World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
22318
World Ranking
18747
National Ranking
9340

Philip F. Stahel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip F. Stahel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 311 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip F. Stahel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip F. Stahel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip F. Stahel is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. Their research activities are primarily situated within the field of medicine, with a focus on surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, emergency medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and neurology. Within these disciplines, their major topics of work include cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, trauma and emergency care studies, hip and femur fractures, healthcare cost, quality, and practices, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, abdominal surgery and complications, and medical malpractice and liability issues.

Stahel has contributed to several publication venues, most notably:

  • World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • Patient Safety in Surgery
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • JAMA Surgery

Their recent papers demonstrate engagement with clinical safety and surgical guidance topics:

  • How to risk-stratify elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic?, 2020, Patient Safety in Surgery
  • Acute mesenteric ischemia: updated guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, 2022, World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document, 2022, World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines, 2023, World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • The role of teamwork and non-technical skills for improving emergency surgical outcomes: an international perspective, 2022, Patient Safety in Surgery

Stahel's frequent collaborators include researchers with notable records of joint publications, such as:

  • Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
  • Ernest E. Moore
  • Belinda De Simone
  • Massimo Sartelli
  • Edoardo Picetti

Their work collection reflects an active contribution to gaining knowledge in emergency surgery and patient safety, focusing on protocols and outcomes relevant to urgent clinical situations and postoperative care.

Best Publications

  • Management of bleeding following major trauma: an updated European guideline

    Rolf Rossaint;Bertil Bouillon;Vladimir Cerny;Timothy J. Coats

  • Inflammatory response in acute traumatic brain injury: a double-edged sword.

    Maria Cristina Morganti-Kossmann;Mario Rancan;Philip F Stahel;Thomas K Kossmann

  • Management of bleeding following major trauma: a European guideline.

    Donat R Spahn;Vladimir Cerny;Timothy J Coats;Jacques Duranteau

  • Mouse closed head injury model induced by a weight-drop device

    Michael A Flierl;Philip F Stahel;Kathryn M Beauchamp;Steven J Morgan

  • Wses Jerusalem Guidelines For Diagnosis And Treatment Of Acute Appendicitis

    Salomone Di Saverio;Arianna Birindelli;Micheal D. Kelly;Fausto Catena

  • Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates.

    Juan Agudelo;Matthias Schürmann;Philip Stahel;Peter Helwig

  • Closed head injury--an inflammatory disease?

    Oliver I. Schmidt;Christoph E. Heyde;Wolfgang Ertel;Philip F. Stahel

  • 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis

    L. Ansaloni;M. Pisano;F. Coccolini;A.B. Peitzmann

  • Role of cerebral inflammation after traumatic brain injury: a revisited concept.

    Maria Cristina Morganti-Kossmann;Mario Rancan;Viviane I. Otto;Philip F. Stahel

  • The definition of polytrauma revisited: An international consensus process and proposal of the new 'Berlin definition'

    Hans-Christoph Pape;Rolf Lefering;Nerida Butcher;Andrew Peitzman

  • Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines

    Federico Coccolini;Philip F. Stahel;Giulia Montori;Walter Biffl

  • Experimental closed head injury: analysis of neurological outcome, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, intracranial neutrophil infiltration, and neuronal cell death in mice deficient in genes for pro-inflammatory cytokines.

    Philip F. Stahel;Esther Shohami;Firas M. Younis;Karin Kariya

  • Production of cytokines following brain injury: beneficial and deleterious for the damaged tissue.

    M C Morganti-Kossman;P M Lenzlinger;V Hans;P Stahel

  • Interleukin-8 Released into the Cerebrospinal Fluid after Brain Injury is Associated with Blood–Brain Barrier Dysfunction and Nerve Growth Factor Production:

    Thomas Kossmann;Philip F Stahel;Philipp M Lenzlinger;Heinz Redl

  • Pancreatic infection in severe pancreatitis: the role of fungus and multiresistant organisms

    Beat Gloor;Christophe A. Müller;Matthias Worni;Philip F. Stahel

  • Direct retroperitoneal pelvic packing versus pelvic angiography: A comparison of two management protocols for haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.

    Patrick M. Osborn;Wade R. Smith;Ernest E. Moore;C. Clay Cothren

  • Postinjury coagulopathy management: goal directed resuscitation via POC thrombelastography.

    Jeffry L. Kashuk;Ernest E. Moore;Michael Sawyer;Tuan Le

  • How to risk-stratify elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic?

    Philip F. Stahel

  • Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing/External Fixation with Secondary Angioembolization: Optimal Care for Life-Threatening Hemorrhage from Unstable Pelvic Fractures

    Clay Cothren Burlew;Ernest E. Moore;Wade R. Smith;Jeffrey L. Johnson

  • IL-18: a key player in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration?

    Ursula Felderhoff-Mueser;Oliver I. Schmidt;Andreas Oberholzer;Christoph Bührer;Christoph Bührer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernest E. Moore
Ernest E. Moore University of Colorado Denver
Scott R. Barnum
Scott R. Barnum CNine Biosolutions
Markus Huber-Lang
Markus Huber-Lang University of Ulm
Walter L. Biffl
Walter L. Biffl University of California, Irvine
Esther Shohami
Esther Shohami Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Luca Ansaloni
Luca Ansaloni University of Pavia
George C. Velmahos
George C. Velmahos Harvard University
Massimo Sartelli
Massimo Sartelli University of Macerata
Fausto Catena
Fausto Catena University of Bologna
V. Michael Holers
V. Michael Holers University of Colorado Denver

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in healthcare doesn’t always mean following the traditional medical school route. Many students consider nursing as a dynamic and fulfilling alternative. Options like online direct entry msn programs are designed for non-nurses with a bachelor’s degree in another field. These accelerated programs help fast-track your path into advanced nursing roles.

If you’re concerned about competitive admissions, nursing schools with high acceptance rates can offer more accessible pathways without sacrificing quality. Some institutions even simplify the application process further by acting as nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams, removing a significant barrier for many prospective students.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are also flexible options available. The best online medical billing and coding schools provide accredited programs that can be completed remotely, often with financial aid opportunities. These pathways allow you to earn a respected qualification while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Philip F. Stahel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles