World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
40
Citations
100566
World Ranking
5149
National Ranking
2422

Mary Uhl-Bien publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Uhl-Bien sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mary Uhl-Bien D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Uhl-Bien sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary Uhl-Bien is affiliated with Texas Christian University in the United States and works primarily in the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their research covers several subfields including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Business and International Management.

Their recent academic output includes notable papers such as Complexity Leadership and Followership: Changed Leadership in a Changed World (2021) published in the Journal of Change Management, Complexity and COVID-19: Leadership and Followership in a Complex World (2021) in the Journal of Management Studies, Complexity Leadership in the Nursing Context (2020) appearing in Nursing Administration Quarterly, and What do managers value in the leader-member exchange (LMX) relationship? Identification and measurement of the manager's perspective of LMX (MLMX) (2022) published in the Journal of Business Research. Another relevant paper where they are noted is Changing Leadership in Changing Times (2021) in the Journal of Change Management.

Mary Uhl-Bien's work engages extensively with topics including Management and Organizational Studies, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies, Chaos, Complexity, and Education, Organizational Learning and Leadership, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, and Innovation and Knowledge Management.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Uhl-Bien include Melissa K. Carsten, A. Erin Bass, Ivana Milošević, John M. Maslyn, and Stewart Clegg. These collaborations underscore ongoing research partnerships primarily in the fields of organizational leadership and complexity.

The venues where Mary Uhl-Bien most frequently publishes include the Academy of Management Proceedings, Journal of Change Management, Journal of Management Studies, Nursing Administration Quarterly, and Journal of Business Research, demonstrating a focus on management and leadership scholarship.

Best Publications

  • Building theories from case study research.

    Kathleen M. Eisenhardt

  • Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective

    George B. Graen;Mary Uhl-Bien

  • Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era !

    Mary Uhl-Bien;Russ Marion;Bill McKelvey

  • Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing

    Mary Uhl-Bien

  • Followership theory: A review and research agenda ☆

    Mary Uhl-Bien;Ronald E. Riggio;Kevin B. Lowe;Melissa K. Carsten

  • Leadership in complex organizations

    Russ Marion;Mary Uhl-Bien

  • Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study

    Melissa K. Carsten;Mary Uhl-Bien;Bradley J. West;Jaime L. Patera

  • Leader–member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality.

    John M. Maslyn;Mary Uhl-Bien

  • A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts

    Sean T. Hannah;Mary Uhl-Bien;Bruce J. Avolio;Fabrice L. Cavarretta

  • Complexity Leadership in Bureaucratic Forms of Organizing: A Meso Model

    Mary Uhl-Bien;Russ Marion

  • The Transformation of Professionals into Self-Managing and Partially Self-Designing Contributors: Toward a Theory of Leadership-Making

    George B. Graen;Mary Uhl-Bien

  • Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework.

    Mary Uhl-Bien;Michael Arena

  • The SAGE Handbook of Leadership

    Alan Bryman;David Collinson;Keith Grint;Brad Jackson

  • Reciprocity in Manager-Subordinate Relationships: Components, Configurations, and Outcomes

    Mary Uhl-Bien;John M. Maslyn

  • Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process

    Gail T. Fairhurst;Mary Uhl-Bien

  • Complexity leadership: Enabling people and organizations for adaptability.

    Mary Uhl-Bien;Michael Arena

  • Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives

    Mary Uhl-Bien;Sonia M. Ospina

  • Examining the Link Between Leader Member Exchange and Subordinate Performance: The Role of Task Analyzability and Variety as Moderators

    Kenneth J. Dunegan;Dennis Duchon;Mary Uhl-Bien

  • Individual Self-Management: Analysis of Professionals' Self-Managing Activities in Functional and Cross-Functional Work Teams

    Mary Uhl-Bien;George B. Graen

  • LMX and Subordinate Performance: The Moderating Effects of Task Characteristics

    Kenneth J. Dunegan;Mary Uhl-Bien;Dennis Duchon

Frequent Co-Authors

George B. Graen
George B. Graen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sean T. Hannah
Sean T. Hannah Wake Forest University
Patricia H. Werhane
Patricia H. Werhane University of Virginia
Peter D. Harms
Peter D. Harms University of Alabama
Ronald E. Riggio
Ronald E. Riggio Claremont McKenna College
Deanne N. Den Hartog
Deanne N. Den Hartog University of Amsterdam
Keith Grint
Keith Grint University of Warwick
David L. Collinson
David L. Collinson Lancaster University
Alan Bryman
Alan Bryman University of Leicester
William L. Gardner
William L. Gardner Texas Tech University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a range of dynamic career opportunities. Programs such as social work, psychology, and applied behavior analysis are in high demand, especially for those seeking flexible study options.

For aspiring social workers, choosing one of the most affordable online msw programs is a smart way to earn a respected credential without overwhelming debt. If you are focused on qualifying faster, consider programs listed among the best accelerated msw online options to speed up your path to graduation.

Psychology is another popular discipline. Students looking to enter the field quickly can explore the fastest psychology degree options available online. For those interested in behavior analysis, pursuing a bcba degree can lead to specialized careers supporting individuals with developmental challenges.

Whether you choose a traditional or accelerated pathway, online degree programs offer flexibility and access to quality education, helping you advance toward your professional goals in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Uhl-Bien

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles