World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
24253
World Ranking
15172
National Ranking
7657

Janice N. Cormier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice N. Cormier sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 298 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Janice N. Cormier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice N. Cormier sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janice N. Cormier is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research spans across multiple fields within medicine and molecular biology, with a focus on oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, and genetics.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, including:

  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Virus-based gene therapy research

Janice N. Cormier has contributed to at least two recent papers. One paper, published in 2020, is titled Cumulative Incidence and Predictors of CNS Metastasis for Patients With American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Stage III Melanoma and appeared in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. This paper has received 48 citations. Another recent publication from 2024, entitled Clinical Utility of Pre-Treatment and Surveillance Circulating Tumor Tissue Modified Viral HPV DNA to Detect Recurrence in a Community Based HN Cancer Program, was published in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

The list of frequent coauthors includes:

  • Lauren E. Haydu
  • Serigne Lo
  • Jennifer L. McQuade
  • Rodabe N. Amaria
  • Jennifer A. Wargo

Their publications have appeared in journals such as:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

In terms of research disciplines, Janice N. Cormier's work primarily resides within medicine, with additional significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Best Publications

  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline.

    Sandra L. Wong;Charles M. Balch;Patricia Hurley;Sanjiv S. Agarwala

  • Soft Tissue Sarcomas

    Janice Nicole Cormier;Raphael E. Pollock

  • Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma

    Rodabe N. Amaria;Sangeetha M. Reddy;Hussein A. Tawbi;Michael A. Davies

  • Incidence, Treatment Costs, and Complications of Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Among Women of Working Age: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study

    Ya-Chen Tina Shih;Ying Xu;Janice Nicole Cormier;Sharon Hermes Giordano

  • Lymphedema beyond breast cancer

    Janice Nicole Cormier;Robert L. Askew;Kristi S. Mungovan;Yan Xing

  • Specific lymphocyte subsets predict response to adoptive cell therapy using expanded autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients

    Laszlo G. Radvanyi;Chantale Bernatchez;Minying Zhang;Patricia S. Fox

  • Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

    Y. Xing;M. Foy;D. D. Cox;H. M. Kuerer

  • Ethnic Differences Among Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma

    Janice N. Cormier;Yan Xing;Meichun Ding;Jeffrey E. Lee

  • Clinicopathology and Outcomes for Mucinous and Signet Ring Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: Analysis from the National Cancer Data Base

    John R. Hyngstrom;Chung Yuan Hu;Yan Xing;Y. Nancy You

  • Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: a systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011

    Mei R. Fu;Sheila H. Ridner;Sophia H. Hu;Bob R. Stewart

  • Surgical Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Treatment with Imatinib

    Robert H. I. Andtbacka;Chaan S. Ng;Courtney L. Scaife;Janice N. Cormier

  • Contemporary Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for the Staging and Surveillance of Melanoma Patients: a Meta-analysis

    Yan Xing;Yulia Bronstein;Merrick I. Ross;Robert L. Askew

  • A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Complete Decongestive Therapy in the Treatment of Lymphedema From 2004 to 2011

    Bonnie B. Lasinski;Kathryn Mc Killip Thrift;De Courcy Squire;Melanie K. Austin

  • Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation

    M M Bilimoria;J N Cormier;Y Mun;J E Lee

  • Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

    Rodabe N Amaria;Peter A Prieto;Michael T Tetzlaff;Alexandre Reuben

  • Phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma

    K B Kim;O Eton;D W Davis;M L Frazier

  • Young-onset colorectal cancer: is it time to pay attention?

    Y. Nancy You;Yan Xing;Barry W. Feig;George J. Chang

  • Microscopic Tumor Burden in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Predicts Synchronous Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Patients With Melanoma

    Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;Robert H.I. Andtbacka;Victor G. Prieto;Marcella M. Johnson

  • Recent progress in the treatment and prevention of cancer-related lymphedema

    Simona F. Shaitelman;Kate D. Cromwell;John C. Rasmussen;Nicole L. Stout

  • Predictors and natural history of in-transit melanoma after sentinel lymphadenectomy.

    Timothy M. Pawlik;Merrick I Ross;Marcella M. Johnson;Christopher W. Schacherer

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry W. Feig
Barry W. Feig The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Merrick I. Ross
Merrick I. Ross The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jeffrey E. Lee
Jeffrey E. Lee The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Kelly K. Hunt
Kelly K. Hunt The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Paul F. Mansfield
Paul F. Mansfield The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Raphael E. Pollock
Raphael E. Pollock The Ohio State University
George J. Chang
George J. Chang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Peter W.T. Pisters
Peter W.T. Pisters The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Anthony Lucci
Anthony Lucci The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens pathways beyond the traditional MD and DO degrees. Many related online programs offer flexibility and specialized training for those interested in healthcare careers. For example, students passionate about diet and health may consider pursuing nutrition degrees online, which can lead to rewarding roles in wellness, public health, or clinical nutrition.

Working adults seeking leadership positions can benefit from enrolling in whats the best online mha program for working adults, designed to deliver advanced knowledge in healthcare administration while accommodating busy schedules.

For nurses who want to advance their qualifications, there are flexible online rn to bsn programs without clinicals, allowing registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree without needing to complete additional clinical hours.

Finally, those aiming for the highest level of nursing practice can look into the shortest msn to dnp program, which helps qualified nurses achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice efficiently. These various online degree options can complement a medical foundation and open diverse career possibilities in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Janice N. Cormier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles