World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
4477
World Ranking
9279
National Ranking
4911

Gary N. Siperstein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary N. Siperstein sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gary N. Siperstein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary N. Siperstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary N. Siperstein is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Boston in the United States and has contributed to multiple areas within social sciences and psychology. Their research focus spans fields such as Safety Research, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Speech and Hearing.

Their work prominently addresses topics including Family and Disability Support Research, Disability Education and Employment, Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression, Youth Development and Social Support, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, Education Discipline and Inequality, and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Gary N. Siperstein include:

  • "Positive identity development through community engagement among youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities," published in 2023 in the Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
  • "A Place for Everybody": Students' Perspectives on Inclusive Behavior in School, published in 2022 in Educational Researcher
  • "It's right, but risky too: Inclusive behavior as a positive risk in adolescence," published in 2021 in Journal of Adolescence
  • "GRANDCHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES: THE ROLE OF GRANDPARENTS' RELATIONSHIPS," published in 2024 in Innovation in Aging
  • "From the Coach's Perspective: Making Interscholastic Sports Inclusive for Students With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities," forthcoming in 2025 in Journal of Teaching in Physical Education

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Gary N. Siperstein include:

  • Jason Rodriquez
  • Staci C. Ballard
  • Anmol Gupta
  • Holly Jacobs
  • Timothy P. Shriver

Their publications appear in various venues including:

  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
  • Educational Researcher
  • Journal of Adolescence
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Journal of Teaching in Physical Education

Gary N. Siperstein's scholarly contributions address complex issues surrounding inclusion, identity, and support for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, particularly focusing on community engagement, inclusive education, and youth development.

Best Publications

  • A National Study of Youth Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Intellectual Disabilities

    Gary N. Siperstein;Robin C. Parker;Jennifer Norins Bardon;Keith F. Widaman

  • Maternal involvement in the education of young children with autism spectrum disorders

    Paul Benson;Kristie L Karlof;Gary N Siperstein

  • Stress, Social Support, and Adjustment of Adolescents in Middle School

    Melodie Wenz-Gross;Gary N. Siperstein;Andrew S. Untch;Keith F. Widaman

  • Social Status of Learning Disabled Children

    Gary N. Siperstein;Michael J. Bopp;John J. Bak

  • School Context and the Academic and Behavioral Progress of Students with Emotional Disturbance

    Gary N. Siperstein;Andrew L. Wiley;Steven R. Forness

  • A national survey of consumer attitudes towards companies that hire people with disabilities

    Gary N. Siperstein;Neil Romano;Amanda Mohler;Robin Parker

  • Conceptual and psychometric concerns about the 1992 AAMR definition of mental retardation.

    MacMillan Dl;Gresham Fm;Siperstein Gn

  • Social acceptance of children with mental retardation: Testing the contact hypothesis with an Italian sample

    Mara Manetti;Barry H. Schneider;Gary Siperstein

  • Importance of Social Support in the Adjustment of Children with Learning Problems

    Melodie Wenz-Gross;Gary N. Siperstein

  • National snapshot of adults with intellectual disabilities in the labor force

    Gary N. Siperstein;Robin C. Parker;Max Drascher

  • Social inclusion of children with intellectual disabilities in a recreational setting.

    Gary N. Siperstein;Gary C. Glick;Robin C. Parker

  • A Challenge to the Viability of Mild Mental Retardation as a Diagnostic Category

    Donald L. MacMillan;Gary N. Siperstein;Frank M. Gresham

  • Pathways to employment: A national survey of adults with intellectual disabilities

    Gary N. Siperstein;Miriam Heyman;Jeffrey E. Stokes

  • Students with learning problems at risk in middle school: stress, social support, and adjustment

    Melodie Wenz-Gross;Gary N. Siperstein

  • The Relative Equitability of High-Stakes Testing versus Teacher-Assigned Grades: An Analysis of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)

    Robert T. Brennan;Jimmy Kim;Melodie Wenz-Gross;Gary N. Siperstein

  • The Sport Experience of Athletes With Intellectual Disabilities: A National Survey of Special Olympics Athletes and Their Families

    Coreen M. Harada;Gary N. Siperstein

  • Promoting social inclusion for people with intellectual disabilities through sport: Special Olympics International, global sport initiatives and strategies

    Coreen M. Harada;Gary N. Siperstein;Robin C. Parker;David Lenox

  • Efficacy of Special Education and Related Services

    Kenneth A. Kavale;Steven R. Forness;Gary N. Siperstein

  • The labyrinth of IDEA: school decisions on referred students with subaverage general intelligence.

    Donald L. MacMillan;Frank M. Gresham;Gary N. Siperstein;Kathleen M. Bocian

  • The Quality of Friendships between Children with and without Learning Problems.

    Gary N. Siperstein;James S. Leffert;Melodie Wenz-Gross

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank M. Gresham
Frank M. Gresham Louisiana State University
Keith F. Widaman
Keith F. Widaman University of California, Riverside
Steven R. Forness
Steven R. Forness University of California, Los Angeles
John Sideris
John Sideris University of Southern California
Barry H. Schneider
Barry H. Schneider Boston College
Kenneth A. Kavale
Kenneth A. Kavale Regent University
Samuel L. Odom
Samuel L. Odom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert T. Brennan
Robert T. Brennan Boston College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in psychology also explore careers in social work and related fields. Social work is a dynamic and rewarding pathway that often overlaps with psychological principles. Pursuing an online degree in social work can open doors to a range of positions in counseling, community outreach, school guidance, and healthcare support.

The best social work programs in Memphis offer strong foundations in both theory and fieldwork for students who want to start or advance their careers. If you're considering Florida, take a look at the best social work degrees in Miami, which feature diverse specialty tracks suitable for varied interests.

Those interested in studying in the central United States may find valuable options in the best social work degrees in the Midwest, known for their flexible online curriculums and respected faculty. Additionally, Minnesota is recognized for its excellence in the field, with several top social work programs in Minnesota that emphasize hands-on learning and clinical practice.

Exploring these related online degrees can broaden your perspective and provide multiple routes for building a purposeful, people-centered career.

Best Scientists Citing Gary N. Siperstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles