World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
7258
World Ranking
8794
National Ranking
3145

Robert A. Hoke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Hoke sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 70 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert A. Hoke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Hoke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert A. Hoke is affiliated with DuPont in the United States and has focused their research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their work explores various subfields, such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's research covers multiple interconnected topics, including:

  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts

Robert A. Hoke has contributed to the academic community through publications in the journal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. The most notable recent paper is titled "Assessing the Ecological Risks of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Current State-of-the- Science and a Proposed Path Forward", published in 2020. This paper has garnered significant attention with 358 citations.

Frequent collaborators in Robert A. Hoke's research include:

  • Gerald T. Ankley
  • P.M. Cureton
  • Magali Houde
  • Anupama Kumar
  • Jessy Kurias

Their work integrates multidisciplinary perspectives on chemical safety and environmental impact assessment, emphasizing the risks associated with persistent organic pollutants such as PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). By addressing both toxicological outcomes and environmental chemistry, the scientist contributes to identifying pathways for managing chemical contaminants in ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • Are PFCAs Bioaccumulative? A Critical Review and Comparison with Regulatory Criteria and Persistent Lipophilic Compounds

    Jason M. Conder;Robert A. Hoke;Watze de Wolf;Mark H. Russell

  • Development of a base set of toxicity tests using ultrafine TiO2 particles as a component of nanoparticle risk management.

    David B Warheit;Robert A Hoke;Carol Finlay;E Maria Donner

  • Methods for measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates

    C.G. Ingersoll;G.T. Ankley;G.A. Burton;F.J. Dwyer

  • Assessing the Ecological Risks of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Current State-of-the Science and a Proposed Path Forward.

    Gerald T. Ankley;Philippa Cureton;Robert A. Hoke;Magali Houde

  • Toxicogenomics in regulatory ecotoxicology.

    Gerald T. Ankley;George P. Daston;Sigmund J. Degitz;Nancy D. Denslow

  • Freshwater Sediment Toxicity Bioassessment: Rationale for Species Selection and Test Design

    John P. Giesy;Robert A. Hoke

  • Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials

    Patricia A. Holden;Jorge L. Gardea-Torresdey;Jorge L. Gardea-Torresdey;Fred Klaessig;Ronald F. Turco

  • Polyfluorinated chemicals in a spatially and temporally integrated food web in the Western Arctic.

    Charles R. Powley;Stephen W. George;Mark H. Russell;Robert A. Hoke

  • Toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants using freshwater invertebrates: A review of methods and applications

    Christopher G. Ingersoll;Eric L. Brunson;F. James Dwyer;Gerald T. Ankley

  • Bioaccumulation of PCBs from Sediments by Oligochaetes and Fishes: Comparison of Laboratory and Field Studies

    Gerald T. Ankley;Philip M. Cook;Anthony R. Carlson;Daniel J. Call

  • Evaluation of potential confounding factors in sediment toxicity tests with three freshwater benthic invertebrates

    Gerald T. Ankley;Duane A. Benoit;James C. Balogh;Trefor B. Reynoldson

  • Assessing potential bioavailability of metals in sediments: A proposed approach

    Gerald T. Ankley;Nelson A. Thomas;Dominic M. Di Toro;David J. Hansen

  • Development and evaluation of test methods for benthic invertebrates and sediments: Effects of flow rate and feeding on water quality and exposure conditions

    Gerald T. Ankley;Duane A. Benoit;Robert A. Hoke;Edward N. Leonard

  • Seasonal variation of acid volatile sulfide concentration in sediment cores from three northeastern Minnesota lakes

    E. N. Leonard;V. R. Mattson;D. A. Benoit;R. A. Hoke

  • Organic carbon partitioning as a basis for predicting the toxicity of chlorpyrifos in sediments

    Gerald T. Ankley;Daniel J. Call;Julie S. Cox;Michael D. Kahl

  • Integrated assessment of contaminated sediments in the lower Fox River and Green Bay, Wisconsin.

    Gerald T. Ankley;Keith Lodge;Daniel J. Call;Mary D. Balcer

  • Comparing laboratory and field measured bioaccumulation endpoints.

    Lawrence P Burkhard;Jon A Arnot;Michelle R Embry;Kevin J Farley

  • Evaluation of equilibrium partitioning theory for predicting acute toxicity of field-collected sediments contaminated with DDT, DDE and DDD to the amphipod Hyalella azteca

    R.A. Hoke;A.M. Cotter;T. Goldenstein;P.A. Kosian

  • Assessing and managing contaminated sediments: part I, developing an effective investigation and risk evaluation strategy.

    Sabine E. Apitz;John W. Davis;Ken Finkelstein;David W. Hohreiter

  • Application of frog embryo teratogenesis assay-Xenopus to ecological risk assessment.

    Robert A. Hoke;Gerald T. Ankley

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald T. Ankley
Gerald T. Ankley Environmental Protection Agency
John P. Giesy
John P. Giesy University of Saskatchewan
Jon A. Arnot
Jon A. Arnot University of Toronto
Christopher G. Ingersoll
Christopher G. Ingersoll United States Geological Survey
Thomas F. Parkerton
Thomas F. Parkerton ExxonMobil (United States)
Keith R. Solomon
Keith R. Solomon University of Guelph
Peter F. Landrum
Peter F. Landrum Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Bryan W. Brooks
Bryan W. Brooks Baylor University
Paul D. Jones
Paul D. Jones University of Saskatchewan
Damià Barceló
Damià Barceló University of Almería

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens the door to various related fields that complement and expand career opportunities. For students looking to explore alternatives, some consider the easiest bachelor degree to get to quickly start their professional journey without compromising foundational knowledge.

One popular choice is an online geology degree, which builds on earth sciences and environmental principles. Many institutions now offer geology online degree programs designed for flexible learning schedules.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly vital in environmental research and management. Students can pursue top-ranked GIS programs through options like the best GIS undergraduate programs to enhance their technical capabilities and job market readiness.

For those interested in leadership roles within environmental policy and public administration, quick advanced degree options such as 1 year MPA programs provide an efficient path to management positions in governmental and nonprofit sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Hoke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles