World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
36264
World Ranking
8006
National Ranking
4158

William E. Connor publications per year

1956: 1 publications 1957: 1 publications 1958: 4 publications 1959: 3 publications 1960: 1 publications 1961: 11 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 5 publications 1964: 3 publications 1965: 4 publications 1966: 5 publications 1967: 6 publications 1968: 6 publications 1969: 4 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 6 publications 1975: 7 publications 1976: 1 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 13 publications 1981: 9 publications 1982: 11 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publications 2013: 1 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publications 2017: 1 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publications
1956 2023

369 publications in total across all disciplines

William E. Connor publication distribution in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Connor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 361 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William E. Connor D-index placement in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Connor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

William E. Connor was affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research spanned multiple areas within medicine and veterinary sciences, with a focus on specific subfields such as small animals, surgery, and rheumatology.

Their work addressed key topics including:

  • Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
  • Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research

Throughout their career, William E. Connor collaborated extensively with several co-authors. Frequent collaborators included Benjamin N. Potkin, Jeffrey M. Hoeg, Gerald Salen, Arshed A. Quyyumi, and John E. Brush.

William E. Connor was recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians, an affiliation indicating involvement in the broader medical research community.

Best Publications

  • Importance of n−3 fatty acids in health and disease

    William E Connor

  • Biochemical and functional effects of prenatal and postnatal omega 3 fatty acid deficiency on retina and brain in rhesus monkeys

    Martha Neuringer;William E. Connor;Don S. Lin;Louise Barstad

  • Reduction of Plasma Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Apoproteins by Dietary Fish Oils in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia

    B E Phillipson;D W Rothrock;W E Connor;W S Harris

  • The Essentiality of N-3 Fatty Acids for the Development and Function of the Retina and Brain

    Martha Neuringer;Gregory J. Anderson;William E. Connor

  • Polyunsaturated fatty acids, hyperlipidemia, and thrombosis.

    S H Goodnight;W S Harris;W E Connor;D R Illingworth

  • Dietary omega-3 fatty acid deficiency and visual loss in infant rhesus monkeys.

    M Neuringer;W E Connor;C Van Petten;L Barstad

  • Beta-sitosterolemia and xanthomatosis. A newly described lipid storage disease in two sisters.

    Ashim K. Bhattacharyya;William E. Connor

  • Fish oil supplementation and risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable defibrillators: a randomized controlled trial.

    Merritt H. Raitt;William E. Connor;Cynthia Morris;Jack Kron

  • Coronary heart disease risk factors in school children: the Muscatine study.

    Ronald M. Lauer;William E. Connor;Paul E. Leaverton;Mary Ann. Reiter

  • Effect of fasting, refeeding, and dietary fat restriction on plasma leptin levels

    David S. Weigle;P. Barton Duell;William E. Connor;Robert A. Steiner

  • The comparative reductions of the plasma lipids and lipoproteins by dietary polyunsaturated fats: salmon oil versus vegetable oils.

    William S. Harris;William E. Connor;Martha P. McMurry

  • The effects of dietary omega 3 fatty acids on platelet composition and function in man: a prospective, controlled study

    Scott H. Goodnight;William S. Harris;William E. Connor

  • Dietary effects on brain fatty acid composition: the reversibility of n-3 fatty acid deficiency and turnover of docosahexaenoic acid in the brain, erythrocytes, and plasma of rhesus monkeys.

    W E Connor;M Neuringer;D S Lin

  • Growth and development in preterm infants fed long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

    Deborah L. O'Connor;Deborah L. O'Connor;Robert Hall;David Adamkin;Nancy Auestad

  • Differences in coronary mortality can be explained by differences in cholesterol and saturated fat intakes in 40 countries but not in France and Finland. A paradox.

    S M Artaud-Wild;S L Connor;G Sexton;W E Connor

  • Mutations in the Human Sterol Δ7-Reductase Gene at 11q12-13 Cause Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome

    Christopher A. Wassif;Cheryl Maslen;Stivelia Kachilele-Linjewile;Don Lin

  • Fish Consumption and Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease

    Richard B. Shekelle;Lavon Missell;Oglesby Paul;Anne Macmillan Shryock

  • The plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and diet of the Tarahumara indians of Mexico.

    W E Connor;M T Cerqueira;R W Connor;R B Wallace

  • n-3 fatty acids in the brain and retina: evidence for their essentiality.

    Martha Neuringer;William E. Connor

  • Visual Acuity, Erythrocyte Fatty Acid Composition, and Growth in Term Infants Fed Formulas with Long Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids for One Year

    Nancy Auestad;Michael B. Montalto;Robert T. Hall;Kathleen M. Fitzgerald

Frequent Co-Authors

William S. Harris
William S. Harris University of South Dakota
Joseph D. Matarazzo
Joseph D. Matarazzo Oregon Health & Science University
Alan Lucas
Alan Lucas University College London
David A. Savitz
David A. Savitz Brown University
Penny M. Kris-Etherton
Penny M. Kris-Etherton Pennsylvania State University
Lynn T. Singer
Lynn T. Singer Case Western Reserve University
Don P. Wolf
Don P. Wolf Oregon Health & Science University
David C. Bellinger
David C. Bellinger Boston Children's Hospital
Bennett A. Shaywitz
Bennett A. Shaywitz Yale University
Forbes D. Porter
Forbes D. Porter National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t have to follow a traditional route. There are numerous do you have to take a teas test for lpn programs that provide a more flexible entry point into nursing, especially for those looking to become a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) without sitting major entrance exams.

For students interested in the management side of healthcare, earning a degree in healthcare administration online is a popular option. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles and allow for accelerated study, helping you enter the workforce more quickly.

If you’re a registered nurse with an ADN and want to advance your qualifications, consider the adn to np bridge programs. These pathways help nurses move seamlessly toward a Master’s degree, opening doors to nurse practitioner roles.

Nutrition is another in-demand health field, and you can pursue the best online nutrition programs for a science-based approach to wellness and preventative care. Online learning means you can balance your studies with work or other responsibilities, making the process even more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Connor

Recently Published Articles