World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kenneth Strzepek

Kenneth Strzepek

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
54
Citations
9774
World Ranking
3165
National Ranking
1123

Kenneth Strzepek publications per year

1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publications 1989: 1 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 1 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publications
1980 2026

267 publications in total across all disciplines

Kenneth Strzepek publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth Strzepek sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 241 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Kenneth Strzepek D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth Strzepek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth Strzepek is affiliated with MIT in the United States and works primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering. Their research focuses on several overlapping domains, including global and planetary change, economics and econometrics, water science and technology, ocean engineering, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The scientist's work addresses topics central to the Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies and water resources management and optimization. They also investigate climate change impacts on agriculture, climate change policy and economics, climate variability and models, water systems and optimization, and transboundary water resource management.

Recent publications by Kenneth Strzepek include the following papers:

  • "Climate change impacts and costs to U.S. electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure," 2020, Energy
  • "Climate effects on US infrastructure: the economics of adaptation for rail, roads, and coastal development," 2021, Climatic Change
  • "Spatial and sectoral benefit distribution in water-energy system design," 2020, Applied Energy
  • "Comment on 'Egypt's water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios'," 2022, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Extreme Events and Production Shocks for Key Crops in Southern Africa Under Climate Change," 2022, Frontiers in Climate

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kenneth Strzepek are:

  • Timothy S. Thomas
  • Channing Arndt
  • Charles Fant
  • Brent Boehlert
  • Jeremy Martinich

They have published regularly in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Frontiers in Water
  • Frontiers in Climate
  • Energy
  • Climatic Change
  • Applied Energy

Best Publications

  • Water futures: assessment of long-range patterns and problems. Comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world

    P. Raskin;P. Gleick;P. Kirshen;G. Pontius

  • Climate Change Impacts on Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Freshwaters: A Screening-Level Assessment

    Steven C. Chapra;Brent Boehlert;Charles Fant;Victor J. Bierman

  • A technique for generating regional climate scenarios using a nearest‐neighbor algorithm

    David Yates;David Yates;Subhrendu Gangopadhyay;Balaji Rajagopalan;Kenneth Strzepek

  • Estimating Future Costs for Alaska Public Infrastructure At Risk from Climate Change

    Peter H. Larsen;Scott Goldsmith;Orson Smith;Meghan L. Wilson

  • Comprehensive Assessment of the Freshwater Resources of the World

    Paul H. Kirshen;Kenneth M. Strzepek

  • Water resources for agriculture in a changing climate: international case studies

    Cynthia Rosenzweig;Kenneth M. Strzepek;David C. Major;Ana Iglesias

  • Characterizing changes in drought risk for the United States from climate change

    Kenneth Strzepek;Gary Yohe;James Neumann;Brent Boehlert

  • The future of global water stress: An integrated assessment

    C. Adam Schlosser;Kenneth Strzepek;Xiang Gao;Charles Fant

  • Competition for water for the food system.

    Kenneth Strzepek;Brent Boehlert

  • Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins

    Lucia De Stefano;James Duncan;Shlomi Dinar;Kerstin Stahl

  • Key Economic Sectors and Services

    Douglas J. Arent;Richard S.J. Tol;Eberhard Faust;Joseph P. Hella

  • Predicting key malaria transmission factors, biting and entomological inoculation rates, using modelled soil moisture in Kenya

    Jonathan A. Patz;Kenneth Strzepek;Subhash Lele;Maureen Hedden

  • The impact of climate change on wind and solar resources in southern Africa

    Charles Fant;C. Adam Schlosser;Kenneth Strzepek

  • Global water data: A newly endangered species

    C. Vörösmarty;A. Askew;W. Grabs;R. G. Barry

  • MODELING THE NILE BASIN UNDER CLIMATIC CHANGE

    David N. Yates;Kenneth M. Strzepek

  • Enhancing the climate resilience of Africa's infrastructure : the power and water sectors

    Raffaello Cervigni;Rikard Liden;James E. Neumann;Kenneth M. Strzepek

  • The value of the high Aswan Dam to the Egyptian economy

    Kenneth M. Strzepek;Kenneth M. Strzepek;Gary W. Yohe;Richard S.J. Tol;Richard S.J. Tol;Richard S.J. Tol;Mark W. Rosegrant

  • Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security in Tanzania

    Channing Arndt;William Farmer;Kenneth Strzepek;James Thurlow

  • AN ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRATED CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY OF EGYPT

    David N. Yates;Kenneth M. Strzepek

  • Learning about climate change uncertainty enables flexible water infrastructure planning

    Sarah Marie Fletcher;Megan Lickley;Kenneth Strzepek

  • Partial costs of global climate change adaptation for the supply of raw industrial and municipal water: a methodology and application

    Philip J Ward;Kenneth M Strzepek;W Pieter Pauw;Luke M Brander

Frequent Co-Authors

James Thurlow
James Thurlow International Food Policy Research Institute
Channing Arndt
Channing Arndt International Food Policy Research Institute
David Yates
David Yates National Center for Atmospheric Research
Jeremy Martinich
Jeremy Martinich Environmental Protection Agency
Sherman Robinson
Sherman Robinson International Food Policy Research Institute
Mark W. Rosegrant
Mark W. Rosegrant International Food Policy Research Institute
Steven C. Chapra
Steven C. Chapra Tufts University
Gary W. Yohe
Gary W. Yohe Wesleyan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to interdisciplinary career paths, especially when paired with advanced degrees in health sciences and education. Many students with a science background look to bridge programs to enhance their qualifications quickly and efficiently. For example, asn to np programs offer a unique path for those holding an associate nursing degree to become nurse practitioners—ideal for those interested in ecological health and public policy.

If you do not have a traditional nursing background, there are options like online msn programs for non nurses that cater to science graduates aiming for advanced nursing roles. Additionally, choosing the right institution is crucial for online RN to BSN degrees. Comparing capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn can help you select a program that aligns with your career goals and learning preferences.

For those seeking affordability, consider researching the cheapest bsn to msn online options available. Investing in these online degrees can help ecology and evolution graduates diversify their expertise and contribute to fields like environmental health, conservation policy, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth Strzepek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles