| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental Sciences | 52 | 4417 | 4230 | 187 | 178 | 106 | 12576 |
The chart shows the history of publications by W. H. Schroeder between 1951 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. W. H. Schroeder published across 75 years, from 1951 to 2025, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2003. 1 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.
117 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1951 | 1 |
| 1952 | 0 |
| 1953 | 0 |
| 1954 | 0 |
| 1955 | 0 |
| 1956 | 0 |
| 1957 | 0 |
| 1958 | 0 |
| 1959 | 0 |
| 1960 | 0 |
| 1961 | 0 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 0 |
| 1964 | 0 |
| 1965 | 0 |
| 1966 | 0 |
| 1967 | 0 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 1 |
| 1970 | 0 |
| 1971 | 1 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 1 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 1 |
| 1979 | 1 |
| 1980 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 2 |
| 1983 | 1 |
| 1984 | 1 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 6 |
| 1988 | 5 |
| 1989 | 8 |
| 1990 | 1 |
| 1991 | 7 |
| 1992 | 5 |
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1994 | 5 |
| 1995 | 8 |
| 1996 | 7 |
| 1997 | 1 |
| 1998 | 5 |
| 1999 | 9 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 4 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 12 |
| 2004 | 7 |
| 2005 | 4 |
| 2006 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| Total | 117 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. H. Schroeder sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile
16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 41–50 | 21 | |
| 51–60 | 62 | |
| 61–70 | 133 | |
| 71–80 | 257 | |
| 81–90 | 361 | |
| 91–100 | 440 | |
| 101–110 | 492 | 106 |
| 111–120 | 541 | |
| 121–130 | 617 | |
| 131–140 | 544 | |
| 141–150 | 541 | |
| 151–160 | 539 | |
| 161–170 | 444 | |
| 171–180 | 444 | |
| 181–190 | 400 | |
| 191–200 | 377 | |
| 201–210 | 318 | |
| 211–220 | 282 | |
| 221–230 | 263 | |
| 231–240 | 220 | |
| 241–250 | 217 | |
| 251–260 | 180 | |
| 261–270 | 181 | |
| 271–280 | 155 | |
| 281–290 | 130 | |
| 291–300 | 127 | |
| 301–310 | 130 | |
| 311–320 | 85 | |
| 321–330 | 106 | |
| 331–340 | 80 | |
| 341–350 | 83 | |
| 351–360 | 75 | |
| 361–370 | 69 | |
| 371–380 | 52 | |
| 381–390 | 54 | |
| 391–400 | 56 | |
| 401–410 | 44 | |
| 411–420 | 40 | |
| 421–430 | 36 | |
| 431–440 | 25 | |
| 441–450 | 25 | |
| 451–460 | 32 | |
| 461–470 | 29 | |
| 471–480 | 21 | |
| 481–490 | 26 | |
| 491–500 | 26 | |
| 501–510 | 17 | |
| 511–520 | 19 | |
| 521–530 | 15 | |
| 531–540 | 22 | |
| 541–550 | 12 | |
| 551–560 | 15 | |
| 561–570 | 11 | |
| 571–580 | 19 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 9 | |
| 601–610 | 7 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 5 | |
| 631–640 | 5 | |
| 641–650 | 6 | |
| 651–660 | 3 | |
| 661–670 | 3 | |
| 671–680 | 4 | |
| 681–689 | 4 | |
| 690+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. H. Schroeder sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile
55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 12 | |
| 31 | 26 | |
| 32 | 51 | |
| 33 | 88 | |
| 34 | 123 | |
| 35 | 163 | |
| 36 | 206 | |
| 37 | 267 | |
| 38 | 265 | |
| 39 | 275 | |
| 40 | 321 | |
| 41 | 343 | |
| 42 | 305 | |
| 43 | 336 | |
| 44 | 330 | |
| 45 | 348 | |
| 46 | 291 | |
| 47 | 275 | |
| 48 | 272 | |
| 49 | 273 | |
| 50 | 263 | |
| 51 | 232 | |
| 52 | 266 | 52 |
| 53 | 217 | |
| 54 | 198 | |
| 55 | 177 | |
| 56 | 202 | |
| 57 | 204 | |
| 58 | 166 | |
| 59 | 177 | |
| 60 | 166 | |
| 61 | 152 | |
| 62 | 143 | |
| 63 | 150 | |
| 64 | 124 | |
| 65 | 119 | |
| 66 | 120 | |
| 67 | 118 | |
| 68 | 82 | |
| 69 | 98 | |
| 70 | 94 | |
| 71 | 105 | |
| 72 | 74 | |
| 73 | 84 | |
| 74 | 70 | |
| 75 | 67 | |
| 76 | 78 | |
| 77 | 60 | |
| 78 | 59 | |
| 79 | 52 | |
| 80 | 47 | |
| 81 | 38 | |
| 82 | 48 | |
| 83 | 42 | |
| 84 | 42 | |
| 85 | 43 | |
| 86 | 29 | |
| 87 | 37 | |
| 88 | 29 | |
| 89 | 30 | |
| 90 | 34 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 22 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 19 | |
| 95 | 24 | |
| 96 | 21 | |
| 97 | 20 | |
| 98 | 24 | |
| 99 | 17 | |
| 100 | 17 | |
| 101 | 21 | |
| 102 | 25 | |
| 103 | 18 | |
| 104 | 26 | |
| 105 | 20 | |
| 106 | 15 | |
| 107 | 10 | |
| 108 | 13 | |
| 109 | 15 | |
| 110 | 12 | |
| 111 | 8 | |
| 112 | 7 | |
| 113 | 9 | |
| 114 | 6 | |
| 115 | 12 | |
| 116 | 7 | |
| 117 | 8 | |
| 118 | 3 | |
| 119 | 5 | |
| 120 | 7 | |
| 121 | 2 | |
| 122 | 4 | |
| 123 | 8 | |
| 124 | 7 | |
| 125 | 9 | |
| 126+ | 92 |
William H. Schroeder;John Munthe
W. H. Schroeder;K. G. Anlauf;L. A. Barrie;J. Y. Lu
R.W. Macdonald;L.A. Barrie;T.F. Bidleman;M.L. Diamond
Ralf Ebinghaus;Hans H. Kock;Christian Temme;Jürgen W. Einax
R.M. Hoff;W.M.J. Strachan;C.W. Sweet;C.H. Chan
Julia Y. Lu;William H. Schroeder;Len A. Barrie;Alexandra Steffen
Z. F. Xiao;J. Munthe;W. H. Schroeder;O. Lindqvist
Parisa A. Ariya;Ashu P. Dastoor;Marc Amyot;William H. Schroeder
Unknown
S. E. Lindberg;T. P. Meyers;G. E. Taylor;R. R. Turner
William H. Schroeder;Greg Yarwood;Hiromi Niki
Franz Slemr;Ernst-Günther Brunke;Ralf Ebinghaus;Christian Temme
M. Sexauer Gustin;S. Lindberg;F. Marsik;A. Casimir
R. Ebinghaus;S.G. Jennings;W.H. Schroeder;T. Berg
Donald. Mackay;Sally. Paterson;William H. Schroeder
J Munthe;I Wängberg;N Pirrone;Å Iverfeldt
W. H. Schroeder;J. Munthe;O. Lindqvist
Christian Temme;Jürgen W Einax;Ralf Ebinghaus;William H Schroeder
Alexandra Steffen;William Schroeder;Jan Bottenheim;Julie Narayan
Alexandra Steffen;William Schroeder;Rob Macdonald;Laurier Poissant
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Environmental Sciences, there are several relevant online degree options worth exploring. A strong foundation in earth sciences can be gained through a geoscience online degree, which covers essential topics like geology, soil science, and natural resource management.
Another valuable field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a critical role in environmental data analysis and spatial mapping. Students can find some of the best GIS programs offered online, providing practical skills for careers in conservation, urban planning, and environmental monitoring.
For those looking to bridge environmental science with public policy and administration, pursuing one of the easiest online MPA programs can be a strategic move. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in government agencies and nonprofit organizations focused on sustainability.
Additionally, integrating social perspectives is vital in addressing environmental challenges. An online bachelors degree programs in sociology can complement environmental studies by exploring the human dimensions of environmental issues, such as community impact and social equity.