World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8826 8242 892 852 60 6634

Jane H. Powell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane H. Powell between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane H. Powell published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2011. 4 of the 66 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2011. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

66 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane H. Powell: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 4
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 1
2009 2
2010 5
2011 6
2012 2
2013 1
2014 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 66
Download as CSV

Jane H. Powell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane H. Powell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 51–60 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 60 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138 60
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane H. Powell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane H. Powell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jane H. Powell is affiliated with Goldsmiths University of London in the United Kingdom. Their scholarly work primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, encompassing a total of 18 publications distributed across several specialized subfields such as Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Physiology, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

Their research addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Jane H. Powell has published in various academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
  • European Journal of Cancer Care
  • Journal of Transport & Health
  • Cities & Health
  • Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

Recent notable publications include:

  • "A natural experimental study of new walking and cycling infrastructure across the United Kingdom: The Connect2 programme" (2020) in Journal of Transport & Health
  • "A systematic review of the impacts of extreme heat on health and wellbeing in the United Kingdom" (2023) in Cities & Health
  • "'They were aware of who I was as a person': Patients' and health professionals' experiences of using the PEGASUS intervention to facilitate decision-making around breast reconstruction" (2021) in European Journal of Cancer Care
  • "A multi-centred sequential trial comparing PEGASUS, an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with usual care" (2021) in Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
  • "Economic evaluation of dialysis and comprehensive conservative care for chronic kidney disease using the ICECAP-O and EQ-5D-5L; a comparison of evaluation instruments" (2023) in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Collaborative work is a significant component of their research efforts, with frequent coauthors including Philippa Tollow, Nicole Paraskeva, Alex Clarke, Paul White, and Danielle Cox, each contributing to multiple projects alongside Powell.

Best Publications

  • White matter damage and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury.

    Kirsi Maria Kinnunen;Richard Greenwood;Jane Hilary Powell;Robert Leech

  • Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury.

    David J. Sharp;Christian F. Beckmann;Richard Greenwood;Kirsi Maria Kinnunen

  • Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial

    J Powell;J Heslin;R Greenwood

  • Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): Scale Development and Metric Properties

    Nicole Von Steinbuchel;J T Lindsay Wilson;Henning Gibbons;Graeme Hawthorne

  • Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): Scale Validity and Correlates of Quality of Life

    Nicole Von Steinbüchel;Lindsay Wilson;Henning Gibbons;Graeme Hawthorne

  • Motivational deficits after brain injury: effects of bromocriptine in 11 patients.

    J H Powell;S al-Adawi;J Morgan;R J Greenwood

  • Psychosocial outcomes at three and nine months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: predictors and prognosis.

    Jane H. Powell;N. Kitchen;J. Heslin;Richard Greenwood

  • The effect of aerobic training on rehabilitation outcomes after recent severe brain injury: A randomized controlled evaluation

    Andrew Bateman;F.Jane Culpan;Alan D. Pickering;Jane H. Powell

  • Relapse to smoking during unaided cessation: clinical, cognitive and motivational predictors

    Jane H Powell;Lynne Dawkins;Robert West;John F Powell

  • Psychosocial outcomes at 18 months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

    J Powell;N Kitchen;J Heslin;R Greenwood

  • Recreational use of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or ‘ecstasy’: evidence for cognitive impairment

    Sarajane Bhattachary;Jane H. Powell

  • Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: The clinical use of the QOLIBRI, a novel disease-specific instrument

    Jean-Luc Truelle;Sanna Koskinen;Graeme Hawthorne;Jaana Sarajuuri

  • Smoking, reward responsiveness, and response inhibition: tests of an incentive motivational model.

    Jane H. Powell;Lynne Dawkins;Robert E. Davis

  • QOLIBRI Overall Scale: a brief index of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury

    Nicole Von Steinbuechel;Lindsay Wilson;Henning Gibbons;Holger Muehlan

  • Individual differences in reactions to reinforcing stimuli are neither black nor white: To what extent are they Gray?

    Alan D. Pickering;Philip J. Corr;Jane H. Powell;Veena Kumari

  • Does post‐withdrawal cue exposure improve outcome in opiate addiction? A controlled trial

    Sharon Dawe;Jane Powell;David Richards;Michael Gossop

  • Theory of mind: Independence of executive function and the role of the frontal cortex in acquired brain injury

    L.J. Bach;F. Happe;S. Fleminger;J. Powell

  • Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument—the BICRO-39 scales

    Jane H. Powell;Karen Beckers;Richard J. Greenwood

  • Motivational deficits after brain injury: a neuropsychological approach using new assessment techniques.

    Samir Al-Adawi;Jane H. Powell;Richard J. Greenwood

  • A double-blind placebo controlled experimental study of nicotine: I—effects on incentive motivation

    Lynne Dawkins;Jane H. Powell;Robert West;John Powell

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Greenwood
Richard Greenwood University College London
Alan Pickering
Alan Pickering Goldsmiths University of London
Jeffrey A. Gray
Jeffrey A. Gray King's College London
Edmund Neugebauer
Edmund Neugebauer Witten/Herdecke University
Robert West
Robert West University College London
John Powell
John Powell King's College London
Andrew I. R. Maas
Andrew I. R. Maas University of Antwerp
Monika Bullinger
Monika Bullinger Universität Hamburg
Isaac Marks
Isaac Marks King's College London
Sharon Dawe
Sharon Dawe Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens a diverse range of career pathways and online degree options. From counseling to research, the field offers plenty of specialized areas to focus on according to your interests and strengths. If you're curious about salary expectations, especially as you consider advanced degrees, learning about behavioral psychologist salary ranges can help you make informed decisions about your future.

Many students wonder about the potential career options after MSc psychology. A master’s degree can lead to various rewarding roles, from mental health counselor and marriage therapist, to human resources specialist and researcher. The specific path you choose may depend on your area of specialization.

The psychology field is broad, offering different specialties in psychology such as clinical, forensic, educational, and sports psychology. Specializing can enhance your expertise and job prospects.

If you’re considering clinical practice, you may ask, can you become a clinical psychologist with a masters degree? While requirements vary by state, most clinical psychologist roles require a doctorate, though master’s-level professionals can still access other valuable positions in the mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Jane H. Powell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles