World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
36090
World Ranking
13461
National Ranking
722

Edmund Neugebauer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmund Neugebauer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 470 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edmund Neugebauer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmund Neugebauer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edmund Neugebauer is affiliated with Witten/Herdecke University in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and health professions, with a significant number of publications related to surgery and general health professions. They have also contributed to fields including public health, environmental and occupational health, economics and econometrics, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's work spans several main topics, including health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life; congenital diaphragmatic hernia studies; health and medical studies; clinical practice guidelines implementation; maternal and perinatal health interventions; assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy; and interprofessional education and collaboration.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Barbara Prediger, Nicole Ernstmann, and Holger Pfaff.

Notable publication venues for Edmund Neugebauer include:

  • Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Systematic Reviews
  • BMJ Open
  • Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
  • Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Edmund Neugebauer include:

  • Negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard moist wound care on diabetic foot ulcers in real-life clinical practice: results of the German DiaFu-RCT, 2020, BMJ Open
  • Synthetic Versus Biological Mesh in Laparoscopic and Open Ventral Hernia Repair (LAPSIS), 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes in inpatient care: a systematic review, 2022, Systematic Reviews
  • DNVF Memorandum Gesundheitskompetenz (Teil 1) - Hintergrund, Relevanz, Gegenstand und Fragestellungen in der Versorgungsforschung, 2020, Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Memorandum Register für die Versorgungsforschung: Update 2019, 2020, Das Gesundheitswesen

Best Publications

  • The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition

    Rolf Rossaint;Bertil Bouillon;Vladimir Cerny;Timothy J. Coats

  • Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: Development, validation and application of a new instrument

    E. Eypasch;J. I. Williams;S. Wood‐Dauphinee;B. M. Ure

  • Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis

    Stefan Sauerland;Thomas Jaschinski;Edmund Am Neugebauer

  • Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline

    Donat R. Spahn;Bertil Bouillon;Vladimir Cerny;Timothy J Coats

  • The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery

    J. Neudecker;J. Neudecker;S. Sauerland;E. Neugebauer;R. Bergamaschi

  • Management of bleeding following major trauma: an updated European guideline

    Rolf Rossaint;Bertil Bouillon;Vladimir Cerny;Timothy J. Coats

  • Early coagulopathy in multiple injury: An analysis from the German Trauma Registry on 8724 patients

    Marc Maegele;Rolf Lefering;Nedim Yucel;Thorsten Tjardes

  • A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Evaluating Regional Techniques for Postthoracotomy Analgesia

    Girish P. Joshi;Francis Bonnet;Rajesh Shah;Roseanne C. Wilkinson

  • Evidence of apoptotic cell death after experimental traumatic brain injury in the rat.

    A. Rink;Kar-Ming Fung;J. Q. Trojanowski;V. M.-Y. Lee

  • Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview.

    Dawid Pieper;Sunya-Lee Antoine;Tim Mathes;Edmund A.M. Neugebauer

  • Steroid controversy in sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis.

    Rolf Lefering;Edmund A. M. Neugebauer

  • Management of bleeding following major trauma: a European guideline.

    Donat R Spahn;Vladimir Cerny;Timothy J Coats;Jacques Duranteau

  • Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease

    L Köhler;S Sauerland;E Neugebauer

  • Psychosocial predictors and correlates for chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) - a systematic review

    Anke Hinrichs-Rocker;Kerstin Schulz;Imke Järvinen;Rolf Lefering

  • Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

    S. Sauerland;L. Angrisani;M. Belachew;J. M. Chevallier

  • Differential acute and chronic responses of tumor necrosis factor-deficient mice to experimental brain injury

    Uwe Scherbel;Ramesh Raghupathi;Michio Nakamura;Kathryn E. Saatman

  • Trauma Associated Severe Hemorrhage (TASH)-Score: probability of mass transfusion as surrogate for life threatening hemorrhage after multiple trauma.

    Nedim Yücel;Rolf Lefering;Marc Maegele;Matthias Vorweg

  • Experimental models of traumatic brain injury: do we really need to build a better mousetrap?

    D M Morales;N Marklund;D Lebold;H J Thompson

  • Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

    B. Habermalz;S. Sauerland;G. Decker;B. Delaitre

  • A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty

    H. B J Fischer;C. J P Simanski;C. Sharp;F. Bonnet

Frequent Co-Authors

Holger Pfaff
Holger Pfaff University of Cologne
Stefanie Dimmeler
Stefanie Dimmeler Goethe University Frankfurt
Jochen Schmitt
Jochen Schmitt TU Dresden
Abe Fingerhut
Abe Fingerhut Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Henrik Kehlet
Henrik Kehlet Copenhagen University Hospital
Tracy K. McIntosh
Tracy K. McIntosh Media NeuroConsultants
Beverley J. Hunt
Beverley J. Hunt Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Monika Bullinger
Monika Bullinger Universität Hamburg
Mario Morino
Mario Morino University of Turin
Donat R. Spahn
Donat R. Spahn University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a medical career in the USA opens the door to many related fields. For students who want to gain practical healthcare skills without the stress of major admissions tests, consider a nursing school that doesn't require teas. This can make entry into nursing programs more accessible and flexible, especially for online learners.

Those interested in shaping the future of healthcare without direct patient care might explore a degree in healthcare administration. These programs train students in healthcare management and leadership, preparing graduates for a variety of roles in hospitals, clinics, and health systems.

If you are already a registered nurse aiming for advanced practice, an adn to fnp bridge program can help you fast-track your career to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. These programs are designed for working professionals and are often available online.

Lastly, for those passionate about wellbeing and dietary health, there are many online degrees in nutrition that can lead to careers in health promotion, wellness, and counseling. Exploring these pathways can help you find a fulfilling role in the diverse healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Edmund Neugebauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles