World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
17562
World Ranking
7079
National Ranking
3823

Fred E. Fiedler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred E. Fiedler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Fred E. Fiedler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred E. Fiedler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fred E. Fiedler was affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States during their academic career. They contributed to the scientific community primarily through research and scholarship associated with this institution.

Throughout their career, Fred E. Fiedler did not have any recent published papers documented in the available data. There are no records of frequent co-authors or preferred publication venues indicated, nor any book publications tied to specific publishers. Additionally, there is no detailed data on main fields, subfields, or specific research topics associated with their work in this record.

There is no information available on any awards won by Fred E. Fiedler or the years in which such accolades might have been received.

Fred E. Fiedler is deceased, and this profile reflects their academic record in past tense accordingly.

Best Publications

  • A theory of leadership effectiveness

    Fred Edward Fiedler

  • A Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness1

    Fred.E. Fiedler

  • THE CULTURE ASSIMILATOR: AN APPROACH TO CROSS-CULTURAL TRAINING

    Fred E. Fiedler;Terence R. Mitchell;Harry C. Triandis

  • The Contingency Model and the Dynamics of the Leadership Process1

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • Research on Leadership Selection and Training: One View of the Future

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • Validation and extension of the contigency model of leadership effectiveness: a review of empirical findings.

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • New Approaches to Effective Leadership: Cognitive Resources and Organizational Performance

    Fred Edward Fiedler;Joseph E. Garcia

  • Leadership and effective management

    Fred Edward Fiedler;Martin M. Chemers

  • Improving Leadership Effectiveness: The Leader Match Concept

    Fred Edward Fiedler;Martin M. Chemers;Linda Mahar

  • A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness.

    Ralph N. Campbell;Fred E. Fiedler

  • The contingency model of leadership effectiveness: Its levels of analysis

    Roya Ayman;Martin M. Chemers;Fred Fiedler

  • The effect of leadership and cultural heterogeneity on group performance: A test of the contingency model

    Fred E Fiedler

  • Cognitive Resources and Leadership Performance

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • Assumed similarity measures as predictors of team effectiveness.

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • Unconscious attitudes as correlates of sociometric choice in a social group.

    Fred E. Fiedler;Willard G. Warrington;Francis J. Blaisdell

  • Engineer the job to fit the manager.

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • Leadership experience and leader performance—another hypothesis shot to hell☆

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • The Effects of Leadership Training and Experience: A Contingency Model Interpretation.

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • The Contribution of Cognitive Resources and Leader Behavior to Organizational Performance1

    Fred E. Fiedler

  • Leadership theory and research: A report of progress.

    Fred E. Fiedler;Robert J. House

  • A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness.

    Karl F. Simpson;Fred E. Fiedler

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry C. Triandis
Harry C. Triandis University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Terence R. Mitchell
Terence R. Mitchell University of Washington
Charles E. Osgood
Charles E. Osgood University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ronald E. Smith
Ronald E. Smith University of Washington
Daniel R. Ilgen
Daniel R. Ilgen Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the US opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students choose to specialize further, focusing on areas like counseling or clinical psychology. It’s important to understand that becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC) often requires state-specific education, supervised experience, and passing specialized exams.

If you’re considering an online program, keep in mind that requirements vary greatly by location. For example, learning how to become a licensed therapist in Port St. Lucie may differ significantly from meeting the Portland licensed therapist requirements. Those planning to work in North Carolina can find guidance on how to become a licensed therapist in Raleigh, while aspiring counselors in Nevada should review the Reno licensed therapist requirements.

No matter where you start, accredited online psychology degrees can provide flexibility and foundational knowledge. Just ensure your chosen program aligns with your career goals and state licensure needs for a smooth pathway to professional practice.

Best Scientists Citing Fred E. Fiedler