World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
38
Citations
6267
World Ranking
4343
National Ranking
1075

Mary M. Peet publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary M. Peet sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 108 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Mary M. Peet D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary M. Peet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Horticulture
  • Agronomy

Horticulture, Pollen, Anthesis, Cultivar and Botany are his primary areas of study. His study brings together the fields of Agronomy and Horticulture. When carried out as part of a general Agronomy research project, his work on Sorghum and Horticultural crops is frequently linked to work in Water reservoir, Water transport and Sugar cane, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.

His research in Pollen is mostly concerned with Stamen. The concepts of his Anthesis study are interwoven with issues in Habit and Crop. His Cultivar research includes themes of Photosynthesis, Inflorescence and Growing season.

His most cited work include:

  • The Effect of Heat Stress on Tomato Pollen Characteristics is Associated with Changes in Carbohydrate Concentration in the Developing Anthers (232 citations)
  • Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under chronic, mild heat stress (214 citations)
  • Comparing heat stress effects on male‐fertile and male‐sterile tomatoes (203 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Horticulture, Agronomy, Greenhouse, Botany and Cultivar. His research integrates issues of Fruit set and Pollen in his study of Horticulture. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Anthesis and Germination.

Mary M. Peet has included themes like Waste management, Environmental engineering and Drip irrigation in his Greenhouse study. His work on Photosynthesis and Acclimatization as part of general Botany research is frequently linked to Irradiance and Liter, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Cultivar study combines topics in areas such as Crop yield and Yield.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Horticulture (47.13%)
  • Agronomy (43.68%)
  • Greenhouse (29.89%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2000-2018)?

  • Agronomy (43.68%)
  • Horticulture (47.13%)
  • Greenhouse (29.89%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Mary M. Peet mainly investigates Agronomy, Horticulture, Greenhouse, Cultivar and Lycopersicon. Mary M. Peet focuses mostly in the field of Agronomy, narrowing it down to topics relating to Solanum and, in certain cases, Rootstock and Heirloom plant. His Horticulture research integrates issues from Pollen and Human fertilization.

His Greenhouse research includes elements of Waste management, Environmental restoration and Agroforestry. His Cultivar research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Hydroponics, Crop yield and Hydroponic culture. Mary M. Peet conducts interdisciplinary study in the fields of Lycopersicon and Solanaceae through his research.

Between 2000 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • The Effect of Heat Stress on Tomato Pollen Characteristics is Associated with Changes in Carbohydrate Concentration in the Developing Anthers (232 citations)
  • Determining critical pre- and post-anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures (160 citations)
  • Pollen grains of heat tolerant tomato cultivars retain higher carbohydrate concentration under heat stress conditions (127 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Horticulture
  • Agronomy

His scientific interests lie mostly in Horticulture, Agronomy, Solanaceae, Lycopersicon and Cultivar. His Horticulture study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Pollen and Botany. His work on Pollen count and Germination as part of his general Botany study is frequently connected to Invertase, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

His study in the field of Greenhouse is also linked to topics like Organic farming and Environmental impact of agriculture. His work deals with themes such as Fertilizer, Compost, Drip irrigation and Poultry litter, which intersect with Greenhouse. The Cultivar study which covers Crop yield that intersects with Cultural methods, Irrigation and Hydroponics.

Best Publications

  • The Effect of Heat Stress on Tomato Pollen Characteristics is Associated with Changes in Carbohydrate Concentration in the Developing Anthers

    Etan Pressman;Mary M. Peet;D. Mason Pharr

  • Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under chronic, mild heat stress

    S. Sato;M. M. Peet;J. F. Thomas

  • Comparing heat stress effects on male‐fertile and male‐sterile tomatoes

    M. M. Peet;S. Sato;R. G. Gardner

  • Determining critical pre- and post-anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures

    Suguru Sato;Mary M. Peet;Judith F. Thomas

  • Pollen grains of heat tolerant tomato cultivars retain higher carbohydrate concentration under heat stress conditions

    N. Firon;R. Shaked;M.M. Peet;D.M Pharr

  • Response of ovule development and post-pollen production processes in male-sterile tomatoes to chronic, sub-acute high temperature stress

    Mary M. Peet;D.H. Willits;R. Gardner

  • Acclimation to High CO2 in Monoecious Cucumbers : II. Carbon Exchange Rates, Enzyme Activities, and Starch and Nutrient Concentrations

    Mary M. Peet;Steven C. Huber;David T. Patterson

  • The effect of high temperature and high atmospheric CO2 on carbohydrate changes in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) pollen in relation to its germination.

    Beny Aloni;Mary Peet;Mason Pharr;Leah Karni

  • Fruit Cracking in Tomato

    M.M. Peet

  • Effects of High Atmospheric CO2 and Sink Size on Rates of Photosynthesis of a Soybean Cultivar

    John M. Clough;Mary M. Peet;Paul J. Kramer

  • Greenhouse Tomato Production

    Chieri Kubota;A. de Gelder;Mary M. Peet

  • Role of excess water in tomato fruit cracking

    M.M. Peet;D.H. Willits

  • Grafting Tomato with Interspecific Rootstock to Manage Diseases Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and Southern Root-Knot Nematode

    C L Rivard;S O'Connell;M M Peet;F J Louws

  • Grafting Tomato to Manage Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in the Southeastern United States

    C. L. Rivard;S. O'Connell;M. M. Peet;R. M. Welker

  • High Tunnel and Field Production of Organic Heirloom Tomatoes: Yield, Fruit Quality, Disease, and Microclimate

    Suzanne O’Connell;Cary Rivard;Mary M. Peet;Chris Harlow

  • Crop-water relations

    I. D. Teare;M. M. Peet

  • Measurement of Chlorophyll Fluorescence as a Heat Stress Indicator in Tomato: Laboratory and Greenhouse Comparisons

    D.H. Willits;M.M. Peet

  • Plant Development and Harvest Yields of Greenhouse Tomatoes in Six Organic Growing Systems

    Janet F.M. Rippy;Mary M. Peet;Frank J. Louws;Paul V. Nelson

  • EFFECT OF NIGHT TEMPERATURE ON POLLEN CHARACTERISTICS, GROWTH, AND FRUIT SET IN TOMATO

    Mary M. Peet;Michael Bartholemew

  • Effect of Fire on Big Bluestem Production

    Mary Peet;Roger Anderson;Michael S. Adams

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank J. Louws
Frank J. Louws North Carolina State University
Paul J. Kramer
Paul J. Kramer Duke University
Chieri Kubota
Chieri Kubota The Ohio State University
Roger C. Anderson
Roger C. Anderson Illinois State University
Richard L. Snyder
Richard L. Snyder University of California, Davis
Steven C. Huber
Steven C. Huber University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Randall S. Alberte
Randall S. Alberte University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mary M. Peet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles