World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James C. R. Stangoulis

James C. R. Stangoulis

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
46
Citations
7561
World Ranking
2718
National Ranking
206

James C. R. Stangoulis publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. R. Stangoulis sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 103 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

James C. R. Stangoulis D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. R. Stangoulis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Biochemistry

James C. R. Stangoulis mainly investigates Agronomy, Biofortification, Plant breeding, Oryza sativa and Horticulture. James C. R. Stangoulis combines subjects such as Fructification, Pollen and Fruit tree with his study of Agronomy. James C. R. Stangoulis works mostly in the field of Biofortification, limiting it down to topics relating to Biotechnology and, in certain cases, Vitamin, Bioavailability and Food fortification.

His Plant breeding study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Fructan and Raffinose. His work in the fields of Oryza overlaps with other areas such as Pearl, Fluorescence spectrometry and X-ray fluorescence. The concepts of his Horticulture study are interwoven with issues in Plant nutrition and Plant physiology.

His most cited work include:

  • A critical analysis of the causes of boron toxicity in plants (259 citations)
  • Constitutive Overexpression of the OsNAS Gene Family Reveals Single-Gene Strategies for Effective Iron- and Zinc-Biofortification of Rice Endosperm (241 citations)
  • Quantitative trait loci for phytate in rice grain and their relationship with grain micronutrient content (164 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

James C. R. Stangoulis focuses on Agronomy, Biofortification, Horticulture, Botany and Plant breeding. James C. R. Stangoulis has researched Agronomy in several fields, including Quantitative trait locus and Animal science. His Biofortification research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Biotechnology and Staple food.

His work on Brassica, Shoot, Dry weight and Aphid as part of general Horticulture research is frequently linked to Boron, bridging the gap between disciplines. James C. R. Stangoulis focuses mostly in the field of Botany, narrowing it down to topics relating to Toxicity and, in certain cases, Biophysics. His Plant breeding research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Oryza and Oryza sativa.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (42.55%)
  • Biofortification (24.47%)
  • Horticulture (24.47%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Agronomy (42.55%)
  • Biofortification (24.47%)
  • Biochemistry (10.64%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Agronomy, Biofortification, Biochemistry, Horticulture and Food science are his primary areas of study. His research integrates issues of Quantitative trait locus and Calcareous in his study of Agronomy. The study incorporates disciplines such as EDDHA, Chlorophyll, Crop, Sorghum and Plant breeding in addition to Biofortification.

He interconnects Biomarker, Residue and Shrimp in the investigation of issues within Biochemistry. His Horticulture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Fructose, Raffinose, Maltose, Sucrose and Metabolite. His study in Food science is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Ruminococcus and Lactic acid.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Biofortified indica rice attains iron and zinc nutrition dietary targets in the field. (134 citations)
  • Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci for zinc, iron and protein content in the grains of hexaploid wheat (37 citations)
  • Genetic dissection of grain zinc concentration in spring wheat for mainstreaming biofortification in CIMMYT wheat breeding (32 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Biochemistry

His primary areas of investigation include Quantitative trait locus, Agronomy, Zinc deficiency, Biofortification and Biochemistry. His work carried out in the field of Quantitative trait locus brings together such families of science as Breed, Chromosome and Molecular mapping. His Agronomy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Epistasis and Inclusive composite interval mapping.

His Zinc deficiency research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Endocrinology, Linoleic acid, Fatty acid and Biomarker, Internal medicine. His Biofortification research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Micronutrient deficiency, Germplasm and Candidate gene. His studies deal with areas such as Prawn, Residue, Shrimp and Detection limit as well as Biochemistry.

Best Publications

  • A critical analysis of the causes of boron toxicity in plants

    R. J. Reid;J. E. Hayes;A. Post;J. C. R. Stangoulis

  • Constitutive Overexpression of the OsNAS Gene Family Reveals Single-Gene Strategies for Effective Iron- and Zinc-Biofortification of Rice Endosperm

    Alexander A. T. Johnson;Alexander A. T. Johnson;Bianca Kyriacou;Bianca Kyriacou;Damien L. Callahan;Lorraine Carruthers

  • Nutrient composition of important fish species in Bangladesh and potential contribution to recommended nutrient intakes

    Jessica R. Bogard;Jessica R. Bogard;Shakuntala H. Thilsted;Geoffrey C. Marks;Md. Abdul Wahab

  • Biofortified indica rice attains iron and zinc nutrition dietary targets in the field.

    Kurniawan R Trijatmiko;Conrado Duenas;Nikolaos Tsakirpaloglou;Lina Torrizo

  • Quantitative trait loci for phytate in rice grain and their relationship with grain micronutrient content

    James C. R. Stangoulis;Bao-Lam Huynh;Ross M. Welch;Eun-Young Choi

  • Selenium concentration in wheat grain: Is there sufficient genotypic variation to use in breeding?

    Graham Lyons;Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio;James Stangoulis;Robin Graham

  • High-selenium wheat: biofortification for better health.

    Graham Lyons;James Stangoulis;Robin Graham

  • Selenium increases seed production in Brassica

    G. H. Lyons;Y. Genc;Y. Genc;K. Soole;J. C. R. Stangoulis

  • Foliar Boron Application Improves Flower Fertility and Fruit Set of Olive

    Slavko Perica;Patrick H. Brown;Joseph H. Connell;Agnes M.S. Nyomora

  • Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of zinc and iron concentration in rice and pearl millet grain

    Nicholas G. Paltridge;Lachlan J. Palmer;Paul J. Milham;Georgia E. Guild

  • Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a tool for zinc, iron and selenium analysis in whole grain wheat

    Nicholas G. Paltridge;Paul J. Milham;J. Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio;Govindan Velu

  • Kinetic analysis of boron transport in Chara.

    James C. R. Stangoulis;Robert J. Reid;Patrick H. Brown;Robin D. Graham

  • Selenium in Australia: selenium status and biofortification of wheat for better health.

    Graham H. Lyons;Geoffrey J. Judson;Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio;Yusuf Genc

  • Iron and zinc concentration of native Andean potato cultivars from a human nutrition perspective

    Gabriela Burgos;Walter Amoros;Maximo Morote;James Stangoulis

  • Genetic dissection of grain zinc concentration in spring wheat for mainstreaming biofortification in CIMMYT wheat breeding

    Govindan Velu;Ravi Prakash Singh;Leonardo Crespo-Herrera;Philomin Juliana

  • Genotypic variation in wheat grain fructan content revealed by a simplified HPLC method

    Bao-Lam Huynh;Bao-Lam Huynh;Lachlan Palmer;Diane E. Mather;Diane E. Mather;Hugh Wallwork;Hugh Wallwork

  • Exploiting micronutrient interaction to optimize biofortification programs: the case for inclusion of selenium and iodine in the HarvestPlus program.

    Graham H. Lyons;James C.R. Stangoulis;Robin D. Graham

  • Tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to high soil and solution selenium levels

    Graham H Lyons;James Constantine Roy Stangoulis;Robin David Graham

  • Biofortification of major crop plants with iron and zinc - achievements and future directions

    Unknown

  • Selenium distribution in wheat grain, and the effect of postharvest processing on wheat selenium content.

    Graham H Lyons;Yusuf Genc;James C R Stangoulis;Lyndon T Palmer

  • High-selenium wheat : agronomic biofortification strategies to improve human nutrition

    G. Lyons;J. Lewis;M. Lorimer;R. Holloway

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin D. Graham
Robin D. Graham University of Adelaide
Ute Roessner
Ute Roessner University of Melbourne
Robert J. Reid
Robert J. Reid University of Adelaide
Diane E. Mather
Diane E. Mather University of Adelaide
Ross M. Welch
Ross M. Welch Cornell University
Enzo Lombi
Enzo Lombi University of South Australia
Arun Kumar Joshi
Arun Kumar Joshi International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Ravi P. Singh
Ravi P. Singh International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Raymond P. Glahn
Raymond P. Glahn Agricultural Research Service
Patrick O. Brown
Patrick O. Brown Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James C. R. Stangoulis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles