World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12818 12063 1199 1148 354 25101

Catherine Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Catherine Smith between 1962 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Catherine Smith published across 64 years, from 1962 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2025. 87 of the 539 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2025. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 45 publications 2023: 49 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 56 publications
1962 2025

539 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Catherine Smith: publications per year, 1962 to 2025
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 4
1993 4
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 4
2001 3
2002 3
2003 2
2004 6
2005 9
2006 12
2007 8
2008 4
2009 12
2010 12
2011 21
2012 16
2013 19
2014 19
2015 16
2016 20
2017 32
2018 23
2019 27
2020 31
2021 41
2022 45
2023 49
2024 31
2025 56
Total 539
Download as CSV

Catherine Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 354 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 354
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Catherine Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Catherine Smith is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine, focusing primarily on immunology and dermatology, with significant contributions to the understanding and treatment of psoriasis and related skin diseases.

The scientist has authored numerous publications, particularly exploring psoriasis treatment and pathogenesis, dermatology and skin diseases, and immunology. Their research also addresses related fields such as asthma and respiratory diseases, health systems and economic evaluations, spondyloarthritis studies, autoimmune bullous skin diseases, and pharmaceutical studies and practices.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Catherine Smith include:

  • Juliet N. Barker
  • Satveer K. Mahil
  • Richard B. Warren
  • C.E.M. Griffiths
  • Nick Dand

Their most common publication venues reflect a focus on dermatology and immunology, featuring extensively in journals such as:

  • British Journal of Dermatology
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • JAMA Dermatology

Selected papers authored or coauthored by Catherine Smith include:

  • British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for biologic therapy for psoriasis 2020: a rapid update, 2020, British Journal of Dermatology
  • EuroGuiDerm Guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris - Part 1: treatment and monitoring recommendations, 2020, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (author: Alexander Nast)
  • EuroGuiDerm Guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris - Part 2: specific clinical and comorbid situations, 2021, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (author: Alexander Nast)
  • The effect of methotrexate and targeted immunosuppression on humoral and cellular immune responses to the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2: a cohort study, 2021, The Lancet Rheumatology (author: Satveer K. Mahil)
  • Factors associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psoriasis-insights from a global registry-based study, 2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (author: Satveer K. Mahil)

The main fields of study in which Catherine Smith is active include:

  • Medicine
  • Immunology and Microbiology

More specifically, their subfields of study cover:

  • Immunology
  • Dermatology
  • Rheumatology
  • Physiology
  • Economics and Econometrics

The central topics of their work involve:

  • Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
  • Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices

Best Publications

  • Identification of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity

    Lam C. Tsoi;Sarah L. Spain;Sarah L. Spain;Jo Knight;Eva Ellinghaus;Eva Ellinghaus

  • A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies New Psoriasis Susceptibility Loci and an Interaction Between HLA-C and ERAP1

    Amy Strange;Francesca Capon;Chris C A Spencer

  • Definition of treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis: a European consensus

    U. Mrowietz;K. Kragballe;K. Reich;P. Spuls

  • European S3-guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris

    D Pathirana;AD Ormerod;P Saiag;Catherine Smith

  • Mutations in IL36RN/IL1F5 are associated with the severe episodic inflammatory skin disease known as generalized pustular psoriasis

    Alexandros Onoufriadis;Michael A. Simpson;Andrew E. Pink;Paola Di Meglio

  • British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for biologic interventions for psoriasis 2009

    C.H. Smith;Alexander Vincent Anstey;J. N. W. N. Barker;A. D. Burden

  • Dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroid treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis with an inadequate response or intolerance to ciclosporin A or when this treatment is medically inadvisable: a placebo-controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial (LIBERTY AD CAFÉ)

    M. de Bruin-Weller;D. Thaçi;C.H. Smith;K. Reich

  • European S3‐Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris – Update 2015 – Short version – EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC

    A Nast;P Gisondi;A D Ormerod;P Saiag

  • Differential Drug Survival of Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)

    Richard B Warren;Catherine H Smith;Zenas Z N Yiu;Darren M Ashcroft

  • European Consensus Statement on Phenotypes of Pustular Psoriasis

    A.A. Navarini;D. Burden;Francesca Capon;U. Mrowietz

  • Characterization of Innate Lymphoid Cells in Human Skin and Blood Demonstrates Increase of NKp44+ ILC3 in Psoriasis

    Federica Villanova;Federica Villanova;Barry Flutter;Isabella Tosi;Isabella Tosi;Katarzyna Grys;Katarzyna Grys

  • British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for use of biological interventions in psoriasis 2005.

    C. H. Smith;Alexander Vincent Anstey;J. N. W. N. Barker;A. D. Burden

  • Identification of a Novel Proinflammatory Human Skin-Homing Vγ9Vδ2 T Cell Subset with a Potential Role in Psoriasis

    Ute Laggner;Paola Di Meglio;Gayathri K. Perera;Christian Hundhausen

  • UK guidelines for the management of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in adults 2016

    D. Creamer;Sheilagh Patricia Mary Walsh;P. Dziewulski;L.S. Exton

  • Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone acetate ointment in children with atopic dermatitis.

    Sakari Reitamo;Edwin J.M. Van Leent;Vincent Ho;John Harper

  • U.K. guidelines for the management of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in adults 2016

    D. Creamer;S. A. Walsh;Peter Dziewulski;L. S. Exton

  • Incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals with psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Eleanor J Samarasekera;Julie M Neilson;Richard B Warren;Jill Parnham

  • Neuropeptides induce rapid expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules and elicit granulocytic infiltration in human skin.

    C. H. Smith;J. N. W. N. Barker;R. W. Morris;D. M. Macdonald

  • A genome-wide asociation study identifies new psoriasis susceptibility loci and an interaction betwEn HLA-C and ERAP1

    A. Strange;F. Capon;C. C. A. Spencer;J. Knight

  • Identification of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity

    L. C. Tsoi;S. L. Spain;J. Knight;E. Ellinghaus

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Barker
Jonathan Barker King's College London
Christopher E.M. Griffiths
Christopher E.M. Griffiths University of Manchester
Francesca Capon
Francesca Capon King's College London
Richard C. Trembath
Richard C. Trembath King's College London
Michael A. Simpson
Michael A. Simpson King's College London
Neil McHugh
Neil McHugh University of Bath
Mark Lunt
Mark Lunt University of Manchester
Paola Di Meglio
Paola Di Meglio King's College London
Alan D. Irvine
Alan D. Irvine Trinity College Dublin
Frank O. Nestle
Frank O. Nestle Deerfield (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a medical career but are looking for alternative routes or supportive pathways, there are several flexible online programs that may fit your needs. For those interested in nursing, some online ADN programs for non nurses provide a convenient entry point without requiring prior clinical experience.

For students with an interest in the administrative or technology side of healthcare, medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid enable you to prepare for in-demand roles while managing financial responsibilities.

If standardized exam requirements feel overwhelming, there are nursing school without teas test options, which eliminate common barriers and simplify the admissions process.

For those aiming for leadership, an accelerated healthcare administration degree online can fast-track your advancement into management or executive roles in medical organizations.

Exploring these online programs broadens your career options and allows for greater flexibility, making medical and healthcare fields more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles