushite crystals on the graphene sheets applicable in bone cement, 2020, Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio
  • How good are the outcomes of instrumented debulking operations for symptomatic spinal metastases and how long do they stand? A subgroup analysis in the global spine tumor study group database, 2020, Acta Neurochirurgica
  • Feeder-free generation and transcriptome characterization of functional mesenchymal stromal cells from human pluripotent stem cells, 2020, Stem Cell Research

Their frequent coauthors provide insight into collaborative relationships, including:

  • Hassan Nosrati
  • Dang Quang Svend Le
  • Rasoul Sarraf-Mamoory
  • María Canillas Pérez
  • Reza Zolfaghari Emameh

Publication venues highlight the interdisciplinary nature of their work and include:

  • Spine Deformity
  • Clinical Rehabilitation
  • Composites Part B Engineering
  • Scientific Reports
  • Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio

Best Publications

  • Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants

    K Soballe;ES Hansen;H Brockstedt-Rasmussen;C Bunger

  • 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.

    Karsten Thomsen;Finn B. Christensen;Søren P. Eiskjær;Ebbe S. Hansen

  • Mesenchymal stem cell ingrowth and differentiation on coralline hydroxyapatite scaffolds.

    Tina Mygind;Maik Stiehler;Anette Baatrup;Haisheng Li

  • Does spinal surgery improve the quality of life for those with extradural (spinal) osseous metastases? An international multicenter prospective observational study of 223 patients. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2007.

    Ahmed Ibrahim;Alan Crockard;Pierre Antonietti;Stefano Boriani

  • Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group

    David Choi;A. Crockard;C. Bunger;J. Harms

  • Transforming growth factor-β enhances fracture healing in rabbit tibiae

    Martin Lind;Bente Schumacker;Kjeld Søballe;Johnny Keller

  • Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spinal fusion.

    Thomas Andersen;Finn B. Christensen;Malene Laursen;Kristian Høy

  • Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants. A comparison in dogs between press fit and noninterference fit.

    Kjeld Søballe;Ebbe Stender Hansen;Helle Brockstedt-Rasmussen;Claus Møger Pedersen

  • Circumferential Lumbar Spinal Fusion With Brantigan Cage Versus Posterolateral Fusion With Titanium Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation : A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study of 146 Patients

    Finn B Christensen;Ebbe S Hansen;Søren P Eiskjaer;Kristian Høy

  • Hydroxyapatite coating modifies implant membrane formation. Controlled micromotion studied in dogs.

    Kjeld Søballe;Helle Brockstedt-Rasmussen;Ebbe Stender Hansen;Cody Bünger

  • Migration of hydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses. A Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric study

    K Soballe;S Toksvig-Larsen;J Gelineck;S Fruensgaard

  • Effect of dynamic 3-D culture on proliferation, distribution, and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells.

    Maik Stiehler;Cody Bünger;Anette Baatrup;Anette Baatrup;Martin Lind;Martin Lind

  • Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up.

    Finn Bjarke Christensen;Ebbe Stender Hansen;Malene Laursen;Karsten Thomsen

  • Observation of Time-Reversal Violation in the B-0 Meson System

    J. P. Lees;V. Poireau;V. Tisserand;J. Garra Tico

  • Bone morphogenetic protein-2 but not bone morphogenetic protein-4 and -6 stimulates chemotactic migration of human osteoblasts, human marrow osteoblasts, and U2-OS cells

    M. Lind;E.F. Eriksen;C. Bünger

  • Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Tina S Videbaek;Finn B Christensen;Rikke Soegaard;Ebbe S Hansen

  • Titanium-alloy enhances bone-pedicle screw fixation: mechanical and histomorphometrical results of titanium-alloy versus stainless steel

    F. B. Christensen;M. Dalstra;F. Sejling;S. Overgaard

  • Spondylodiscitis. A retrospective study of 163 patients.

    Efthimios J Karadimas;Cody Bunger;Bend Erling Lindblad;Ebbe Stender Hansen

  • Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years

    Shallu Sharma;Chunsen Wu;Thomas Andersen;Yu Wang

  • Chemotaxis of human osteoblasts. Effects of osteotropic growth factors.

    Martin Lind;Bent Deleuran;Kristian Thestrup-Pedersen;Kjeld SØBalle

Frequent Co-Authors

Kjeld Søballe
Kjeld Søballe Aarhus University Hospital
Moustapha Kassem
Moustapha Kassem University of Southern Denmark
Flemming Besenbacher
Flemming Besenbacher Aarhus University
Jørgen Kjems
Jørgen Kjems Aarhus University
Katsuro Tomita
Katsuro Tomita Kanazawa University
Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto
Tine Brink Henriksen
Tine Brink Henriksen Aarhus University Hospital
Todd J. Albert
Todd J. Albert Hospital for Special Surgery
James S. Harrop
James S. Harrop Thomas Jefferson University
Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz
Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers doesn’t have to follow a traditional path. Many students choose alternative ways to enter the healthcare field—including flexible online degrees and certifications. If you’re already an RN, you can save both time and money with some of the cheapest rn to bsn programs available online, letting you advance your career affordably.

For those interested in becoming a nurse practitioner but without a nursing background, direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online provide a direct and efficient route. These programs are tailored for career changers seeking to fast-track into advanced clinical roles.

Not all nursing schools are equally competitive. Some may value experience over test scores, and if you’re looking for accessible options, you’ll want to consider easy nursing programs to get into. Choosing a less selective school can reduce stress and open doors faster.

For those interested in administrative roles, such as health information management, there are online programs as well. Explore the best medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid to build a strong foundation for roles in healthcare administration. All these pathways offer different entry points into the rapidly growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Cody Bünger

Trending Scientists