World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
42
Citations
6917
World Ranking
3462
National Ranking
151

Dean Spaner publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean Spaner sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 176 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Dean Spaner D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean Spaner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A large-effect QTL for grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress in upland rice.

    Jérôme Bernier;Arvind Kumar;Venuprasad Ramaiah;Dean Spaner

  • Breeding upland rice for drought resistance

    Jérôme Bernier;Jérôme Bernier;Gary N Atlin;Rachid Serraj;Arvind Kumar

  • Flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a key factor for global adaptability

    Atif Kamran;Atif Kamran;Muhammad Iqbal;Muhammad Iqbal;Dean Spaner

  • The association of culm anatomy with lodging susceptibility in modern spring wheat genotypes

    A.J. Kelbert;D. Spaner;K.G. Briggs;J.R. King

  • Competitive ability of wheat in conventional and organic management systems: A review of the literature

    H. E. Mason;D. Spaner

  • The large-effect drought-resistance QTL qtl12.1 increases water uptake in upland rice

    Jérôme Bernier;Jérôme Bernier;Rachid Serraj;Arvind Kumar;Ramaiah Venuprasad

  • Application of molecular markers to wheat breeding in Canada

    Harpinder S. Randhawa;Muhammad Asif;Curtis Pozniak;John M. Clarke

  • Forage potential of intercropping berseem clover with barley, oat, or triticale

    Shirley M. Ross;Jane R. King;John T. O’Donovan;Dean Spaner

  • Characterization of the effect of a QTL for drought resistance in rice, qtl12.1 , over a range of environments in the Philippines and eastern India

    Jérôme Bernier;Jérôme Bernier;Arvind Kumar;Ramaiah Venuprasad;Dean Spaner

  • Biology and Integrated Management of Wheat Stem Sawfly and the Need for Continuing Research

    B.L. Beres;L.M. Dosdall;D.K. Weaver;H.A. Cárcamo

  • The Weed-Competitive Ability of Canada Western Red Spring Wheat Cultivars Grown under Organic Management

    Heather E. Mason;Alireza Navabi;Brenda L. Frick;John T. O'Donovan

  • Genetic analysis of flowering and maturity time in high latitude spring wheat: Genetic analysis of earliness in spring wheat

    Muhammad Iqbal;Alireza Navabi;Donald F. Salmon;Rong-Cai Yang

  • Mapping of disease resistance loci in barley on the basis of visual assessment of naturally occurring symptoms

    D. Spaner;L. P. Shugar;T. M. Choo;I. Falak

  • Simultaneous selection for early maturity, increased grain yield and elevated grain protein content in spring wheat

    M. Iqbal;A. Navabi;D. F. Salmon;R.-C. Yang

  • Cultivar and Seeding Rate Effects on the Competitive Ability of Spring Cereals Grown under Organic Production in Northern Canada

    H. Mason;A. Navabi;B. Frick;J. O'Donovan

  • Molecular characterization of vernalization response genes in Canadian spring wheat.

    Muhammad IqbalM. Iqbal;Alireza NavabiA. Navabi;Rong-Cai YangR.-C. Yang;Donald F. SalmonD.F. Salmon

  • Can spring wheat-growing megaenvironments in the northern great plains be dissected for representative locations or niche-adapted genotypes?

    Alireza Navabi;Rong-Cai Yang;James Helm;Dean M. Spaner

  • Agrobiodiversity: Its Value, Measurement, and Conservation in the Context of Sustainable Agriculture

    Brian Love;Dean Spaner

  • Should spring wheat breeding for organically managed systems be conducted on organically managed land

    Todd A. Reid;Rong-Cai Yang;Donald F. Salmon;D. Spaner

  • Application of infrared thermal imaging for the rapid diagnosis of crop disease

    Wenjing Zhu;Hua Chen;Izabela Ciechanowska;Dean Spaner

  • Marker-based selection of QTL affecting grain and malt quality in two-row barley.

    E. Igartua;M. Edney;B. G. Rossnagel;D. Spaner

  • Competitive traits and the stability of wheat cultivars in differing natural weed environments on the northern Canadian prairies

    Heather E. Mason;Laksiri A. Goonewardene;Dean Spaner

  • Intercropping Berseem Clover with Barley and Oat Cultivars for Forage

    Shirley M. Ross;Jane R. King;John T. O'Donovan;Dean Spaner

  • QTL detection with bidirectional and unidirectional selective genotyping: marker-based and trait-based analyses

    Alizera Navabi;Alizera Navabi;D. E. Mather;J. Bernier;J. Bernier;D. M. Spaner

Frequent Co-Authors

Kassa Semagn
Kassa Semagn University of Alberta
Diane E. Mather
Diane E. Mather University of Adelaide
Pierre Hucl
Pierre Hucl University of Saskatchewan
John T. O'Donovan
John T. O'Donovan Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
Sylvie A. Quideau
Sylvie A. Quideau University of Alberta
Gary N. Atlin
Gary N. Atlin Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
François Eudes
François Eudes Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
Stephen E. Strelkov
Stephen E. Strelkov University of Alberta
Lloyd M. Dosdall
Lloyd M. Dosdall University of Alberta
R. M. DePauw
R. M. DePauw Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dean Spaner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles