World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
116
Citations
47189
World Ranking
4371
National Ranking
2387

Peter W.T. Pisters publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W.T. Pisters sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 357 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter W.T. Pisters D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W.T. Pisters sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter W.T. Pisters is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several interconnected subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Emergency Medical Services, and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology.

Their work covers a range of topics such as:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

Recent scholarly contributions by Pisters include the following papers:

  • Improving Goal Concordant Care Among 10 Leading Academic U.S. Cancer Hospitals: A Collaboration of the Alliance of Dedicated Cancer Centers, 2021, The Oncologist
  • Impact of an Interdisciplinary Goals-of-Care Program Among Medical Inpatients at a Comprehensive Cancer Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Propensity Score Analysis, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Impact of Cancer Care Regionalization on Patient Volume, 2022, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • A flexible-hazards cure model with application to patients with soft tissue sarcoma, 2022, Statistics in Medicine
  • Impact of an interdisciplinary goals of care program on hospital outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center during the COVID-19 pandemic: A propensity score analysis., 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Publication venues where Peter W.T. Pisters has frequently contributed include:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • The Oncologist
  • Statistics in Medicine

Collaborations have often involved the following co-authors:

  • Akhila Reddy
  • Nico Nortjé
  • Marina George
  • Kaycee Wilson
  • Diana L. Urbauer

Best Publications

  • Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Ronald P. DeMatteo;Karla V. Ballman;Cristina R. Antonescu;Robert G. Maki

  • Analysis of prognostic factors in 1,041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

    P. W. T. Pisters;Denis H. Y. Leung;J. M. Woodruff;W. Shi

  • NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    George D. Demetri;Margaret Von Mehren;Cristina R. Antonescu;Ronald P. DeMatteo

  • Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.

    P. W. T. Pisters;L. B. Harrison;Denis H. Y. Leung;J. M. Woodruff

  • Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial

    James Fleshman;Megan Branda;Daniel J. Sargent;Anne Marie Boller

  • NCCN Task Force report: management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)--update of the NCCN clinical practice guidelines.

    George D. Demetri;Robert S. Benjamin;Charles D. Blanke;Jean Yves Blay

  • Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Definitions, Management, and Role of Preoperative Therapy

    Gauri R. Varadhachary;Eric P. Tamm;James L. Abbruzzese;Henry Q. Xiong

  • Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease.

    Matthew H.G. Katz;Peter W.T. Pisters;Douglas B. Evans;Charlotte C. Sun

  • Preoperative Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Patients With Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head

    Douglas B. Evans;Gauri R. Varadhachary;Christopher H. Crane;Charlotte C. Sun

  • Prognostic factors for patients with localized soft-tissue sarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy: an analysis of 1225 patients.

    Gunar K. Zagars;Matthew T. Ballo;Peter W. T. Pisters;Raphael E. Pollock M.D.

  • Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

    Chandrajit P. Raut;Jennifer F. Tseng;Jennifer F. Tseng;Charlotte C. Sun;Huamin Wang

  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration

    Jennifer F. Tseng;Chandrajit P. Raut;Jeffrey E. Lee;Peter W.T. Pisters

  • Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system.

    Edmund C. Burke;William R. Jarnagin;Steven N. Hochwald;Peter W. T. Pisters

  • Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

    F. R. Spitz;J. L. Abbruzzese;Jeffrey E Lee;Peter W Pisters

  • Desmoid Tumor: Prognostic Factors and Outcome After Surgery, Radiation Therapy, or Combined Surgery and Radiation Therapy

    Matthew T. Ballo;Gunar K. Zagars;Alan Pollack;Peter W.T. Pisters

  • Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast.

    Arthur W. Chaney;Alan Pollack M.D.;Marsha D. Mcneese;Gunar K. Zagars

  • Long-Term Survival After Multidisciplinary Management of Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

    Matthew Harold Katz;Matthew Harold Katz;Huamin Wang;Jason B Fleming;Charlotte C Sun

  • A prospective, randomized trial of early enteral feeding after resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy

    Martin J. Heslin;Lianne Latkany;Denis Leung;Ari D. Brooks

  • Response of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer to neoadjuvant therapy is not reflected by radiographic indicators

    Matthew Harold Katz;Jason B Fleming;Priya R Bhosale;Gauri R Varadhachary

  • Phase II Trial of Preoperative Chemoradiation in Patients With Localized Gastric Adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): Quality of Combined Modality Therapy and Pathologic Response

    Jaffer A. Ajani;Kathryn Winter;Gordon S. Okawara;John H. Donohue

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas B. Evans
Douglas B. Evans Medical College of Wisconsin
Jeffrey E. Lee
Jeffrey E. Lee The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Robert A. Wolff
Robert A. Wolff The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Barry W. Feig
Barry W. Feig The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
James L. Abbruzzese
James L. Abbruzzese Duke University
Raphael E. Pollock
Raphael E. Pollock The Ohio State University
Christopher H. Crane
Christopher H. Crane Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jason B. Fleming
Jason B. Fleming The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jean Nicolas Vauthey
Jean Nicolas Vauthey The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Janice N. Cormier
Janice N. Cormier The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Medicine but unsure about committing to medical school, online healthcare degrees offer flexible and affordable alternatives. Many in-demand roles—such as medical billing and coding specialists, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, or nursing researchers—can start with accredited online programs.

For those seeking administrative roles, a low cost medical coding and billing online program can provide entry into healthcare without direct patient care. Nursing remains a popular path; for licensed RNs, the cheapest rn to bsn online programs help advance both skills and career prospects while maintaining work schedules.

Aspiring advanced practice nurses can consider the cheapest online fnp program options to become family nurse practitioners, a critical and growing healthcare role. For those interested in academia, research, or leadership, accredited phd nursing programs are also available online at an affordable cost.

Exploring these pathways can open doors to rewarding medical careers—many available fully online, and at a cost far less than a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Peter W.T. Pisters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles