World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
51
Citations
8618
World Ranking
9976
National Ranking
399

Martin H. Stone publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin H. Stone sits on this spectrum.

50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 93 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

Martin H. Stone D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin H. Stone sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin H. Stone is affiliated with Chapel Allerton Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their scholarly output primarily centers on medicine, with a distinct focus on surgery and related subfields such as rehabilitation, public health, and economics within healthcare contexts.

Their research contributions encompass a broad range of topics including total knee arthroplasty outcomes, orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty, orthopedic infections and treatments, hip disorders and treatments, health systems and economic evaluations, healthcare cost and quality, and the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Stone include:

  • UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study (2022, BMJ Open)
  • Mid- to late-term follow-up of primary hip and knee arthroplasty: the UK SAFE evidence-based recommendations (2023, Bone & Joint Open)
  • Safety of disinvestment in mid- to late-term follow-up post primary hip and knee replacement: the UK SAFE evidence synthesis and recommendations (2022, Health and Social Care Delivery Research)
  • Reliability of slice-encoding for metal artefact correction (SEMAC) MRI to identify prosthesis loosening in patients with painful total hip arthroplasty - a single centre, prospective, surgical validation study (2022, British Journal of Radiology)
  • Association between outpatient follow-up and incidence of revision after knee and hip replacements: a population-based cohort study (2023, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders)

Stone's frequent coauthors reflect ongoing collaborations within the orthopaedic field and include:

  • Sarah R. Kingsbury
  • Lindsay K Smith
  • Philip G. Conaghan
  • Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
  • Andrew Judge

The venues in which Stone publishes are primarily specialized journals linked to orthopaedics, musculoskeletal disorders, and healthcare research:

  • Bone & Joint Open
  • BMJ Open
  • Health and Social Care Delivery Research
  • British Journal of Radiology
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Stone's work contributes to understanding outcomes and risk factors related to arthroplasty procedures, the reliability of imaging techniques for prosthesis evaluation, as well as evidence-based guidelines for the follow-up and management of patients after hip and knee replacement surgeries. Their research spans clinical outcome assessment, health economic evaluation, and the safety implications of health service changes, contributing data that informs clinical and policy decision-making in orthopaedic care.

Best Publications

  • Polyethylene particles of a ‘critical size’ are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro

    T R Green;J Fisher;M Stone;B M Wroblewski

  • The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements

    H.M.J. McEwen;P.I. Barnett;C.J. Bell;R. Farrar

  • Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles.

    Timothy R. Green;John Fisher;J. Bridget Matthews;Martin H. Stone

  • Comparison of the cytotoxicity of clinically relevant cobalt-chromium and alumina ceramic wear particles in vitro.

    M.A. Germain;A. Hatton;S. Williams;J.B. Matthews

  • Evaluation of the response of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes to challenge with in vitro generated clinically relevant UHMWPE particles of known size and dose

    J. Bridget Matthews;Alfred A. Besong;Tim R. Green;Martin H. Stone

  • Tribology of alternative bearings.

    John Fisher;Zhongmin Jin;Joanne Tipper;Martin Stone

  • Quantitative analysis of wear and wear debris from metal-on-metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator.

    P J Firkins;J L Tipper;M R Saadatzadeh;E Ingham

  • The influence of molecular weight, crosslinking and counterface roughness on TNF-alpha production by macrophages in response to ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles.

    Joanne Helen Ingram;Martin Stone;John Fisher;Eileen Ingham

  • Quantitative analysis of polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retrieved Charnley hip prostheses.

    J. L. Tipper;E. Ingham;J. L. Hailey;A. A. Besong

  • Comparison of wear, wear debris and functional biological activity of moderately crosslinked and non-crosslinked polyethylenes in hip prostheses.

    M Endo;J L Tipper;D C Barton;M H Stone

  • Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns.

    John Fisher;Hannah M. J. Mcewen;Joanne L. Tipper;Alison L. Galvin

  • A novel low wearing differential hardness, ceramic-on-metal hip joint prosthesis

    P.J. Firkins;J.L. Tipper;E. Ingham;M.H. Stone

  • Quantitative analysis of the wear and wear debris from low and high carbon content cobalt chrome alloys used in metal on metal total hip replacements.

    J. L. Tipper;P. J. Firkins;E. Ingham;J. Fisher

  • The effect of hyaluronic acid and phospholipid based lubricants on friction within a human cartilage damage model.

    Richard W. Forsey;John Fisher;Jonathan Thompson;Martin H. Stone

  • Characterisation of wear debris from UHMWPE on zirconia ceramic, metal-on-metal and alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses generated in a physiological anatomical hip joint simulator

    J.L Tipper;P.J Firkins;A.A Besong;P.S.M Barbour

  • Wear of surface engineered metal-on-metal hip prostheses

    J Fisher;X Q Hu;T D Stewart;S Williams

  • Comparison of the response of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes from different donors to challenge with model polyethylene particles of known size and dose

    J.Bridget Matthews;Tim R Green;Martin H. Stone;B Mike Wroblewski

  • A novel method for the prediction of functional biological activity of polyethylene wear debris.

    J. Fisher;J. Bell;P. S. M. Barbour;J. L. Tipper

  • Quantitative comparison of wear debris from UHMWPE that has and has not been sterilised by gamma irradiation

    A. A. Besong;J. L. Tipper;E. Ingham;M. H. Stone

  • Production of TNF-α and bone resorbing activity by macrophages in response to different types of bone cement particles

    Eileen Ingham;Tim R Green;Martin H Stone;Rick Kowalski

  • Quantification of third-body damage and its effect on UHMWPE wear with different types of femoral head

    H. Minakawa;M. H. Stone;B. M. Wroblewski;J. G. Lancaster

Frequent Co-Authors

John Fisher
John Fisher University of Leeds
Eileen Ingham
Eileen Ingham University of Leeds
Zhongmin Jin
Zhongmin Jin Southwest Jiaotong University
Philip G. Conaghan
Philip G. Conaghan University of Leeds
Peter V. Giannoudis
Peter V. Giannoudis University of Leeds
Duncan Dowson
Duncan Dowson University of Leeds
Tohru Sekino
Tohru Sekino Osaka University
Andrew Judge
Andrew Judge University of Bristol
Robert West
Robert West University College London
Nigel K. Arden
Nigel K. Arden University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin H. Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles