World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
68
Citations
14798
World Ranking
1526
National Ranking
25

Martin F. Fey publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin F. Fey sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 214 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Martin F. Fey D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin F. Fey sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: benefits for whom?

    Jan J. Cornelissen;Wim L. J. van Putten;Leo F. Verdonck;Matthias Theobald

  • Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

    Bob Löwenberg;Wim van Putten;Matthias Theobald;Jurg Gmür

  • Human delta Np73 regulates a dominant negative feedback loop for TAp73 and p53.

    Unknown

  • Induction of genes mediating interferon-dependent extracellular trap formation during neutrophil differentiation.

    Sibylla Martinelli;Mirjana Urosevic;Arezoo Daryadel;Patrick Antony Oberholzer

  • Risk assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and a normal karyotype.

    Unknown

  • ATRA resolves the differentiation block in t(15;17) acute myeloid leukemia by restoring PU.1 expression

    Beatrice U. Mueller;Thomas Pabst;José Fos;Vibor Petkovic

  • High activity of sorafenib in FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia synergizes with allo-immune effects to induce sustained responses.

    S K Metzelder;T Schroeder;A Finck;S Scholl

  • Inflammation-associated Cell Cycle–independent Block of Apoptosis by Survivin in Terminally Differentiated Neutrophils

    Frank Altznauer;Sibylla Martinelli;Shida Yousefi;Christine Thürig

  • The value of the MDR1 reversal agent PSC-833 in addition to daunorubicin and cytarabine in the treatment of elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in relation to MDR1 status at diagnosis

    Bronno van der Holt;Bob Löwenberg;Alan K Burnett;Wolfgang U Knauf

  • Long-term follow-up confirms the benefit of all-trans retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia

    Fenaux P;Chevret S;Guerci A;Fegueux N

  • Additional chromosomal abnormalities in patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) do not confer poor prognosis: results of APL 93 trial.

    Stéphane de Botton;Sylvie Chevret;Miguel Sanz;Hervé Dombret

  • Autophagy is required for self-renewal and differentiation of adult human stem cells.

    Souzan Salemi;Shida Yousefi;Mihai A Constantinescu;Martin F Fey

  • Value of different modalities of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor applied during or after induction therapy of acute myeloid leukemia.

    B. Löwenberg;M. A. Boogaerts;S. M. G. J. Daenen;G. E. G. Verhoef

  • Autologous and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation as salvage treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia initially treated with all-trans-retinoic acid: a retrospective analysis of the European acute promyelocytic leukemia group.

    S. de Botton;A. Fawaz;S. Chevret;H. Dombret

  • Outcome of Childhood Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia With All-Trans-Retinoic Acid and Chemotherapy

    S. de Botton;V. Coiteux;S. Chevret;C. Rayon

  • Axl expression is associated with adverse prognosis and with expression of Bcl-2 and CD34 in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML): results from a multicenter trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

    C Rochlitz;A Lohri;M Bacchi;M Schmidt

  • Neutrophil apoptosis mediated by nicotinic acid receptors (GPR109A)

    G Kostylina;D Simon;M F Fey;S Yousefi

  • Comparative therapeutic value of post-remission approaches in patients with acute myeloid leukemia aged 40-60 years

    J J Cornelissen;J Versluis;J R Passweg;W L J van Putten

  • Extramedullary relapse in acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all- trans retinoic acid and chemotherapy

    S de Botton;M A Sanz;S Chevret;H Dombret

  • Acute myeloblastic leukaemias in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    Martin Fey;C. Buske

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce E. Torbett
Bruce E. Torbett Seattle Children's Hospital
Alan S. Coates
Alan S. Coates University of Sydney
Richard D. Gelber
Richard D. Gelber Harvard University
Karen N. Price
Karen N. Price Frontier Science Foundation
Bob Löwenberg
Bob Löwenberg Erasmus MC
Aron Goldhirsch
Aron Goldhirsch European Institute of Oncology
Miguel A. Sanz
Miguel A. Sanz University of Valencia
Hans-Uwe Simon
Hans-Uwe Simon University of Bern
Pierre Fenaux
Pierre Fenaux Université Paris Cité
Alois Gratwohl
Alois Gratwohl University of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to a range of careers, including research, healthcare, and academia. Many students look for flexible online options to tailor their education to their lifestyle. For veterans or active military, online military friendly colleges provide supportive environments and unique resources to help balance study with service.

Students interested in applying their science background to social change can consider social work online master's programs, blending biological knowledge with social impact practice. For those drawn to mental health fields, there are also options like online masters in psychology, which often offer accelerated pathways for timely graduation.

Another good fit for Molecular Biology graduates interested in mental health care is an online masters in clinical mental health counseling. These programs train students to combine scientific knowledge with therapeutic skills, expanding career opportunities in both research and clinical practice.

Overall, online degrees make it possible to pursue advanced education and diverse career pathways in science, health, and social sectors, all from the convenience of home.

Best Scientists Citing Martin F. Fey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles