D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Business and Management D-index 40 Citations 19,240 71 World Ranking 662 National Ranking 300

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Management
  • Social science

His main research concerns Marketing, Strategic management, Top management, Industrial organization and Knowledge management. His study in Marketing is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Task and Organizational structure. The concepts of his Top management study are interwoven with issues in Qualitative research and Psychographic.

His Industrial organization research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Value capture, Business value and Rationality. His Knowledge management research integrates issues from Argument and Management science. His work carried out in the field of Management science brings together such families of science as Strategic financial management, Strategic sourcing, Strategic control, Competence-based management and Environmental resource management.

His most cited work include:

  • Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? (3282 citations)
  • Tautology in the Resource-Based View and the Implications of Externally Determined Resource Value: Further Comments (604 citations)
  • A Consumer Perspective on Value Creation (500 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Marketing, Industrial organization, Public relations, Knowledge management and Strategic management. His studies examine the connections between Marketing and genetics, as well as such issues in Manufacturing firms, with regards to Dynamism. His Industrial organization research includes elements of Value, Product market and Power.

Specifically, his work in Knowledge management is concerned with the study of Top management. Richard L. Priem has researched Strategic management in several fields, including Business value, Entrepreneurship and Management science. His Management science research incorporates themes from Qualitative research and Psychographic.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Marketing (31.48%)
  • Industrial organization (22.22%)
  • Public relations (17.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Sample (21.30%)
  • Shareholder (18.52%)
  • Accounting (15.74%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Richard L. Priem mainly investigates Sample, Shareholder, Accounting, Public relations and Marketing. His Accounting research includes themes of Stock options, Finance, Actuarial science, Principal–agent problem and Transparency. His work on Corporate social responsibility as part of his general Public relations study is frequently connected to Context, Leadership studies, Radar and Visibility, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

The Marketing study combines topics in areas such as Stakeholder theory, Stakeholder analysis and Knowledge management. His Knowledge management research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Action, Stakeholder, Stakeholder group, Value and Competitive advantage. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Business value, Strategic management is strongly linked to International business.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Value creation through stakeholder synergy (165 citations)
  • Value creation through stakeholder synergy (165 citations)
  • Repairing Trust in Organizations and Institutions: Toward a Conceptual Framework (88 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • Management
  • Social science

His scientific interests lie mostly in Sample, Accounting, Shareholder, Marketing and Public relations. He has included themes like Best practice, Compensation, Salary, Incentive and Normative in his Accounting study. His research integrates issues of Executive compensation, Information asymmetry, Audit committee, Transparency and Financial fraud in his study of Shareholder.

In the field of Marketing, his study on Competitive advantage overlaps with subjects such as Great Rift. The study incorporates disciplines such as Industrial organization and Power in addition to Public relations. His Knowledge management research incorporates elements of Action, Stakeholder theory, Stakeholder, Stakeholder group and Value.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?

Richard L. Priem;John E. Butler.
Academy of Management Review (2001)

5292 Citations

Tautology in the Resource-Based View and the Implications of Externally Determined Resource Value: Further Comments

Richard L. Priem;John E. Butler.
Academy of Management Review (2001)

1196 Citations

A Consumer Perspective on Value Creation

Richard Lee Priem.
Academy of Management Review (2007)

1012 Citations

Venture Creation and the Enterprising Individual: A Review and Synthesis

Christopher L. Shook;Richard L. Priem;Jeffrey E. McGee.
Journal of Management (2003)

953 Citations

Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance

Vinay K. Garg;Bruce A. Walters;Richard L. Priem.
Strategic Management Journal (2003)

653 Citations

Rationality in Strategic Decision Processes, Environmental Dynamism and Firm Performance

Richard L. Priem;Abdul M.A. Rasheed;Andrew G. Kotulic.
Journal of Management (1995)

558 Citations

Inherent Limitations of Demographic Proxies in Top Management Team Heterogeneity Research

Richard L. Priem;Richard L. Priem;Douglas W. Lyon;Gregory G. Dess.
Journal of Management (1999)

534 Citations

Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance

Richard L. Priem.
Strategic Management Journal (1990)

527 Citations

The Antecedents and Consequences of Top Management Fraud

Shaker A. Zahra;Richard L. Priem;Abdul A. Rasheed.
Journal of Management (2005)

516 Citations

The new corporate architecture

Gregory G. Dess;Abdul M.A. Rasheed;Kevin J. McLaughlin;Richard L. Priem.
Academy of Management Perspectives (1995)

468 Citations

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Priem

Michael A. Hitt

Michael A. Hitt

Texas A&M University

Publications: 40

Franz W. Kellermanns

Franz W. Kellermanns

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Publications: 40

Dean A. Shepherd

Dean A. Shepherd

University of Notre Dame

Publications: 36

R. Duane Ireland

R. Duane Ireland

Texas A&M University

Publications: 24

Nicolai Juul Foss

Nicolai Juul Foss

Copenhagen Business School

Publications: 19

David J. Ketchen

David J. Ketchen

Auburn University

Publications: 18

Kimberly A. Eddleston

Kimberly A. Eddleston

Northeastern University

Publications: 16

Holger Patzelt

Holger Patzelt

Technical University of Munich

Publications: 16

Abdul A. Rasheed

Abdul A. Rasheed

The University of Texas at Arlington

Publications: 14

Aron O'Cass

Aron O'Cass

Macquarie University

Publications: 13

Henk W. Volberda

Henk W. Volberda

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 13

Nicholas O'Regan

Nicholas O'Regan

Aston University

Publications: 13

Dean Tjosvold

Dean Tjosvold

Lingnan University

Publications: 12

Jay B. Barney

Jay B. Barney

University of Utah

Publications: 12

Lex Donaldson

Lex Donaldson

UNSW Sydney

Publications: 11

Pavlos Dimitratos

Pavlos Dimitratos

University of Glasgow

Publications: 11

Profile was last updated on December 6th, 2021.
Research.com Ranking is based on data retrieved from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG).
The ranking d-index is inferred from publications deemed to belong to the considered discipline.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us
Something went wrong. Please try again later.