World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
7660
World Ranking
6412
National Ranking
2305

Stanley C. Tyler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley C. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 79 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stanley C. Tyler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley C. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanley C. Tyler is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a professional engagement within this institution, contributing to its research environment.

There are no recent papers listed for Stanley C. Tyler, which limits detailed insights into their most current research output or specific study areas based on publication titles. Similarly, there is no information on frequent co-authors, which makes it challenging to identify close collaborative partnerships or research networks.

The absence of data on frequent publication venues means there is no available record of conferences or journals where Stanley C. Tyler has regularly disseminated research findings. This gap restricts the ability to track their scholarly communication channels or preferred forums for academic exchange.

No book publications have been recorded, suggesting that their contributions may primarily reside in journal articles, conference papers, or other scholarly formats rather than monographs or edited volumes.

There is no listed information on the main fields or subfields of study for Stanley C. Tyler, so specific academic disciplines or specialized areas of expertise cannot be identified from the available data. Similarly, no main topics of work have been documented, which limits the understanding of their focus areas or thematic concentrations within their research.

There are no recorded awards or honors for Stanley C. Tyler in the provided data, which leaves their recognition status within the academic community undetermined.

Stanley C. Tyler is currently living, as indicated by the absence of data suggesting otherwise. This status implies the potential for ongoing contributions to their field and continued participation in academic activities.

Best Publications

  • Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability

    P. Bousquet;P. Bousquet;P. Ciais;J. B. Miller;J. B. Miller;E. J. Dlugokencky

  • North Siberian Lakes: A Methane Source Fueled by Pleistocene Carbon

    S. A. Zimov;Y. V. Voropaev;I. P. Semiletov;S. P. Davidov

  • Carbon and hydrogen isotope fractionation by moderately thermophilic methanogens

    David L. Valentine;Amnat Chidthaisong;Andrew Rice;William S. Reeburgh

  • Radiocarbon evidence for the substrates supporting methane formation within northern Minnesota peatlands

    Jeffrey P. Chanton;James E. Bauer;Paul A. Glaser;Donald I. Siegel

  • Emissions of Methyl Halides and Methane from Rice Paddies

    K. R. Redeker;N.-Y. Wang;J. C. Low;A. McMillan

  • Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the oxidation of methane by the hydroxyl radical

    Christopher A. Cantrell;Richard E. Shetter;Anthony H. McDaniel;Jack G. Calvert

  • Reduced methane growth rate explained by decreased Northern Hemisphere microbial sources

    Fuu Ming Kai;Fuu Ming Kai;Stanley C. Tyler;Stanley C. Tyler;James T. Randerson;Donald R. Blake

  • Global increase in atmospheric methane concentrations between 1978 and 1980

    Donald R. Blake;Edward W. Mayer;Stanley C. Tyler;Yoshihiro Makide

  • Carbon and hydrogen isotope fractionation associated with the aerobic microbial oxidation of methane, ethane, propane and butane

    Franklin S. Kinnaman;David L. Valentine;Stanley C. Tyler

  • Identifying the agricultural imprint on the global N2O budget using stable isotopes

    T. Perez;Susan E. Trumbore;S. C. Tyler;P. A. Matson

  • Methane oxidation and pathways of production in a Texas paddy field deduced from measurements of flux, δl3C, and δD of CH4

    S. C. Tyler;R. S. Bilek;R. L. Sass;F. M. Fisher

  • 13C12C Fractionation of methane during oxidation in a temperate forested soil

    Stanley C Tyler;Patrick M Crill;Gordon W Brailsford

  • Methane emissions from California rice paddies with varied treatments

    R. J. Cicerone;C. C. Delwiche;S. C. Tyler;P. R. Zimmerman

  • Isotopic measurements of atmospheric methane in Los Angeles, California, USA: Influence of "fugitive" fossil fuel emissions

    Amy Townsend-Small;Stanley C. Tyler;Stanley C. Tyler;Diane E. Pataki;Xiaomei Xu

  • High-Precision Continuous-Flow Measurement of δ13C and δD of Atmospheric CH4

    Rice Al;Gotoh Aa;Ajie Ho;Tyler Sc

  • Isotopic variability of N2O emissions from tropical forest soils

    T. Perez;Susan E. Trumbore;S. C. Tyler;E. A. Davidson

  • Determination of the isotopic composition of atmospheric methane and its application in the Antarctic

    David C. Lowe;Carl A. M. Brenninkmeijer;Stanley C. Tyler;Edward J. Dlugkencky

  • Can N2O stable isotopes and isotopomers be useful tools to characterize sources and microbial pathways of N2O production and consumption in tropical soils

    S. Park;S. Park;T. Perez;T. Perez;T. Perez;K. A. Boering;Susan E. Trumbore

  • Population dynamics of type I and II methanotrophic bacteria in rice soils

    Jennifer L. Macalady;Andrew M. S. McMillan;Angela F. Dickens;Stanley C. Tyler

  • Modeling atmospheric δ13CH4 and the causes of recent changes in atmospheric CH4 amounts

    Mohan Gupta;Stanley Tyler;Ralph Cicerone

  • NITROUS OXIDE NITRIFICATION AND DENITRIFICATION 15N ENRICHMENT FACTORS FROM AMAZON FOREST SOILS

    Tibisay Perez;Tibisay Perez;Diana Garcia-Montiel;Susan E. Trumbore;Stanley Tyler

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald R. Blake
Donald R. Blake University of California, Irvine
Elliot L Atlas
Elliot L Atlas University of Miami
Susan E. Trumbore
Susan E. Trumbore Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
William S. Reeburgh
William S. Reeburgh University of California, Irvine
Ralph J. Cicerone
Ralph J. Cicerone National Academy of Sciences
David L. Valentine
David L. Valentine University of California, Santa Barbara
F. Sherwood Rowland
F. Sherwood Rowland University of California, Irvine
Bruce H. Vaughn
Bruce H. Vaughn University of Colorado Boulder
Thomas Röckmann
Thomas Röckmann Utrecht University
Edward J. Dlugokencky
Edward J. Dlugokencky National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and deepen expertise. Fields like geology are closely connected, and numerous accredited programs offer geology degrees online, enabling students to study earth sciences flexibly while gaining critical knowledge about natural processes and resource management.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are also highly valuable for environmental professionals who analyze spatial data to address ecological challenges. Exploring the best GIS programs in the US can provide specialized training in mapping and spatial analysis, essential for fields like conservation and urban planning.

Additionally, policy and administrative roles in environmental management often benefit from advanced public administration education. Many students opt for 1 year MPA programs that focus on leadership and organizational skills needed to influence environmental policy and guide sustainable initiatives effectively.

Understanding social factors is crucial in addressing environmental issues. Online sociology bachelor degree programs help students learn about societal behaviors and structures, preparing them to tackle environmental justice, community impact, and public engagement challenges.

Exploring these related degrees—geology, GIS, public administration, and sociology—can significantly enhance career pathways, providing a multidisciplinary foundation necessary for tackling complex environmental problems.

Learn more by visiting geology degrees online, best gis programs in the us, 1 year mpa programs, and best online sociology bachelor degree.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley C. Tyler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles