World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
149
Citations
78086
World Ranking
1209
National Ranking
699

Stephen J. Forman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Forman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,420 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen J. Forman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Forman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 149 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Stephen J. Forman is affiliated with the City Of Hope National Medical Center in the United States. Their research output focuses primarily on medicine, with a significant concentration in oncology and hematology. Other subfields of study include public health, environmental and occupational health, immunology, and genetics.

The scientist's main topics of work are centered on:

  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction

Among the recent papers associated with this researcher are:

  • Effective combination immunotherapy using oncolytic viruses to deliver CAR targets to solid tumors, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Locoregional delivery of IL-13Rα2-targeting CAR-T cells in recurrent high-grade glioma: a phase 1 trial, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • Chlorotoxin-directed CAR T cells for specific and effective targeting of glioblastoma, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic determinants of response to blinatumomab in adults with B-ALL, 2020, Blood
  • CRISPR Screening of CAR T Cells and Cancer Stem Cells Reveals Critical Dependencies for Cell-Based Therapies, 2020, Cancer Discovery

Frequent co-authors collaborating with this scientist include:

  • Ryotaro Nakamura
  • Guido Marcucci
  • Monzr M. Al Malki
  • Ibrahim Aldoss
  • Anthony S. Stein

Common venues for their publications are:

  • Blood
  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Blood Advances
  • Cancer Research

Stephen J. Forman is recognized as a Member of the Association of American Physicians. Their scholarly output spans over 850 publications in medicine and its subfields, contributing to advancements in cell-based therapies and hematologic malignancies.

Best Publications

  • Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study

    Marilyn L. Slovak;Kenneth J. Kopecky;Peter A. Cassileth;David H. Harrington

  • Regression of Glioblastoma after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

    Brown Ce;Alizadeh D;Starr R;Weng L

  • Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study.

    Max S. Topp;Nicola Gökbuget;Anthony S. Stein;Gerhard Zugmaier

  • Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral-blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic cancers

    William I. Bensinger;Paul J. Martin;Barry Storer;Reginald Clift

  • Adoptive immunotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma using genetically modified autologous CD20-specific T cells.

    Brian G. Till;Brian G. Till;Michael C. Jensen;Jinjuan Wang;Eric Y. Chen

  • A randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus pulmonary infection in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplants; The City of Hope-Stanford-Syntex CMV Study Group.

    Gerhard M. Schmidt;David A. Horak;Joyce C. Niland;Steven R. Duncan

  • A transgene encoded cell surface polypeptide for selection, in vivo tracking, and ablation of engineered cells

    Xiuli Wang;Wen Chung Chang;ChingLam W. Wong;David Colcher

  • CD20-specific adoptive immunotherapy for lymphoma using a chimeric antigen receptor with both CD28 and 4-1BB domains: pilot clinical trial results.

    Brian G. Till;Brian G. Till;Michael C. Jensen;Michael C. Jensen;Jinjuan Wang;Xiaojun Qian

  • Persistence of malignant hematopoietic progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in complete cytogenetic remission following imatinib mesylate treatment.

    Ravi Bhatia;Melissa Holtz;Ning Niu;Rachel Gray

  • Selective ablation of acute myeloid leukemia using antibody-targeted chemotherapy: a phase I study of an anti-CD33 calicheamicin immunoconjugate.

    E.L. Sievers;F.R. Appelbaum;R.T. Spielberger;S.J. Forman

  • Bioactivity and Safety of IL13Rα2-Redirected Chimeric Antigen Receptor CD8+ T Cells in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma

    Christine E. Brown;Behnam Badie;Michael E. Barish;Lihong Weng

  • CD28 Costimulation Provided through a CD19-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor Enhances In vivo Persistence and Antitumor Efficacy of Adoptively Transferred T Cells

    Claudia M. Kowolik;Max S. Topp;Sergio Gonzalez;Timothy Pfeiffer

  • Antitransgene Rejection Responses Contribute to Attenuated Persistence of Adoptively Transferred CD20/CD19-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor Redirected T Cells in Humans

    Michael C. Jensen;Leslie Popplewell;Laurence J. Cooper;David DiGiusto

  • Thomas' hematopoietic cell transplantation

    Frederick R. Appelbaum;Stephen J. Forman;Robert S. Negrin;Karl G. Blume

  • Myeloablative Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Severe Scleroderma.

    K. M. Sullivan;E. A. Goldmuntz;L. Keyes-Elstein;P. A. McSweeney

  • Late mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and functional status of long-term survivors: Report from the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor study

    Smita Bhatia;Liton Francisco;Andrea Carter;Can Lan Sun

  • Identification of the major late human cytomegalovirus matrix protein pp65 as a target antigen for CD8+ virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes

    Elizabeth McLaughlin‐Taylor;Hema Pande;Stephen J. Forman;Becky Tanamachi

  • Comparison of chronic graft-versus-host disease after transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow in allogeneic recipients: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial.

    Mary E. D. Flowers;Pablo M. Parker;Laura J. Johnston;Alice V. B. Matos

  • Allografting with nonmyeloablative conditioning following cytoreductive autografts for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma

    David G. Maloney;Arthur J. Molina;Firoozeh Sahebi;Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein

  • RNA-Based Gene Therapy for HIV with Lentiviral Vector–Modified CD34+ Cells in Patients Undergoing Transplantation for AIDS-Related Lymphoma

    David L. DiGiusto;Amrita Krishnan;Lijing Li;Haitang Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Smita Bhatia
Smita Bhatia University of Alabama at Birmingham
Ravi Bhatia
Ravi Bhatia University of Alabama at Birmingham
Christine E. Brown
Christine E. Brown City Of Hope National Medical Center
John A. Zaia
John A. Zaia City Of Hope National Medical Center
George Somlo
George Somlo City Of Hope National Medical Center
Karl G. Blume
Karl G. Blume Stanford University
Daniel J. Weisdorf
Daniel J. Weisdorf University of Minnesota
Arturo Molina
Arturo Molina Sutro Biopharma
David G. Maloney
David G. Maloney Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Michael C. Jensen
Michael C. Jensen Seattle Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers but seeking flexibility, online degrees offer a variety of accessible entry and advancement options. Nursing programs delivered online, for example, provide pathways for both newcomers and experienced professionals.

If you are a registered nurse looking to advance your education, online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements offer a convenient route to a higher degree by removing traditional barriers like mandatory onsite practicals. For those wanting to move further into leadership or specialized practice, earning a doctorate can be streamlined with the shortest post master's dnp program, designed to accelerate your progress.

If you’re concerned about balancing work or family with doctoral study, consider an easiest dnp program online that caters to working nurses and emphasizes flexibility. For those just beginning their nursing journey, online lpn programs provide an efficient way to start a career in healthcare with minimal disruption to your lifestyle.

These online healthcare degrees create new career pathways, break down traditional barriers, and help you pursue your professional goals at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Forman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles