World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 10954 10290 315 298 624 29565

Manabu Mochizuki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Manabu Mochizuki between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Manabu Mochizuki published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2010. 8 of the 648 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2010. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 4 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 20 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 23 publications 2003: 27 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 35 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
1967 2025

648 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Manabu Mochizuki: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 1
1981 1
1982 4
1983 2
1984 3
1985 4
1986 5
1987 5
1988 7
1989 5
1990 7
1991 5
1992 16
1993 20
1994 12
1995 13
1996 14
1997 15
1998 12
1999 18
2000 14
2001 18
2002 23
2003 27
2004 20
2005 14
2006 35
2007 25
2008 28
2009 32
2010 39
2011 28
2012 31
2013 27
2014 20
2015 13
2016 7
2017 9
2018 10
2019 9
2020 16
2021 7
2022 5
2023 8
2024 6
2025 2
Total 648
Download as CSV

Manabu Mochizuki publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manabu Mochizuki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 624 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 624
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Manabu Mochizuki D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manabu Mochizuki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Manabu Mochizuki is affiliated with Tokyo Medical and Dental University in Japan and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly within the field of ophthalmology. Their body of work spans 94 publications categorized under medicine, with significant subfields including ophthalmology, neurology, surgery, epidemiology, and physiology.

The scientist's research covers a variety of topics focused on ocular health and systemic disease interactions. Major themes include ocular diseases and Behçet's syndrome, retinal and optic conditions, central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, lymphoma diagnosis and treatment broadly, sarcoidosis and beryllium toxicity research, ocular infections and treatments, and viral-associated cancers and disorders.

Key recent publications by Manabu Mochizuki include:

  • Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Tubercular Uveitis-Report 1 (2020, Ophthalmology)
  • Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Tubercular Uveitis-Report 2 (2020, Ophthalmology)
  • Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis of Vitreoretinal Lymphoma (2021, Ocular Immunology and Inflammation)
  • Challenges in the diagnosis and management of vitreoretinal lymphoma - Clinical and basic approaches (2022, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research)
  • Distinguishing Features of Anterior Uveitis Caused by Herpes Simplex Virus, Varicella-Zoster Virus, and Cytomegalovirus (2021, American Journal of Ophthalmology)

Manabu Mochizuki collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Justine R. Smith, Hiroshi Takase, Sarakshi Mahajan, Soon-Phaik Chee, and Peter McCluskey. These collaborations contribute to a multidisciplinary approach within their research fields.

Their work is predominantly published in the following venues:

  • Ocular Immunology and Inflammation
  • Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
  • Ophthalmology
  • Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

The scientist's research centers on clinical diagnostics, treatment guidelines, and understanding ocular manifestations of systemic diseases, emphasizing infectious and neoplastic conditions affecting the eye. Through a combination of clinical and laboratory research, their contributions address challenges in diagnosing and managing complex ocular conditions, particularly vitreoretinal lymphoma and tubercular uveitis.

Best Publications

  • International Criteria for the Diagnosis of Ocular Sarcoidosis: Results of the First International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS)

    Carl P Herbort;Narsing A Rao;Manabu Mochizuki

  • Genome-wide association studies identify IL23R - IL12RB2 and IL10 as Behçet's disease susceptibility loci

    Nobuhisa Mizuki;Akira Meguro;Masao Ota;Shigeaki Ohno

  • Long-term pattern of progression of myopic maculopathy: a natural history study.

    Kengo Hayashi;Kyoko Ohno-Matsui;Noriaki Shimada;Muka Moriyama

  • Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of multiple administration of infliximab in Behçet's disease with refractory uveoretinitis.

    Shigeaki Ohno;Satoshi Nakamura;Sadao Hori;Machiko Shimakawa

  • Kinetic analysis and mechanistic aspects of autoxidation of catechins.

    Manabu Mochizuki;Shin-ichi Yamazaki;Kenji Kano;Tokuji Ikeda

  • Human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-1) proviral load and disease progression in asymptomatic HTLV-1 carriers: a nationwide prospective study in Japan.

    Masako Iwanaga;Masako Iwanaga;Toshiki Watanabe;Atae Utsunomiya;Akihiko Okayama

  • Chapter 3 Retinal specific antigens and immunopathogenic processes they provoke

    I. Gery;M. Mochizuki;R.B. Nussenblatt

  • HTLV-I uveitis: a distinct clinical entity caused by HTLV-I.

    Manabu Mochizuki;Toshiki Watanabe;Kazunari Yamaguchi;Kiyoshi Takatsuki

  • Myopic choroidal neovascularization: A 10-year follow-up

    Takeshi Yoshida;Kyoko Ohno-Matsui;Kenjiro Yasuzumi;Ariko Kojima

  • Novel mechanism for age-related macular degeneration: an equilibrium shift between the angiogenesis factors VEGF and PEDF.

    Kyoko Ohno-Matsui;Ikuo Morita;Joyce Tombran-Tink;Joyce Tombran-Tink;David Mrazek;David Mrazek

  • Prevalence and characteristics of foveal retinal detachment without macular hole in high myopia.

    Takayuki Baba;Kyoko Ohno-Matsui;Soh Futagami;Takeshi Yoshida

  • Patchy atrophy and lacquer cracks predispose to the development of choroidal neovascularisation in pathological myopia

    K Ohno-Matsui;T Yoshida;S Futagami;K Yasuzumi

  • Soft contact lens biosensor for in situ monitoring of tear glucose as non-invasive blood sugar assessment.

    Ming Xing Chu;Kumiko Miyajima;Daishi Takahashi;Takahiro Arakawa

  • Preparation and characterization of decellularized cornea using high-hydrostatic pressurization for corneal tissue engineering

    Yoshihide Hashimoto;Seiichi Funamoto;Seiichi Funamoto;Shuji Sasaki;Shuji Sasaki;Takako Honda

  • The potential role of amyloid βin the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration

    Takeshi Yoshida;Kyoko Ohno-Matsui;Shizuko Ichinose;Tetsuji Sato

  • Epidemiological survey of intraocular inflammation in Japan

    Hiroshi Goto;Manabu Mochizuki;Kunihiko Yamaki;Satoshi Kotake

  • Use of multiplex PCR and real-time PCR to detect human herpes virus genome in ocular fluids of patients with uveitis

    Sunao Sugita;Norio Shimizu;Ken Watanabe;Miki Mizukami

  • Revised criteria of International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis.

    Manabu Mochizuki;Justine R Smith;Hiroshi Takase;Toshikatsu Kaburaki

  • Effectiveness of cyclosporin therapy for Behçet's disease.

    Robert B. Nussenblatt;Alan G. Palestine;Chi-Chao Chan;Manabu Mochizuki

  • Clinical characteristics of posterior staphyloma in eyes with pathologic myopia.

    Huang Wei Hsiang;Kyoko Ohno-Matsui;Noriaki Shimada;Kengo Hayashi

  • Uveitis associated with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I.

    Manabu Mochizuki;Toshiki Watanabe;Kazunari Yamaguchi;Koichi Yoshimura

  • The 2009 prospective multi-center epidemiologic survey of uveitis in Japan.

    Nobuyuki Ohguro;Koh Hei Sonoda;Masaru Takeuchi;Miyo Matsumura

  • Multicenter study of infliximab for refractory uveoretinitis in Behçet disease.

    Annabelle A. Okada;Hiroshi Goto;Shigeaki Ohno;Manabu Mochizuki

  • Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in dogs with paraplegia caused by thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion: 77 cases (2000-2003).

    Daisuke Ito;Satoru Matsunaga;Nick D. Jeffery;Nobuo Sasaki

Frequent Co-Authors

Sunao Sugita
Sunao Sugita Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Kyoko Ohno-Matsui
Kyoko Ohno-Matsui Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Ikuo Morita
Ikuo Morita Ochanomizu University
Kazunari Yamaguchi
Kazunari Yamaguchi National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo
Toshiki Watanabe
Toshiki Watanabe University of Tokyo
Kenji Ishii
Kenji Ishii Nippon Medical School
Chi-Chao Chan
Chi-Chao Chan National Institutes of Health
Ung-il Chung
Ung-il Chung University of Tokyo
Kiyoshi Takatsuki
Kiyoshi Takatsuki Kumamoto University
Shigeaki Ohno
Shigeaki Ohno Hokkaido University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can open doors to rewarding careers beyond a traditional medical degree. For those interested in patient care, finding whats the easiest nursing program to get into? can streamline your journey into nursing, offering less competitive admissions and accessible entry requirements.

Some students prefer nursing programs that avoid rigorous entrance tests. There are options for nursing schools that don't require teas, making the application process even more approachable.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration online degree can lead to leadership opportunities without direct patient care. Alternatively, roles in medical billing and coding provide essential support in healthcare settings, and students can often access financial aid for medical billing and coding programs to help manage costs.

Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways can help you find the right fit in the evolving world of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Manabu Mochizuki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles