World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 25 2965 2685 844 688 72 2357

William C Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William C Smith between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William C Smith published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1983. 6 of the 85 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1983. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 9 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1978 2025

85 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William C Smith: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 3
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 9
1984 7
1985 3
1986 4
1987 8
1988 8
1989 4
1990 7
1991 5
1992 3
1993 2
1994 3
1995 3
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
2023 5
2024 3
2025 3
Total 85
Download as CSV

William C Smith publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William C Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 69–73 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 72 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71 72
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

William C Smith D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William C Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 25 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 25 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66 25
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

William C Smith is affiliated with Massey University in New Zealand. The primary focus of their research spans multiple interconnected scientific disciplines, including Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their subfields of study further define their work within Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, and Cell Biology.

Smith's research covers a range of specific topics, with notable concentration in:

  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Neurobiology and insect physiology research
  • Developmental biology and gene regulation
  • Zebrafish biomedical research applications
  • Leprosy research and treatment
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Marine ecology and invasive species

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin (LPEP): an international feasibility programme, 2020, The Lancet Global Health
  • Disruption of left-right axis specification in Ciona induces molecular, cellular, and functional defects in asymmetric brain structures, 2021, BMC Biology
  • Antagonistic Inhibitory Circuits Integrate Visual and Gravitactic Behaviors, 2020, Current Biology
  • A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy, 2020, Infectious Diseases of Poverty
  • The long-term impact of the Leprosy Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (LPEP) program on leprosy incidence: A modelling study, 2021, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Smith frequently collaborates with a number of researchers, including:

  • Matthew J. Kourakis
  • Cezar Borba
  • Yishen Miao
  • Erin Newman-Smith
  • Kerrianne Ryan

Publication venues where Smith's work appears most often include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Current Biology
  • Biological Imaging
  • The Lancet Global Health
  • BMC Biology

Best Publications

  • The piglet as a model animal for studying aspects of digestion and absorption in milk-fed human infants.

    P J Moughan;M J Birtles;P D Cranwell;W C Smith

  • Endogenous lysine and other amino acid flows at the terminal ileum of the growing pig (20 kg bodyweight): The effect of protein-free, synthetic amino acid, peptide and protein alimentation

    Christine A Butts;Paul J Moughan;William C Smith;David H Carr

  • Perchloric and trichloroacetic acids as precipitants of protein in endogenous ileal digesta from the rat

    Paul J Moughan;Alison J Darragh;William C Smith;Christine A Butts

  • Description and validation of a model simulating growth in the pig (20–90 kg liveweight)

    P. J. Moughan;W. C. Smith;G. Pearson

  • Endogenous amino acid flow at the terminal ileum of the rat determined under conditions of peptide alimentation.

    Christine A Butts;Paul J Moughan;William C Smith

  • The effect of food dry matter intake on endogenous ileal amino acid excretion determined under peptide alimentation in the 50 kg liveweight pig

    Christine A Butts;Paul J Moughan;William C Smith;Gordon W Reynolds

  • Fatty acid composition of backfat in large white pigs selected for low backfat thickness

    J.D. Wood;M.B. Enser;H.J.H. MacFie;W.C. Smith

  • The effect of amino acid and peptide alimentation on the determination of endogenous amino acid flow at the terminal ileum of the rat

    Alison J Darragh;Paul J Moughan;William C Smith

  • Plasma concentrations of LH, prolactin, oestradiol-17β and progesterone in sows weaned after lactation for 10 or 35 days

    R. N. Kirkwood;K. R. Lapwood;W. C. Smith;I. L. Anderson

  • Comparison of the slaughter method and simple T-piece cannulation of the terminal ileum for determining ileal amino acid digestibility in meat and bone meal for the growing pig

    A. Donkoh;P.J. Moughan;W.C. Smith

  • Determination and assessment of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients for the growing pig

    P. J. Maughan;W. C. Smith

  • Determination of endogenous amino acid flow at the terminal ileum of the rat

    Grant A Skilton;Paul J Moughan;William C Smith

  • Prediction of dietary protein quality based on a model of the digestion and metabolism of nitrogen in the growing pig

    P. J. Moughan;W. C. Smith

  • The apparent and true ileal digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids in lactic casein for the growing pig

    A.K. Kies;P.J. Moughan;W.C. Smith

  • An evaluation with piglets of bovine milk, hydrolyzed bovine milk, and isolated soybean proteins included in infant milk formulas. II. Stomach-emptying rate and the postprandial change in gastric pH and milk-clotting enzyme activity.

    Paul J. Moughan;Peter D. Cranwell;William C. Smith

  • Chromic oxide and acid-insoluble ash as faecal markers in digestibility studies with young growing pigs

    P. J. Moughan;W. C. Smith;J. Schrama;C. Smits

  • Preliminary observations on the use of the rat as a model for the pig in the determination of apparent digestibility of dietary protein

    P. J. Moughan;W. C. Smith;K. A. C. James

  • Effects of selection for low backfat thickness in pigs on the sites of tissue deposition in the body

    J. D. Wood;O. P. Whelehan;M. Ellis;W. C. Smith

  • Comparative performance and body composition of control and selection line large white pigs 2. Feeding to appetite for a fixed time

    Michael Ellis;W. C. Smith;Ruth Henderson;C. T. Whittemore

  • Fatness, live weight and performance responses of sows to food level in pregnancy

    C. T. Whittemore;W. C. Smith;P. Phillips

  • Comparative voluntary feed intakes, growth performance, carcass composition, and meat quality of Large White, Landrace, and Duroc pigs

    W. C. Smith;G. Pearson

  • Comparison of the ileal digestibility of amino acids in ground barley for the growing rat and pig

    P. J. Moughan;W. C. Smith;A. K. Kies;K. A. C. James

  • Allometric growth of chemical body components and several organs in the pig (20–90 kg liveweight)

    P. J. Moughan;W. C. Smith;E. V. J. Stevens

  • An evaluation with piglets of bovine milk, hydrolyzed bovine milk, and isolated soybean proteins included in infant milk formulas. I. Effect on organ development, digestive enzyme activities, and amino acid digestibility.

    Paul J. Moughan;Maria Pedraza;William C. Smith;Megan Williams

  • In-vitro determination of nitrogen digestibility and lysine availability in meat and bone meals and comparison with in-vivo ileal digestibility estimates

    Paul J Moughan;Jan Schrama;Grant A Skilton;William C Smith

  • The laboratory rat as a model animal for determining ileal amino acid digestibility in meat and bone meal for the growing pig

    A. Donkoh;P.J. Moughan;W.C. Smith

  • Effects of ractopamine on the growth and carcass quality of entire male and female pigs fed ad libitum or at a restricted level

    W. C. Smith;R. W. Purchas;A. Van Enkevort;G. Pearson

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. Moughan
Paul J. Moughan Massey University
Michael Ellis
Michael Ellis University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dorian J. Garrick
Dorian J. Garrick Massey University
Colin T. Whittemore
Colin T. Whittemore University of Edinburgh
Roger W. Purchas
Roger W. Purchas Massey University
C. W. Holmes
C. W. Holmes Massey University
J. D. Wood
J. D. Wood University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to Animal Science and Veterinary studies opens up diverse educational and professional opportunities. For those interested in behavioral health aspects linked to animals and humans, pursuing an substance abuse counselor degree online can provide valuable skills to support individuals and families in overcoming addiction challenges.

Similarly, professionals seeking to enhance their counseling expertise might consider marriage and family therapy master's programs online. These programs offer flexible pathways to develop therapeutic skills applicable to animal-assisted therapy and family dynamics involving pets.

For those aiming at advanced research or academic positions, enrolling in online counseling PhD programs can deepen understanding of human and animal psychological interactions, expanding career options within veterinary behavioral sciences.

Additionally, the field offers numerous high-paying roles beyond traditional veterinary positions. Discovering jobs with animals that pay well highlights opportunities in wildlife conservation, animal research, and more, catering to various interests and skill sets.

Best Scientists Citing William C Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles