| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 40 | 5149 | 4779 | 2422 | 2207 | 95 | 100566 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Uhl-Bien between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Uhl-Bien published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2007. 6 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.
102 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 2 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 2 |
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 2 |
| 2002 | 1 |
| 2003 | 3 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 4 |
| 2007 | 7 |
| 2008 | 2 |
| 2009 | 3 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 4 |
| 2012 | 6 |
| 2013 | 5 |
| 2014 | 6 |
| 2015 | 5 |
| 2016 | 6 |
| 2017 | 5 |
| 2018 | 6 |
| 2019 | 1 |
| 2020 | 5 |
| 2021 | 4 |
| 2022 | 4 |
| 2023 | 5 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 4 |
| Total | 102 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Uhl-Bien sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile
11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 44–53 | 28 | |
| 54–63 | 61 | |
| 64–73 | 161 | |
| 74–83 | 225 | |
| 84–93 | 301 | |
| 94–103 | 390 | 95 |
| 104–113 | 406 | |
| 114–123 | 474 | |
| 124–133 | 453 | |
| 134–143 | 434 | |
| 144–153 | 407 | |
| 154–163 | 411 | |
| 164–173 | 391 | |
| 174–183 | 313 | |
| 184–193 | 319 | |
| 194–203 | 304 | |
| 204–213 | 285 | |
| 214–223 | 246 | |
| 224–233 | 213 | |
| 234–243 | 170 | |
| 244–253 | 167 | |
| 254–263 | 162 | |
| 264–273 | 138 | |
| 274–283 | 138 | |
| 284–293 | 113 | |
| 294–303 | 106 | |
| 304–313 | 95 | |
| 314–323 | 101 | |
| 324–333 | 81 | |
| 334–343 | 69 | |
| 344–353 | 56 | |
| 354–363 | 36 | |
| 364–373 | 42 | |
| 374–383 | 41 | |
| 384–393 | 44 | |
| 394–403 | 27 | |
| 404–413 | 30 | |
| 414–423 | 20 | |
| 424–433 | 29 | |
| 434–443 | 29 | |
| 444–453 | 25 | |
| 454–463 | 19 | |
| 464–473 | 21 | |
| 474–483 | 11 | |
| 484–493 | 17 | |
| 494–503 | 7 | |
| 504–513 | 6 | |
| 514–523 | 12 | |
| 524–533 | 10 | |
| 534–543 | 7 | |
| 544–553 | 6 | |
| 554–563 | 12 | |
| 564–569 | 8 | |
| 570+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Uhl-Bien sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile
34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 177 | |
| 31 | 210 | |
| 32 | 222 | |
| 33 | 188 | |
| 34 | 181 | |
| 35 | 243 | |
| 36 | 261 | |
| 37 | 272 | |
| 38 | 278 | |
| 39 | 300 | |
| 40 | 297 | 40 |
| 41 | 308 | |
| 42 | 313 | |
| 43 | 300 | |
| 44 | 269 | |
| 45 | 260 | |
| 46 | 228 | |
| 47 | 251 | |
| 48 | 203 | |
| 49 | 186 | |
| 50 | 187 | |
| 51 | 166 | |
| 52 | 138 | |
| 53 | 141 | |
| 54 | 131 | |
| 55 | 137 | |
| 56 | 109 | |
| 57 | 129 | |
| 58 | 95 | |
| 59 | 105 | |
| 60 | 106 | |
| 61 | 86 | |
| 62 | 94 | |
| 63 | 77 | |
| 64 | 79 | |
| 65 | 59 | |
| 66 | 68 | |
| 67 | 51 | |
| 68 | 49 | |
| 69 | 40 | |
| 70 | 43 | |
| 71 | 40 | |
| 72 | 50 | |
| 73 | 46 | |
| 74 | 43 | |
| 75 | 45 | |
| 76 | 45 | |
| 77 | 30 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 31 | |
| 80 | 29 | |
| 81 | 18 | |
| 82 | 21 | |
| 83 | 26 | |
| 84 | 15 | |
| 85 | 15 | |
| 86 | 19 | |
| 87 | 19 | |
| 88 | 12 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 19 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 13 | |
| 93 | 9 | |
| 94 | 13 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 7 | |
| 97 | 6 | |
| 98 | 6 | |
| 99 | 6 | |
| 100+ | 97 |
Mary Uhl-Bien is affiliated with Texas Christian University in the United States and works primarily in the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their research covers several subfields including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Business and International Management.
Their recent academic output includes notable papers such as Complexity Leadership and Followership: Changed Leadership in a Changed World (2021) published in the Journal of Change Management, Complexity and COVID-19: Leadership and Followership in a Complex World (2021) in the Journal of Management Studies, Complexity Leadership in the Nursing Context (2020) appearing in Nursing Administration Quarterly, and What do managers value in the leader-member exchange (LMX) relationship? Identification and measurement of the manager's perspective of LMX (MLMX) (2022) published in the Journal of Business Research. Another relevant paper where they are noted is Changing Leadership in Changing Times (2021) in the Journal of Change Management.
Mary Uhl-Bien's work engages extensively with topics including Management and Organizational Studies, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies, Chaos, Complexity, and Education, Organizational Learning and Leadership, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, and Innovation and Knowledge Management.
Frequent co-authors collaborating with Uhl-Bien include Melissa K. Carsten, A. Erin Bass, Ivana Milošević, John M. Maslyn, and Stewart Clegg. These collaborations underscore ongoing research partnerships primarily in the fields of organizational leadership and complexity.
The venues where Mary Uhl-Bien most frequently publishes include the Academy of Management Proceedings, Journal of Change Management, Journal of Management Studies, Nursing Administration Quarterly, and Journal of Business Research, demonstrating a focus on management and leadership scholarship.
Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
George B. Graen;Mary Uhl-Bien
Mary Uhl-Bien;Russ Marion;Bill McKelvey
Mary Uhl-Bien
Mary Uhl-Bien;Ronald E. Riggio;Kevin B. Lowe;Melissa K. Carsten
Russ Marion;Mary Uhl-Bien
Melissa K. Carsten;Mary Uhl-Bien;Bradley J. West;Jaime L. Patera
John M. Maslyn;Mary Uhl-Bien
Sean T. Hannah;Mary Uhl-Bien;Bruce J. Avolio;Fabrice L. Cavarretta
Mary Uhl-Bien;Russ Marion
George B. Graen;Mary Uhl-Bien
Mary Uhl-Bien;Michael Arena
Alan Bryman;David Collinson;Keith Grint;Brad Jackson
Mary Uhl-Bien;John M. Maslyn
Gail T. Fairhurst;Mary Uhl-Bien
Mary Uhl-Bien;Michael Arena
Mary Uhl-Bien;Sonia M. Ospina
Kenneth J. Dunegan;Dennis Duchon;Mary Uhl-Bien
Mary Uhl-Bien;George B. Graen
Kenneth J. Dunegan;Mary Uhl-Bien;Dennis Duchon
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a range of dynamic career opportunities. Programs such as social work, psychology, and applied behavior analysis are in high demand, especially for those seeking flexible study options.
For aspiring social workers, choosing one of the most affordable online msw programs is a smart way to earn a respected credential without overwhelming debt. If you are focused on qualifying faster, consider programs listed among the best accelerated msw online options to speed up your path to graduation.
Psychology is another popular discipline. Students looking to enter the field quickly can explore the fastest psychology degree options available online. For those interested in behavior analysis, pursuing a bcba degree can lead to specialized careers supporting individuals with developmental challenges.
Whether you choose a traditional or accelerated pathway, online degree programs offer flexibility and access to quality education, helping you advance toward your professional goals in the Social Sciences and Humanities.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Science and Technology Beijing
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Foundation for Arable Research
National Institute for Astrophysics
Johns Hopkins University
Columbia University
Saarland University
Goddard Space Flight Center
James Cook University
National Institutes of Health
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Tohoku University
University College London
University of Maryland, College Park
