World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
49
Citations
8861
World Ranking
2272
National Ranking
181

Diane E. Mather publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane E. Mather sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 144 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Diane E. Mather D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane E. Mather sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

Her primary areas of study are Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Hordeum vulgare, Agronomy and Plant breeding. In general Quantitative trait locus, her work in Doubled haploidy is often linked to Trait and Endosperm cellularization linking many areas of study. Diane E. Mather has researched Hordeum vulgare in several fields, including Coleoptile, Endosperm, Gene family, Quantitative genetics and Locus.

Her study in Agronomy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Fructan, Genetic variation, Monosaccharide and Enzymatic hydrolysis. Her research in Plant breeding intersects with topics in Raffinose, Molecular marker, Animal breeding, Breeding program and Monogastric. Her work in Genotyping addresses subjects such as Single-nucleotide polymorphism, which are connected to disciplines such as Evolutionary biology and Haplotype.

Her most cited work include:

  • Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array (995 citations)
  • Random amplified polymorphic DNA and pedigree relationships in spring barley. (230 citations)
  • Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies (216 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary scientific interests are in Agronomy, Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Botany and Poaceae. Her Plant breeding, Crop and Field experiment study, which is part of a larger body of work in Agronomy, is frequently linked to Selection, bridging the gap between disciplines. Her Quantitative trait locus study incorporates themes from Grain quality and Genetic variation.

Her studies in Genetic variation integrate themes in fields like Chromosome regions and Fructan. Her work in Genetics is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Hordeum vulgare. Diane E. Mather interconnects Plant disease resistance, Gene and Horticulture in the investigation of issues within Botany.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (39.16%)
  • Quantitative trait locus (39.16%)
  • Genetics (36.36%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Quantitative trait locus (39.16%)
  • Genetics (36.36%)
  • Gene (14.69%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Gene, Botany and Locus. Her work carried out in the field of Quantitative trait locus brings together such families of science as Grain quality, Agronomy, Horticulture and Gene mapping. Her research related to Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Haplotype, Allele, Genome and Genetic variation might be considered part of Genetics.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Western corn rootworm and Fungal colonization in addition to Botany. Her Locus research focuses on Heterodera avenae and how it connects with Cell biology, Vascular tissue and Hordeum vulgare. Diane E. Mather works mostly in the field of Genotyping, limiting it down to topics relating to Evolutionary biology and, in certain cases, Genetic marker.

Between 2012 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array (995 citations)
  • Whole genome mapping of agronomic and metabolic traits to identify novel quantitative trait loci in bread wheat grown in a water-limited environment (71 citations)
  • Multi-environment analysis and improved mapping of a yield-related QTL on chromosome 3B of wheat (60 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

Diane E. Mather spends much of her time researching Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Doubled haploidy, Agronomy and Botany. Her Quantitative trait locus research incorporates themes from Shoot and Locus. Her work in Genetic variation, Gene mapping, Genotype and Haplotype is related to Genetics.

Her Genotype research integrates issues from Evolutionary biology and Genetic diversity. She studied Agronomy and Gene–environment interaction that intersect with Test weight, Crop, Grain quality and Positional cloning. Her research investigates the connection between Botany and topics such as Gene that intersect with problems in Cell wall, Heterodera avenae and Glucan.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array

    Shichen Wang;Debbie Wong;Kerrie Forrest;Alexandra Allen

  • Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies

    Matthew Reynolds;David Bonnett;Scott C. Chapman;Robert T. Furbank

  • Random amplified polymorphic DNA and pedigree relationships in spring barley.

    N. A. Tinker;M. G. Fortin;D. E. Mather

  • Regions of the genome that affect agronomic performance in two-row barley

    N. A. Tinker;D. E. Mather;B. G. Rossnagel;K. J. Kasha

  • The Genetics and Transcriptional Profiles of the Cellulose Synthase-Like HvCslF Gene Family in Barley

    Rachel A. Burton;Stephen A. Jobling;Andrew J. Harvey;Neil J. Shirley

  • Effect of population size on the estimation of QTL: a test using resistance to barley stripe rust.

    M. I. Vales;C. C. Schön;F. Capettini;X. M. Chen

  • Regions of the Genome That Affect Grain and Malt Quality in a North American Two-Row Barley Cross

    D. E. Mather;N. A. Tinker;D. E. LaBerge;M. Edney

  • MQTL: software for simplified composite interval mapping of QTL in multiple environments.

    N. A. Tinker;D. E. Mather

  • Metabolic profiling and factor analysis to discriminate quantitative resistance in wheat cultivars against fusarium head blight

    H. Hamzehzarghani;A.C. Kushalappa;Y. Dion;S. Rioux

  • Chapter 10 - Genetic diversity for quantitatively inherited agronomic and malting quality traits

    Patrick M. Hayes;Ariel Castro;Luis Marquez-Cedillo;Ann Corey

  • Whole genome mapping of agronomic and metabolic traits to identify novel quantitative trait loci in bread wheat grown in a water-limited environment

    Camilla Beate Hill;Julian D Taylor;James Edwards;Diane Mather

  • Genotypic variation in wheat grain fructan content revealed by a simplified HPLC method

    Bao-Lam Huynh;Bao-Lam Huynh;Lachlan Palmer;Diane E. Mather;Diane E. Mather;Hugh Wallwork;Hugh Wallwork

  • Multi-environment analysis and improved mapping of a yield-related QTL on chromosome 3B of wheat

    Julien Bonneau;Julien Bonneau;Julian Taylor;Boris Parent;Dion Bennett

  • Methods for QTL analysis with progeny replicated in multiple environments

    N.A. Tinker;D.E. Mather

  • Plant population density effects on maize inbred lines grown in short-season environments

    A. M. Modarres;R. I. Hamilton;M. Dijak;L. M. Dwyer

  • Mapping of disease resistance loci in barley on the basis of visual assessment of naturally occurring symptoms

    D. Spaner;L. P. Shugar;T. M. Choo;I. Falak

  • Effect of silk age on resistance of maize to Fusarium graminearum

    L.M. Reid;A.T. Bolton;R.I. Hamilton;T. Woldemariam

  • Genetic improvement of spring barley cultivars grown in eastern Canada from 1910 to 1988

    Patrick Bulman;Diane E. Mather;Donald L. Smith

  • QTLs affecting kernel size and shape in a two-rowed by six-rowed barley cross

    M. Ayoub;S. J. Symons;M. J. Edney;D. E. Mather

  • Quantitative trait loci for grain fructan concentration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

    Bao-Lam Huynh;Bao-Lam Huynh;Hugh Wallwork;Hugh Wallwork;James C. R. Stangoulis;Robin D. Graham

  • A QTL on the short arm of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) chromosome 3B affects the stability of grain weight in plants exposed to a brief heat shock early in grain filling

    Hamid Shirdelmoghanloo;Julian D. Taylor;Iman Lohraseb;Huwaida Rabie;Huwaida Rabie

  • Detection of QTL for metabolic and agronomic traits in wheat with adjustments for variation at genetic loci that affect plant phenology.

    Camilla B. Hill;Julian D. Taylor;James Edwards;Diane Mather;Diane Mather

  • Genetic control of grain yield and grain physical characteristics in a bread wheat population grown under a range of environmental conditions

    Lancelot Maphosa;Peter Langridge;Helen Taylor;Boris Parent;Boris Parent

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Chalmers
Kenneth J. Chalmers University of Adelaide
Matthew J. Hayden
Matthew J. Hayden La Trobe University
Dean Spaner
Dean Spaner University of Alberta
Patrick M. Hayes
Patrick M. Hayes Oregon State University
Peter Langridge
Peter Langridge University of Adelaide
Donald L. Smith
Donald L. Smith McGill University
Rachel A. Burton
Rachel A. Burton University of Adelaide
Brian J. Steffenson
Brian J. Steffenson University of Minnesota
Brian G. Rossnagel
Brian G. Rossnagel University of Saskatchewan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Diane E. Mather

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles